| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
Comments:
<0> That's a bad idea.
<1> Not the US.... Gah I was still using the Russia example.
<0> So you live in Tuscon? And Russian tech still has Tuscon preset into it? That doesn
<0> 't shock me.
<2> Americans are a big joke. I like them.
<0> Glad to make your day.
<2> :D
<1> Personally I cant wait for WW3 really gets off the ground. Then I can sit there and watch with humor as all my ideas are either proven right or wrong
<3> lol
<0> You won't be around to find out. You'll be dead, too/
<2> syn-ack: you won't be watching for long
<2> I, instead... i'll be laughing out loud
<1> hell I think its been going on since we invaded Iraq the first time around
<0> That was hardly a war.
<0> It's more of a war now than it was during the first few months of initial warfare.
<1> Im talking about everything thats happened since then... hell maybe even since the late 70's even
<4> MarchHare: You're missing the point
<5> s/on/an/
<1> Coma: Hell, I dont want to feel it
<0> I'm good at missing the point. Care to clarify it for me?
<5> syn-ack: There'll only be this little gust of wind is all ;)
<2> aw i'm ****ing freezing
<1> Coma: May I come live with you?
<1> I can be your nightlight
<5> Sure, we'll have a spare room in a month or so
<5> haha
<2> would you care to send a nuke a few km's from here to heat things up?
<1> Shadur: I know this whole thing is going to explode. The question is when.
<6> John!
<5> Morning, Eric
<6> Coma: how goes?
<5> Nanuq: Too early to tell, worked half way through the night to get everything going on my cobalt ;)
<7> syn-ack: Well, Bush has thoughtfully provided every two-bit militant nation in the world with a set of matches and a fuse by so utterly overextending the US military resources that it's rapidly becoming obvious that he doesn't have anything left to respond to any kind of new threat /with/ short of launching nukes.
<5> Nanuq: You found any drinkable larger yet? =)
<7> Which even most of his remaining supporters would see as somewhat rash.
<6> Coma: nah
<6> Coma: cobalt? aren't those a little.. old?
<1> Im sure Pat Robertson likes that idea, Shadur.
<0> Shadur: Which country is that, may I ask?
<1> MarchHare: How about any of them in world since everyone hates us ATM
<6> feh
<7> MarchHare: The netherlands.
<0> That's their problem if they hate us to the point that they'll get invaded.
<6> I get 70ms from here to my flat, and 40ms to yahoo. guess which one is physically closer? ;)
<7> If you don't believe me, google for the "Invasion of The Hague Act"
<2> The netherlands fingered for potential invasion?
<0> The Netherland most certainly never got fingered for invasion, except maybe by comedians.
<1> MarchHare: You're pretty ****ing ignorant.
<2> It's the american way of being
<1> Sturgeon: Im an American and I dont even think like that.
<7> MarchHare: Do you realize how retarded that "If we invade them, it was obviously their fault" statement is?
<2> Hey, i'm on a spree with americans :D
<2> syn-ack: I'm talking about your standard Joe.
<0> Ok, that law, from what I can tell, basically states that the US will not have it's sovereignity adjudicated away.
<6> Coma: I'm going to have to write a complaint letter to Shure.
<7> MarchHare: The "reasoning" for the act, in as much as you can call that kind of stupidity "reason", is that evil anti-american furriners intend to use the International Criminal Court as a kangoroo court to convict US citizens.
<6> Coma: These earphones are too good, they're making me want to ditch all my lossy compressed music.
<7> MarchHare: Yes, god forbid that the US would be required to play by the same rules everyone else agrees to play by.
<6> lossyily?
<6> lossily!
<0> Personally, I don't think that court should exist at all.
<0> Let the countries convict their own.
<5> Nanuq: It's lossy, isn't it?
<7> MarchHare: The authors of that little piece of jingoistic arrogance were experts at cooking bull**** and appealing to the ignorant.
<7> MarchHare: And what if they don't?
<6> Coma: bloody mp3s!
<0> What else is new? Sounds like politicians to me.
<6> Coma: music compressed in a lossy fashion, vs using something like FLAC
<6> Coma: actually the AAC stuff is okay
<7> Oh, right. That's when you invade. War solves everything and should be used as the first option at all times.
