| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Comments:
<0> :)
<0> I am trying to practice with that method
<0> You are right, I should be doing it with yast... but... i'm going to work on all unix systems
<1> "I'm learning to **** up systems, because it's cool to **** up systems, people love downtime."
<2> On each unix system, you use their package management to get the stuff you want/need.
<1> hatOFF: in that case, you'd better learn to read documentation.
<1> hatOFF: go read.
<1> hatOFF: bye now.
<0> :)
<0> i feel capturated
<0> they are telling me to do the same commands i did without reading that
<0> and same errors
<0> whatsoever
<0> i'll just feel with yast
<0> :)
<3> good night
<4> that girl is a weirdo.
<2> D-side: no **** sherlock.
<2> D-side: she likes coming in here and hanging out with us weirdos.
<2> D-side: and if you need any proof of the fact that this channel is full of weirdos, just look at the topic.
<5> jesus my head hurts
<5> I think I've got a tumor
<2> TenBaseT: is that as a result of the topic?
<5> hhahaha no, that caused the unrelated retinal detatchment
<6> UGH
<6> TenBaseT: ITS NOT A TUUUUUMOOOOOOOOOOOOOOR
<5> hah
<6> ...
<6> siglite: moop
<7> I am bored, give me noobs
<6> *blinks*
<8> how can I search all files on my server for the phrase "#nome do prcesso :P" ?
<7> is the phrase in the filename or in the file
<8> in the file
<7> damn
<7> I don't know, sorry
<8> lol
<7> maybe someone else knows
<8> thanks for thinking about it
<7> find / | xargs cat | grep "phrase to find" will display if found
<7> but it won't display in which fil eit is
<7> tried for some "man find" ?
<9> how about: egrep -rl / "phrase to find"
<9> :-p
<7> I'll remember that, thanks you mod?--
<7> (damn to this apple and this apple keyboard)
<9> jeremib: but if you've been rooted, you'll probably have to reinstall
<8> :-I
<6> bock: stop spoonfeeding.
<10> probably ?
<10> NO, you will have to
<9> heh
<11> what is a "trusted user" and how ca i do my user to be "trusted user"
<10> a trusted user is on who knows you will bash his head in with a pipe if he screws you
<6> i.e. people you think you know.
<7> kosmo, what does spoonfeeding mean?
<6> bock: this isnt a help channel.
<6> bock: and, you may wish to consider reading the chanfaq.
<7> okok :)
<11> there's another chanel.. linux help?
<6> holy hell
<12> active directory ****s
<6> tavi-san: you can say that again.
<12> kosmo: heh
<12> Ka-bar: :)
<7> Ok, I read the faq
<6> wow. Evelynne Wood in the flesh
<12> where?
<13> kosmo++
<6> ka*bow*
<14> tavi-san: in fairness, it is increasingly ****ing less as time goes on. the old style domain stuff was about where netware 3 bindery services was, close on a decade ago. Active Directory 2003 is about the same as netware 4.x's version of NDS. maybe in another few years they will catch up to where novell is :)
<6> Ka-bar: *bow* even.
<6> bock: dude, you read even faster than my wife.
<5> you know what though
<5> I *like* AD
<5> it partitions and replicates better than NDS
<7> kosmo, maybe I just didn't find them :)
<15> blah, dual head is a bitch to setup
<6> TenBaseT: you are also a sadist.
<5> I'm such a sadist my unix/linux boxes all authenticate to AD via the MS NIS server
<14> TenBaseT: debatable. the FSMO structure is unstable if you lose a FSMO host, and actual partition replication is poor in both bandwidth and speed to where eDirectory is today. its about the same as NDS was back in the novell 4.x days :)
<6> bock: how could you have NOT found the EXTENSIVE channel faq that PolarWolf PAINSTAKINGLY took the time to craft?
<5> well thats true, my last experience with Netware was 5.0. it's been a while.
<16> TenBaseT: I was looking into that, but I figured that authing against a real domain would be enough to require me to have CALs for each users authing
<14> TenBaseT: in that case, AD 2003 is about the same - minus the FSMO bottleneck NDS didn't have in 5.x.
