| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Comments:
<0> mario i am in web page apache but cant find for windows apache
<1> jgaddis, im trying to get round to a single IP setup with heartbeat , i did a simple config on both machines , brought up a 10.x.x.* network on their secondary NICs and a public ip on machine A . When i bring down the 10. iface in order for the heartbeats to be non responsive so i can check that it will steal the public ip , it seems that it doesnt. Is this natural behaviour? I mean , machine B doesnt even attempt to bring up eth1
<1> and on machine B , i can see the ipfail process running constantly
<1> what would be the best way to perform a fullproof test of heartbeat
<1> bring down the public iface on machine A ?
<0> i cant finnd it
<0> can you give the site for windows
<0> please mario
<1> manmalta , look for "binaries"
<1> win32 binaries that is
<0> mario please give the site please
<1> i couldnt have expressed myself any better :)
<1> hah
<2> anyway, time to go grab some food
<3> hello guys, can i ask a question please, does multipath route on recent kernel has a dead gateway detection featuer on it?
<4> could be. if so its documented.
<5> hi, does an smp kernel have its own source?
<4> urug: what do you mean ?
<6> urug: check your distro
<3> urug, yes it has, i think almost every distro has a kernel source
<7> urug: smp kern source is same as up kern source
<5> well my kernel is 2.6.12-12mdksmp but i can only find mdk sources, not mdksmp source files
<3> Lion-O: i don't see any documentation regaring if it has a dead gateway detection anyway i will try my luck again
<7> urug: http://kernel.org
<5> is there kernel sources for smp architectures specifically?
<5> i can't see any on kernel.rog
<4> urug: its a feature supported by the regular kernel.
<3> urug: if you want to build your kernel from kernel.org just enable smp support
<6> urug: ftp.kernel.org
<7> urug: there is only one kernel, not smp or uniprocessor
<7> urug: it's a configuration option
<3> urug: why don't you get your source from your distribution it would be much easier for you on this way
<7> urug: download the version you want. Read the documentation. Configure, compile, install
<7> anti-uce: he already said he couldn't find the kernel sources for his distro
<5> ive found it. i didn't think it was correct because it didn't have an smp suffix
<5> thanks
<4> that'll be $5 ;)
<6> :p
<3> :p ask and run
<1> anyone else ever messed with hearbeat or the ha-linux project?
<6> anti-uce: are you talking to me?
<4> hmm, finally got my full vmware server license.
<6> anti-uce: cause i can't see anyone else here, so you must be talking to me..
<3> i'm refering to urug :p
<8> I've done some heartbeat stuff...not a whole lot though
<7> anti-uce: we're better off without him
<1> i got heartbeat problems
<1> :)
<3> atompngn: :)
<3> mario__: what about heartbeat ?
<7> mario: maybe you should see a doctor
<1> i setup a basic version of heartbeat for a fail over
<6> nooo? you didnt...
<3> mario__: then ?
<1> when i try to block machine A which has a public ip and a secondary nic connected to fail over machine B , machine B does not up the iface on another nic that is to takeover the ublic ip of machine A , i read the documentation , and it seems that i must not up the ifaces upon boot , but hb doesnt up them itself
<1> even when i block the p2p connection they have via a 10.x.x.x network between them thats not visible to the public side , they dont act accordingly
<3> mario__: does it failover on the 2nd nic? eth:0 or something?
<3> mario__: or it failover on the 2nd wrong ip side?
<1> its basicaaly , 2 nics on each machine , 2 interfaces public , 2 private for comm between them , i want when eth0 (public) on A to fail , eth1 (public , but no ip untill it takesover) to activate
<1> no it doesnt , it simply doesnt fail over
<1> problem is , on machine B , i constantly see ipfail in the process list
<1> and i was thinking
<1> what the hell can i be doing thats so wrong on such a simple one ip setup
<7> I am convinced that xmms random function plays a dozen songs over and over again.