<1> AAC is awesome
<5> Nanuq: Stil not lossless though
<6> syn-ack: aacPlus rocketh even more
<0> War does what it was meant to do. It's human nature to wage war.
<1> Shadur: Of course, I mean Bush thinks that the case s o he must be right
<1> Nanuq: I know, XM uses aac+ as their transmission standard
<2> MarchHare: Yeah, it's human nature to wage war. Let's wage war.
<7> MarchHare: It's also human nature to be stupid. This does not make it a virtue.
<0> It really doesn't matter who's in charge of what country. They're all the same.
<2> "they" what?
<2> or who
<7> ... Right, I think I've heard enough stupidity for one day.
<1> Nanuq: have you seen the wikipedia on aac?
<6> syn-ack: no?
<1> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Audio_Coding
<1> Nanuq: Rather interesting read.
<1> I actually like AAC over ogg.
<7> [10:11] <0> I hate to say it, but kick/banning me shows more closed-mindedness on your part than any failing on mine. I weep for the future.
<4> Shadur: My flatmates loved your line about studity and human nature
<1> heh
<6> syn-ack: yeah, plus it'll actually work on my iPod
<6> ****in' hell
<6> just had to fish the insert thingy out of my ear canal, again
<8> It has some of the same keymappings as irssi, which is extremely annoying when you have the wrong window activated
<6> Jostein: which is that?
<9> hi Nanuq
<10> BattleNet: not yet.
<6> Jostein: rather, what does that extension do?
<8> Nanuq: you rate sites "thumbs up" or "Thumbs down" when you visit them.
<8> Nanuq: then after a while you have enough statistics gathered
<8> Nanuq: so you can just click "stumble" and you'll stumble upon a site you havent been to before, that others with similar ratings have liked
<6> syn-ack: never even heard of AAC LD before
<1> I know, neither have I. Thats what I think is so interesting
<1> Nanuq: I think thats what XM uses to broadcast
<11> salz
<11> e cineva on line ?
<7> mickrob: English, please.
<11> k
<11> hy
<11> Shadur
<11> i have a question pls
<11> SunOS or Solaris it is the same ?
<6> syn-ack: nah, HE-AAC more likely
<7> mickrob: Try to avoid hitting the enter key so often, it makes you sound kind of stupid.
<11> hey
<7> mickrob: I fail to see how that's relevant to linux.
<6> syn-ack: AAC LD would be used for VoIP, say
<1> aha
<6> syn-ack: except the h.* standards are already widely used
<11> aha ?
<1> right
<6> syn-ack: I guess if you really want high definition telephony ;)
<11> is the same
<11> so SunON=Solaris
<7> mickrob: I didn't say they were.
<11> just the name has chage ?
<1> ./kick mickrob **** off you clueless twat
<11> just the name has change ?
<7> All I'm saying is that neither of them has anything to do with linux, so I fail to see why you keep asking in here.
<7> Go to #sunos or #solaris and ask them.
<11> k
<11> thx
<1> Nanuq: I wouldnt mind a HD telephone. That would be kinda cool, I think
<6> syn-ack: anyhow, SBR is the thing that makes HE-AAC/aacPlus work ;)
<6> syn-ack: sorta nifty to actually hear the difference kick in. does that every so often when I connect to a stream
<6> syn-ack: www.tuner2.com, in case you've never seen that
<1> Hrm
<1> tuner2.... I like.
<6> syn-ack: yeah, somafm offers most of their streams via aacPlus
<6> syn-ack: I'm still amazed how decent 48kbps is
<8> well.. it may be decent -for 48kbps, but I seriously doubt you can recreate 1500kbps of detail with a 48kbps stream
<8> no matter how good compression you have
<8> But then again, I think 128kbps MP3s sound like junk. heh
<6> Jostein: I'm not saying it's perfect
<6> Jostein: just that for streaming purposes, and given that much bandwidth, it's ****in' amazing
Return to
#linux
or
Go to some related
logs:
#mirc
#skype
#asm
DocumentBuilder parse memory leak
bhaigroup
conturstrike
#AllNiteCafe
#linux
masterxxxpasswords how
deviantnet
|
|