| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Comments:
<0> ah, the terrible twos
<1> for a second i read tivos
<2> Sean: I'm just clicking on things....don't tell me to RTFM i know i should.
<2> What is CTCP ? =)
<0> I usually don't
<0> CTCP stands for Client To Client Protocol
<2> ...if i request yours then what is that good for ?
<0> something that runs over IRC
<0> it's just information
<0> the thing is, most of the time that information is collected to be used as an attack vector
<2> well it seems i've asked for your CTCP version and years later i got 'VERSION arrived' but nothing else.
<0> no, you asked for my USERINFO, and I asked for your VERSION
<2> well maybe i clicked wildly around :
<2> but still it says 'Tamahome VERSION'
<0> yes, I requested yours
<0> so it's telling you that someone made a request, namely, me
<2> ok i'll translate:
<2> Received CTCP VERSION from Tamahome.
<0> correct
<2> That means you sent a request ?
<0> yes
<2> ok
<2> Does the client need it to establish filetransfer ?
<0> for DCC? yes
<0> (mind, I have my own opinions about how horrible DCC is, having worked on an IRC client for Macintosh)
<2> And if i send you a DCC invitation then VERSION should be handled automatically, right
<0> not necessarily
<2> ...and anyway, what would you do if you've to get some files from someone quickly. Let's say for support.
<0> would be better to post them up on a webserver
<0> firewalls hate DCC
<2> yes, of course....
<2> but if you're already on IRC then DCC seems to be even more faster. to me.
<0> to get to from your comfy little chair maybe
<2> *lol*
<3> Yes, firewalls and DCC are mortal enemies.
<0> really, anything that uses ephemeral ports for incoming connections is evil
<2> So how do you kill'em?
<2> -->Cerulean
<3> You be the firewall admin. ;)
<0> the guy everyone hates the most
<1> oh, talking about me eh?
<2> well for some initially time they believe you it's all not your fault.
<3> Actually Tamahome has the right idea, the best way is if you have a FTP server both people can access and put the files there. FTP is faster and you're more likely to get an admin to let you open the ftp port than the ports needed for DCC
<0> yes Jon
<0> we've been badmouthing you all this time
<1> good
<1> carry on
<3> If you can't do that, then up on a website
<3> If that fails, burn them to CD and hoof it to the local USPS office. :)
<0> FTP is pretty bad too, unless you have a bandwidth shaper on FTP traffic
<2> well i don't like that FTP idea.
<3> Doesn't everyone?
<2> But upload on a site, ok, works always.
<0> Cerulean: I don't
<3> yeah, the site upload is your best bet
<2> Hey dudes, dudesses, i've gotta sleep now.
<0> so when I used to run an FTP server between a few friends, my link would get sapped something fierce
<2> Thanx for your support.
<3> I'm only kidding, I don't either, but ftp does seem to make best use of available bandwidth.
<0> that's why I said, a router that has traffic shaping is good for that
<3> Oh you mean FTP would **** up all your bandwidth? That's true.
<3> yeah
<2> Cerl: I've heard the protocl is slow but that is only in active mode right ?
<3> I keep meaning to tell the boss we should do that with our routers, but since I work second shift, I don't worry too much about it 'cause it just means all available bandwidth is MINE! ALL MINE! MUWAHAHAHAHHAA
<0> LOL
<2> ack
<3> Actually I couldn't say for sure, michl, I haven't noticed a speed difference in active vs. p***ive, I only get picky when a firewall won't let me through with one or the other.
<2> i've also tried rsync over ssh that's fast too.
<2> Faster than ftp, here
<4> Hmm. Bandwidth is expensive. If I were to have a million hits on a 30 second video clip in one month on one of these hosting packages, it'd cost like 0 in additional bandwidth costs.
<4> That ****s.
<0> Evii: OUCH!
<0> that's like $4000CAD or more
<3> lol, ouch
<1> evii but how much would you earn from google adsense?
