| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3
Comments:
<0> you use sciTE Pilum?
<1> hard to say, the wtp one work soso, only have code complete for built in object, no error flagging. color coding look good enough
<2> Yes.
<1> I never need a lot of functions from the editor,love color coding, getting spoiled by problem flag, no real need for code completion. waiting for js eclipse's autoformat
<3> frontpage rocks
<3> no no, use Interdev...i love how it converts all my HTML tags to uppercase
<0> textpad is reasonably good but I like these new-fangled apps taht help you keep track of your variables, functions, parameters, etc etc etc
<1> sukotto: it won't work. you still need different tools
<0> been focusing heavily on JS lately
<0> Yeah, I'm afraid you're proably right. But learning new keybindings for different editors ****s
<1> i am using eclipse for coding, ultraedit for quick read/editing, vs.net for debugging. some homesite/dreamweaver for page editing as well
<3> whats good in eclipse?
<1> Pilum: eclipse is fast enough if you have enough ram.
<3> is there any that will autocomplete javascript commands?
<1> nothing :) but js eclipse is one of the better js editor out there.
<0> JSEclipse claims it will do everything... and have your babyu
<2> 4GiB?
<1> I have 1.3 now
<2> Crazy with an app that uses more ramp than the entire desktop application + the OS.
<1> wait until you start the jboss and start stepping the codes
<0> on the other hand... I feel suspicious of an editor that lists "line wrapping" as a feature. (padding our features list are we?)
<3> lol
<2> Heh.
<1> the code complete in js eclipse is the best one out there, with problem flagging, other than that, nothign special
<4> what's the use of dynamic data types in javascript?
<1> ...
<4> you'd still need to know how to write your functions to work with them
<4> right?
<4> as an op I expect a comment and quick
<4> I understand you are here of your own accord
<1> yes, you still need to know what kind of data you dealing
<0> PutItak : Letting your IDE write your code you you is a mistake.
<4> ht311 : then why even giving the user this feature? isnt it dangerous?
<0> s/you you/for you/
<4> sukotto : what do you mean by that? dynamic data types are also a mistake, they can cause big problems
<0> misread your question.
<4> what's the use of this feature?
<1> not strongly typed dosen't it is a free lunch for you to write any crazy code
<4> I see, then its simply wrong
<1> "10" + 10 -> "1010" , no need for "10" + 10.toString()
<4> thats simply javascript's interpretation of the + sign isnt it?
<1> may be you are right it is a bad example.
<4> I guess it can simply make the code easier to write and manipulate at times
<4> and since its runtime it can also be used to save memory (not allocate the type until you need it)
<4> right?
<4> im simply trying to look for arguements FOR this type of programming
<4> I like debating things with other people, if you dont like me to do it in here just say so dont ignore me
<1> sure it is easier to write compare to strongly typed language. since there is no function overloading, this behavior will be needed
<5> i'd rather just ignore ya ;)
<4> [Torgo] but thats rude and uncivilized
<5> your point?
<4> I dont like you to act like that
<5> that's nice
<1> myfunction(blah) vs myfunctiontakeInt(myint) and myfunctiontakeString(myString)
<4> why is there no function overloading?
<4> because there are no real "types" ?
<5> no types?
<4> torgo : the types are changing dynamically anyway
<4> thats what I meant
<5> only by your own hand
<4> yes but they change depending on the values you ***ign them
<4> just tell me why there is no function overloading
<5> by the values *you* ***ign to them
<5> PutItak, ask the designers
<4> you cant answer this question?
<5> I DIDN'T DESIGN THE LANGUAGE
<4> I expected someone who considers himself a javascript expert to answer this question
<5> are you an idiot?
<4> ignored
<4> ht311 are you still here?
<5> done
<2> "Mommy, why is the sky blue?"
<5> how long was *that* going on?
<0> about 10 minutes
<5> you guys have way more patience than I ;)
<0> X doesn't listen to me :-)
<3> who is dkadrios
<3> oo [Torgo]
<3> [Torgo] is patient because he's a good programmer
<3> *better programmer
<5> patient? hardly
<3> oh i meant *impatient (pardon my extreme lack of sleep)
<3> the worse you program, the more it frustrates and makes you patient
<3> im gonna eat and nap. ciao
<2> Strange.
<2> Seems to have the oposite effect on me heh.
<0> patience implies better programmer. doesn't work the other way around
<1> all I know is pressure make good code monkey
<1> spammer alert!
<1> :P
<6> piss off
<1> by the psp?
<6> ?
<0> once again wishing X would listen to me :-)
<1> you can wish, just wish
<0> meh, I've been an op. Too much h***le
<3> its h***le for bad ops
<3> but for fine ops, its a blessing
<2> Hard to ban NeoFu7ure though. :-)
<0> who said ban? :-) friendly kick however...
<6> umm why you banning me
<6> yeah im a little high up in the pecking order if i remember rightly ;)
<6> yeah im still 499 ;)
<2> A little high is an understatement hehe
<6> lol
<7> someone here had a CRM WebSite?
<7> CRM = Customer Relations Manager
<6> me me me
<8> No JS questions anymore?
<6> yah
<7> how long did it take you NeoFu7ure to do it?
<6> the site or the CRM ?
<7> 1 year, 6 months, 1 month, 2 weeks?
<7> erm.. both?
<6> CRM is about 2 years work
<6> http://my.oceanworksuk.net/products/
<6> were just redesigtning the site
<7> the CRM must be part of the website no?
<6> no its a seperate entity
<7> there's a backend?
<0> meh, I don't read Lorem Ipsum
<6> http://affinity.owuk.net
<6> demo/demo
<6> (in IE)
<7> yes thats the site..
<7> what happens in FireFox?
<6> http://my.oceanworksuk.net/testimonials/
<6> ok ignore the lorum
<6> it will bork FF (at the moment)
<3> oceanworkSuk.net
<6> yeah thats why were chaning companie
<6> companies
<0> you also have syntax errors in your newcss.css file (lines 9, 35, 43, 45)
<6> were now known as Affinity GO Ltd
<6> sukotto its a prototype design ignore that
<6> www.affinitygo.net
<1> that's why he is not an op in #css :D
<3> Phd design!
<6> http://www.phddesign.co.uk/
<6> we DIDNT design there site
<3> so u had nothing to do with the spinning logo
<6> no
<6> we do work for there clients
<3> my prospective client today asked me to atleast make him a logo animation for his website if i don't have time to do the whole website
<1> he will ask you for a flash next time
<0> the road to hell is paved with animation
Return to
#javascript
or
Go to some related
logs:
chat without x-windows in linux
#linux
yannlord
suse 10.1 pam_ldap
#linux
#linuxhelp
lahwa
#c++
#javascript
undernet.xs4all.nl.6667
|
|