@# Quotes DB     useful, funny, interesting





Google
 
Web www.quotesdb.info
Undernet  |  EFnet  |  Quakenet  |  Freenode  |  Dalnet  |  Ircnet  |  Galaxynet
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13



Comments:

<0> fredk--, it seems that the player doesn't send any referrers
<1> might want to try different players
<0> what would you recommend?
<1> no idea
<1> dfgdfgdfg, also, perhaps a streaming server.. that would stop most people from downloading your stuff
<0> well, if you have no idea it's better to say nothing than suggesting stupid ideas
<1> dfgdfgdfg, hey **** you
<0> streamings are block in most company's networks in my country anyway
<0> very bad for people with slow connections
<0> ...
<2> what's a good vpn client for linux
<3> Chr1z: One that's compatible with the VPN server you want to connect to.
<2> whyzzyrd: just a simple linksys vpn router... what'd work?
<3> Chr1z: I've no idea what protocol it's using.
<4> As sands through the hourgl***, these are the day's of Steakk's life...
<2> whyzzyrd: 3DES encryption, SHA authentication



<3> Chr1z: vpnc?
<2> whyzzyrd: yea
<4> oh christ...no wonder that e-mail kept bouncing back....its .coM not .coN ... bounced back 4 times before I realized that
<4> http://bash.org/?665552
<4> alo db2 :)
<4> everytime I say db2, I think of the berkley database ...
<4> heh
<5> I think of the IBM Database..
<6> bwhahaha
<4> but, thats up to db4 now, isnt it?
<5> and it's not a pretty thought
<4> db2 is jsut oldskool
<4> :P
<7> Berkeley.
<4> Viking667, them too :P
<4> OH, totally OT here, but did you hear that the WRT54G V5 (the one that runs VxWorks) has had a successfull linux insatll on it? with NO hardware mods, and never opening the case?
<4> I read that today
<5> Steakk: yeah. the wrt-dd micro stuff atleast, unforutnatley the full deal
<5> .. remains to large
<6> weren't we talking about dd-wrt a few hours ago :)
<4> yeah, its gotta be the micro or lite versions, but still, its progress.
<4> db2: Well, I wasnt here a few hours ago, so, **** you :P
<4> I have a life you know...although, i try not to let it interfere with IRC
<4> wow, this reply to my ex's email (via myspace) has turned into a 3 page letter, and I still aint done
<4> no, not the ex-fiancee
<6> amazing, linksys sets the xmit power on the WRT54G to 28mw (dd-wrt can increase that to 251mw)
<8> do yourself a favor and dont increase tx power
<8> the broadcom radio is utter crap when you set tx power too high
<4> increase it to 251mw, so you can get wifi at 100% link quality from 3 miles away, heh
<6> well, i'd say going from 28mw to say 100mw would be a decent improvement
<8> and afaik i newer units it's limited to somewhere around 80mW max iirc, even though you can set it higher it wont go that high
<6> well, the default of 28mw is pathetic
<3> dogbert2: depends on the gain on the antenna
<7> Pretend you're a Ham operator, and doing it with the least possible.
<7> hi whyzzyrd
<8> it's 56mW EIRP, seems to be enough for most users
<4> Ham Operator? is that fancy terminology for Pig Farmer ?
<3> dogbert2: the regulatory limits are defined on EIRP, not input power
<8> provided their anteannas really have 3dBi
<6> dd-wrt says 70mw would be enough for most users, btw
<3> Steakk: no.
<4> db2: its at 28mw, so that you are required to go and buy the 'boosters' for it, along with the larger attenas, etc...then they (Linksys/Cisco) make more $ off of you
<8> even hams are not allowed to use more than 100mW EIRP here if i interpret current regulations right
<6> Steakk...no kidding, (linksys is being stupid about this)...
<3> tojoe: that's trivial actually.
<3> tojoe: I get 6dbi antennas for my aironets with no bother
<6> what's the standard antennas included with a WRT54G
<8> i have a bunch of 24dBi grids at the office collecting dust...
<8> dogbert2 2-3dBi, depending on whom you ask :p
<7> whoop de do.
<6> gah...
<3> dogbert2: no idea, but the rubber ducks on a AP1200 are 2.2dbi,
<5> tojoe: a ham isn't going to be allowed more bandwidth in a regulated band
<7> 24 db sounds good
<6> then the stuff on a wrt54g isn't gonna be better than 2bdi