<1> i was thinking , changing bcast to ucast since its only one box , run heartbeat with a -d for debug , and then monitor network activity
<4> atompngn: same here. Its one of the main reasons I moved to amaroK.
<3> mario__: could you pastebin your config for review?
<1> paste it here?
<3> pastebin.ca
<9> HOLY **** http://www.metacafe.com/watch/178205/every_mans_dream_girl/
<9> sfw
<1> hold , im at home , see if i got the firewall blocking that network or not so i can ssh up to it
<10> first time a bow+arrow made me hot..
<9> haha
<10> think ill go deer hunting like that
<3> FauxReal: the girl was so hot :p
<1> anti uce
<1> unfortunately i got the pix blocking it all
<1> i need auth to unblock the network from here without a vpn setup
<1> but i do have a question
<1> about hb thats definately going to help
<11> Lion-O: amarok eh?
<1> basic concept is : dont lift up ifaces , hb does it , when 10.x.x.x fails , activate public on other eth ?
<1> what if 10.x simply fails due to a bad cable , but the public is running , wont the machines fight for that ip ?
<3> mario__: it should failover on the public side
<3> FauxReal: the girl was pretty and dangerous
<10> yes, she was
<1> are you supposed to add a ping directive in the config of the public ip of machine A in machien B's conf ?
<1> or does ping dislike directives concerning cluster nodes?
<3> w8
<1> im very close to doing something very DIY in bash to be honest :)
<1> hahaha
<1> unfortunately i cant ,due to me being an admin , and not some CTO
<1> :)
<3> mario__: it's should be on broadcast don't change it to unicast, well if you could pastebin the config i can surely check what you have missing
<1> ill do it ASAP tomorrow morning , im GMT+2 its 20:03 right now
<1> perhaps i can paste it in a mailing list you are subscribed to ?
<3> mario__: me is Asia/Pacific +8 Malaysia/singapore time zone
<3> mario__: you could e-mail it to loloski@gmail.com
<1> will do asap
<3> ok
<1> i apreciate it
<1> cheers uce
<3> no problem buddy
<3> brb, call of nature
<1> have fun
<1> brb , bubble bath moments
<12> win next
<1> jostein : have a pasta salad with carrot and mayo
<13> no
<13> Im having a pizza
<13> plus salads **** when you are really hungry. doesnt feel like proper food :P
<1> pasta salad is different
<1> plus you can put beef in it
<1> and make it... beefy
<1> :D
<13> bah
<1> want my latest ccie books ?
<13> I have no idea what a ccie book is, but I have nontechnical piece of fiction I'd like to give some attention
<9> mario__: huh?
<11> haha
<11> somehow i dont think books are goinig to help that guy to his ccie goal
<14> I always use Linux/iptables to make a NAT router. Is there a way to use iptables without making it NAT?
<15> yeah
<14> how?
<15> transparent proxy, or proxy arp
<15> well
<14> I still need it to be a router and p*** traffic from one network to another.
<15> transparent proxy's a misnomer
<15> then just p*** the traffic
<15> you don't have to have NAT to apply firewall rules.
<15> you have INPUT OUTPUT and FORWARD tables. your rules would most likely be on the FORWARD table.
<15> and if you're doing nat correctly, your firewall rules go on the FORWARD table anyway.
<15> nat rules in -t nat, access control rules in FORWARD.
<14> If I don't masquerade and use ip forwarding I don't know how to p*** traffic.
<14> still here?
<3> Tramse: what do you try to accomplish
<14> siglite: I got it. So, Rather than the PREROUTING and POSTROUTING, right?
<15> yes
<11> siglite: oh go to hell
<11> i'm stuck here in this bull**** and youget to leave? bah
<9> D-side: im stuck here too
<9> and it's 8:30 pm
<9> so zip it :)
Return to
#linux
or
Go to some related
logs:
#apache
#chatzone
replace with .htaccess
#apache
#linuxhelp
#linux
#chatzone
MIRC Abitibi
#linux
disater recovery linux
|
|