<4> docfu: True, true. But it'd have to be over 2k ;)
<3> That's why I have to wonder how ratemyfaceadult.com makes it's money....
<3> Best porn on the 'net, some profiles have loong clips.. and you don't even have to register.
<4> How much do high traffic sites make in advertising, then?
<3> Let alone sign up for anything
<3> They must make a good bit of money on their advertising...
<3> 'cause the site is always fast.
<3> It's a helluva lot faster and more stable than, say, MySpace.com
<3> So they must have a decent pipe.
<2> ok, good bye, have a nice day (or night).
<3> G'night michl
<3> mmmmmm, anime
<4> I suppose you don't go with a ridiculously expensive hoster if you're providing free bandwidth, either.
<3> Oh that reminds me, I have Limewire on this thing now. I should go hentai hunting.
<4> Erm.
<4> If you're providing free content, rather.
<3> hehehehe
<3> If I won the lottery I'd start my own anime channel to compete with Adult Swim and the Anime Network
<1> tamahome you make the term 'addict' look good
<1> i'd just **** lots of hot chicks
<1> then die
<3> Or I'd buy the Cartoon Network and fire the entire Adult Swim staff and put lots of GOOD anime up at night
<0> if I wasn't ugly, I'd probably **** lots of chicks too
<3> rofl docfu, well yeah, that's a given
<5> any linux geek could recommend me a good ftp client?
<0> but I think I'd still watch anime
<1> anime isn't anime if its in english
<3> no, that's true, I much prefer my anime subtitled.
<0> most of the time
<3> Yeah, most of the time.
<0> there are a few *select* series that worked well as dubs
<3> There are a few that are p***able in English.
<0> yeah
<1> ghost in the shell is the only one i can think of
<0> Inu-Yasha isn't bad as a dub
<1> and only the original movie
<3> I like Full Metal Alchy as it is
<3> You don't like the GITS series?
<1> so whats a full metal alchemist?
<0> I only saw the first have of FMA
<1> no
<1> i ment its good dubbed
<0> s/have/half/
<3> But you said only the original movie
<1> i haven't seen the series dubbed
<3> Do you like the TV series?
<1> so i cna't say
<3> Oh ok
<0> Stand-Alone Complex dub was bad
<1> the subs were ok
<1> but it was just a corny tv show :)
<3> I liked it subbed better, but the ones I got had f'd up subs in the last few episodes of the first series.
<3> They got a little too philosophically complex for me in the first one.
<0> Cerulean: "m*** naked child events?"
<3> Hell the second series isn't proving to be much better.
<3> rofl Tamahome
<3> There were some comments along that line
<1> huh?
<0> Cerulean: result of a bad translation, it was supposed to be "m*** child abductions"
<3> If I hadn't seen the whole series dubbed first, I would've been totally lost in some episode.
<1> tamahome ahh
<3> Yeah, that's what I figured it was
<3> The subs I got for like 4 or the last 6 episodes were both A) Dubbed into Chinese and B) subbed so bad, I think they were double-translated (first from Japanese to Chinese, then to Engrish, badly)
<1> oh yeah i've seen that
<1> horrible translations
<1> ever seen the storm riders?
<1> "i'll defeat you with my sword 23"
<1> somebody ****ed up that one :)
<0> about 6 years ago when I saw Rurouni Kenshin, we had to watch the HECTO subs, this is long before digisubbing even existed so we were getting these mailed to us on videotape -- horrible quality, had those goofy Japanese commercials still mixed in, and the subtitle grammar was TERRIBLE
Return to
#linux
or
Go to some related
logs:
isabel.rar
#chatzone
orkut scripts
black bean steak chili
What Thames river bridge is nearest the Tower of London ?
CURLOPT_VERBOSE PHP no output
#AllNiteCafe
#chatzone
#mysql
convert unsigned char* to wstring
|
|