<5> wlfshmn: per-user or per-seat. Either way, you'd have to read the fine print on SFR to see whats going on
<5> wlfshmn: s/SFR/SFU
<14> TenBaseT: you have ldap access in 5.x iirc - which was new from 4 - and native LPR support
<5> was it real LDAP?
<14> TenBaseT: yup
<5> I remember that NDPS was a ****ing joke in 5.0
<7> kosmo, its too much clicking. I'd prefer one big document.
<16> TenBaseT: I decided the headache wasn't worth it in that case, as it's only two users that need access to a linux-based system, so I maintain separate p***words for them
<6> bock: ****s to be you.
<5> I also remember PureIP being a pain in hte *** and everyone was still running IPX
<6> whiny bitch.
<7> kosmo, why?
<14> TenBaseT: yeah, that it was. "unix services" was an addon product for 4.x and was far superior to NDPS
<6> bock: Ignorance of the rules is no excuse.
<16> TenBaseT: Once I get some spare time (ha!) I'll move the stuff to a windows machine that should be licensed right already
<14> TenBaseT: at my last employer, we used NDPS *only* for the LPR support and cl***ic queues for everything else
<5> Was the LDAP in 5.x all those weird broker services?
<5> I didnt really know what was going on with those back then
<14> TenBaseT: no, that was NDPS
<6> I really need to get this **** finished before I rund out of battery power
<5> but I seem to remember other brokered services that werent NDPS
<14> TenBaseT: ldap was a single daemon but not preinstalled
<5> oh, nevermind then
<5> That was a long time ago that I was doing 5.x.
<7> kosmo, I'm not ignoring them. I just found myself in a <prev next> environment, which I'm now reading
<5> I've heard that edirectory rocks out hard these days
<14> the NDPS daemons were bloody stupid - you had to have a finder daemon, general support daemon, then per printer daemons all using up per-host logins
<6> TenBaseT: yes, EDir kicks serious ***.
<12> DaveHowe: hehe yeah :)
<14> TenBaseT: basically, Novell's directory stuff is about five to six years ahead of microsoft - every time microsoft issue a new service, it tends to be based on what novell were offering five years ago :)
<14> TenBaseT: if novell weren't so bloody overpriced for their stuff, they would rule
<5> DaveHowe: but edirectory is free.
<5> The one thing I STILL have not forgiven MS for is the lack of a salvage/purge function on NTFS
<7> I excuse, but the bright blue on the white on my apple display just didn't catch my eyes.
<12> how the **** is it possible that in an .us company, in which the policy states clear "NO GAMES WHATSOEVER" most users actually play windows/java games like mad
<12> and more of this, how can they do that during the days when the .us owner of the company is paying us a visit?
<5> tavi-san: the same way that it says NO PORN WHATSOEVER you'll actually find porn on a lot of computers
<4> tavi-san: bah. rat!
<14> TenBaseT: it is now. or at least they give you a free licence (5K seats iirc?) these days. no novell server, or zenworks, or any of the really fancy stuff
<12> TenBaseT: well, porn is different ;)
<5> you got a dude fired for playing a game? what the ****?
<5> I'd be waiting for you in the parking lot if you did that
<14> TenBaseT: all the dev libraries are free though - which is nice. there are even activex modules for edirectory integration from (for example) iis servers
<12> TenBaseT: well, after deleting the windows games, he was caught by the $boss playing some java games
<12> TenBaseT: i had to file the report and get him fired
<12> actually in the past two weeks ive been covering for them like mad after repeatedly i was asked for logs with visited sites
<12> and that list wasnt really SFW
<5> does the policy say NO IRC WHATSOEVER?
<12> but just now i went there and told them that i wont cover up again
<5> because if you objectively pulled those logs you probably should have been fired years ago ;)
<4> i wonder where this is going...
<6> see
<6> :)
Return to
#linux
or
Go to some related
logs:
wait, kaylie
#MissKitten
#mirc
#AllNiteCafe
vc++ 2005 char*
cheekita
redirecting a page in javascript using submit button onclick
sweetraluca
#linux
#chatzone
|
|