| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Comments:
<0> smsie: I've had plenty of problems with nvidias through out the years I've owned one of those
<1> Can someone help me a bit pls
<1> ?
<2> burp
<3> ha ha ha
<3> Technojock++
<2> :)
<4> Gathond: I wouldn't know. I swore off buying anything with ATI in about 5 years ago after multiple bad experiences
<5> gathond: my ati has DRI support even. it works smooothly. but do you think this has to do with the monitor settings
<2> check please
<2> :)
<0> gnalb: might have
<5> ok, ive been using mandriva and slackware for some time now and am new to debian. i cant even find the setup utilities. what's the xsetup or just general setup utility in debian called?
<0> gnalb: try adjusting the refresh limits
<3> gnalb: ever considered reading the admin guide at www.debian.org ?
<0> smsie: funny, the last (not counting this laptop) I bought was an ATI because I swore off nvidia after their crappy driver annoyed me to death:)
<5> uh, no, but I am considering it now
<3> smart.
<4> Gathond: if there was One True Way, there'd only *BE* one way :)
<0> this laptops nvidia works fine though, but so does the ATI one on my radeon 9600 pro
<5> Debian Search disabled
<5> The Debian search engine has been disabled for now. We're working on it.
<4> use google
<5> anyone got radeon 9800 working?
<0> gnalb: dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg
<0> at least that is the case in unstable
<0> the package name might be different
<2> google: radeon site:debian.org
<0> I usually just use vim to hand edit the configuration file
<3> ye gods... www.debian.org -> Documentation -> manuals|HOWTOs|FAQs
<3> how fscking hard can that be?
<6> morning all
<3> yo Cynic
<6> hey Lion-O
<7> Lion-O: go to sleep. you have important work tomorrow
<6> if all spammers in the world died, i wouldn't be at all upset.
<3> Jostein: hmm ;)
<6> hey Jostein
<8> whyzzyrd, it is taking so long, that windows hasnt even given its estimate as to how long it is going to take
<7> hey Cynic
<4> Cynic: thrte's just be new spammers tomorrow
<3> Jostein: I won't be hanging around untill 4am (/perhaps/ with my ipaq) but its too early ;)
<9> right. me off, just popped in.
<4> spam is universal...you can't escape it
<4> although it is a LOT more prevalent than ity used to be
<3> smsie: you can. On an Apple (according to a co-workers friend) :)
<2> just don't use e-mail
<6> smsie: true, i just fondly remember a time when managing mail servers wasn't just about dealing with spam, spam, and spam. i realise it's reality now, it just ****s :(
<4> Lion-O: nah
<3> smsie: sure. it just magically goes away ;)
<4> Lion-O: I bet :)
<3> Well, the Apple /did/ manage to disrupt Adam :)
<2> hehe
<4> gmail manages to catch 99.9% of it...and hasn't managed a false positive for a fair while (about 6 months)
<6> I think OS X ships with Spam******in now
<2> that is why we lost paradise
<2> never mind
<2> date
<4> work
<4> eat
<2> but then in an other terminal
<4> sleep
<4> wear suncream
<6> drink
<6> smoke
<6> gamble
<2> and burping
<4> smoke some fags and play some pool
<4> pretend you never went to school
<2> good X
<2> what si so bad about a good old join flood
<2> *is
<4> it's annoying?
<2> well yeah
<2> besides that
<4> it's annoying?
<4> you don't want to annoy me
<4> "it annoys me" is a damn good reason not to do something
<2> fair enough :)
<4> you'll never fail like common people
<4> wou'll never watch your life slide out of view
<4> ****ing brilliant song
<2> what song is that
<4> a pity Jarvis is a complete twat...
<4> Common People
<4> pulp
<2> ah, that one
<10> Howdy Y'all
<2> howdy
<2> what ever that means
<10> I'm a geek that grew up with cowboys.
<2> they still have cowboys?
<8> we refer to them as queers these days
<2> hehe
<10> Wow, I was expecting a linux channel to be like.. Cool and tolerant.
<2> it is
<2> do you have the i-phone already?
<10> Gack. Ok, I'm leaving.
<11> Zollie: yeah... right, in which case you're an idiot
<10> I'm sorry, I was looking for a mature linux channel.
<2> :P
<3> He obviously never heard Bush; we're terroristic geeks :P
<2> hahahaha
<12> hmm, $475 to spend the night (2200-0800) running cable...
<13> not that bad
<13> :)
<12> not sure if i wanna spend all night doing it, though
<11> then again, P(that happening)=0
<7> K_F: anyway. it was the real deal that was working today
<5> ok, i got it fixed now
<11> Jostein: huh?
<12> K_F: already done that today
<7> K_F: not the imposter
<11> Jostein: aaaah
<11> Jostein: gotcha, took a moment to get the context :)
<11> or lack thereov
<11> or lack thereof
<7> K_F: had to ask her if it was me or her that was having useless work hours
<11> hehe, any answer?
<7> K_F: after me admitting to working 8-4, she told me I was the one with the bad hours :P
<11> :)
<5> ok, one quick question: when I load up X in 24 bit mode, before the background image loads (when there's the familiar white/black dotted background) I see that something isnt right...like, i there's some sort of ressonance pattern among the raster lines or however i should i call it. but once the background image loads up, i cant see it anymore
<5> this is gone in 16 bit mode. can this damage the monitor and is it a sign I should run X in 16-bit mode?
<5> it is completely unnoticeable once X has loaded up completely
<5> um. hello? did my internet connection unexpectedly quit on me again?
<7> as long as your refresh rates are the same, bit depth shouldnt matter the least
<5> hm. ok. they are
<5> but there is a difference when i load it, in the ressonance pattern of the white and black dots. but nothing else
<7> you might just have a ****ty graphics adapter :P
<7> anyway. the only thing your monitor cares about are the refresh rates
<7> everything else about the picture is analog, and thus your monitor shouldnt care
<5> ok
<5> hm. then there's the third question
<7> anyway. /me sod off
<7> you jane
<5> hold on hold on
<5> jane, as in "later" in japanese?
<7> talk to midnight and work tomorrow
<7> jane as in tarzan
<5> ok. 3 minutes to midnight
<5> mind talking in private for 2 min, since i am norwegian?
<7> I never say fod damn "ja ne~~" in here :P
<5> hehe
<5> well. thing is now: yesterday when i ran glxinfo, I had Direct Rendering: On
<5> when I did it now, it was set to Off
<5> but the only thing I have changed is the sync rates and the bit depth
<5> is there a way to FORCE it on, or, whatwhatwhat? why has it been turned off?
Return to
#linux
or
Go to some related
logs:
bjam sucks configure
ubuntu argentina mt810
c# clienttoscreen
ubuntu setting dnsdomainname
#windows
#MissKitten
#chatzone
#MissKitten
ircap esmas
What instrument did Glenn Miller play ?
|
|