<8> wlfshmn i know, but apparently some people here dont
<8> they posted about some links with 80W EIRP
<5> dogbert2: linksys themselves sell 7dBi antennas for the WRT54G.. so I ***ume that the ones provided are significantly worse
<3> tojoe: I wonder if they're aiming at 50mw EIRP, to stay within regulatory limts everywhere they sell the boxes?
<6> oooh, those linksys ****ers...check this **** out...
<6> WLA Advanced HTML section:
<6> When you look at the WLAdvanced HTML code I found these lines commented out
<8> whyzzyrd i guess they do, easier than having dozens of different firmwares for each country
<6> Transmit Power Control
<6> name=wl_txpower value='22'
<6> (Range:1~84)
<6> ***holes :)
<3> dogbert2: If you want something properly configurable, fsck off and buy an AP1242 from crisco.
<3> dogbert2: consumer-grade kit is just crap. Whoever you buy it from.
<8> i'm using lancom wherever i need something a bit better, cisco is just a tad too expensive
<6> whyzzyrd, I could do that, but I don't need $800 of AP where $60 + dd-wrt will do just fine :)
<3> dogbert2: indeed. But don't call linksys a bunch of ***holes, for making their consumer grade kit, consumer-grade.
<3> dogbert2: Can you imagine the mess if every bugger's wireless overlapped because they were all up at 100+mw?
<9> hi
<4> db2: too bad you cant use some sort of HTML injection in the URL of the linksys WRT series www admin panel ... IE: &wl_txpower=84 .. ya konw?
<9> I try to install mailman but I have some troubles
<6> whyzzyrd, they could have put in xmit power control...
<6> Steakk...no kidding
<8> dogbert2 what for? so every bum**** can break local regulations and get fined for it and turn it into a suit against linksys?
<3> dogbert2: It's *consumer-grade*. Jim who buys it from BestBuy doesn't want lots of bells,whistles and buttons. He doesn't understand them. That and he'd set everything at 170% of legal.
<6> tojoe, if dd-wrt can set the thing to 251mw, that's fine by me :), hell, my aironet 350 can do 200mw
<5> Odds of getting caught doing 200 in a 100mW zone? zero.
<4> haha
<5> Like the 'FCC actually monitoris jack all. Only way you are going to get nailed is if you manage to piss of a local HAM
<6> wlfshmn...yeah, and doing 200mw in a neighborhood getting cause (also zilch)
<5> cause?
<6> caught :)
<4> wlfshmn, and like, what are they going to do if you do get busted? throw you in jail? I think not...prolly a simple slap ont he wrist and "turn that down!"
<10> I think he meant caught
<6> hell, even 70mw (as dd-wrt suggests) isn't un-reasonable
<8> there have been some screenshots of spectrumanalyer measurements of the bmc radio at higher tx power, didnt look that great
<5> Steakk: they migtht confiscate the device
<4> seriously? thats ****ed up
<4> they better pay me the $40 I paid for it! heh
<6> wlfshmn...my guns will put a stop to that **** :)
<5> Steakk: Sure. They'll deduct it from the 250$ fine. Honest.
<4> db2: I can just picture you holding a gun to the FCC's head...
<4> wlfshmn, LoL
<4> wlfshmn, thats why my wifi router is in another apartment...THEY will get busted for the increased tx, not me :)
<4> what? heh
<5> nah, anyway, just don't go insane with output power.. use what you need, no more. look at it as a security risk ;)
<6> wlfshmn...nod, but I don't think 28mw to 70mw is a big deal :)
<7> as I said, pretend you're an Amateur Radio operator. "Enough, and no more"
<5> WPA2 might not have been crasked yet, but that isn't going ot last forever
<4> db2: hell, i'd prlly get that signal here ... whast your WEP/WPA key? I'll tap into it :P
<5> actually.. the reason linksys sets power that low might be to be able to sell those range-expanded models at twice the price ;)
<6> bwhahahaha...
<6> 50,000W wifi :)
<8> 28mW to 70mW is just 4dBm, better done with a decent antenna
<5> dogbert2: hwo do you like your nads? hardboiled?
<4> db2: ****, that'd go around the world...twice ... you could tap into it AFTER it goes around once, and still have 100% link quality
<6> wlfshmn...i've been working with computer **** for 24 years, my nads are still werking
<4> hrmm...I thought I had another pack of ciggs...DAMNIT
<4> only 2 ciggs left ... gonna have to hit up the gas station soon
<5> dogbert2: had any kids lately? ;)
<6> hehehehe
<4> dn2: WANT any kids? heh
<6> the HGA kit from linksys is 65 bucks (egad)
<6> of course, they are 7dbi
<4> Chalupa!
<4> yeah, i said it
<6> hehehehe
<4> ataX will always be a chalupa to me
<11> hey Teakk
<11> db2.
<11> Chalupa is a mexican food.


Name:

Comments:

Please enter the result of the sum 63 + 46 (to avoid spam):






Return to #linux
or
Go to some related logs:

#skype
seksy and funy
#networking
glibc detected *** double free or corruption (!prev): 0x
#linuxhelp
cheilou
#windows
anastasia spjun
slow I/O gentoo
#linux



Home  |  disclaimer  |  contact  |  submit quotes