| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2
Comments:
<0> I am trying to change an image. It works fine in IE, but in firefox the image won't change
<1> uninstall firefox then
<1> hehehe
<0> blasphemy
<0> I'm using this line document.getElementById("image").src=document.getElementById("filename_"+pos).innerText;
<2> innerText doesn't work in moz, it's IE only
<3> [Torgo], the site still have caching issue, after a post , when it go back to the home page, it didn't see the updated forum posts
<4> very likely
<4> in order to fix the image flickering in the example pages i needed to enforce caching everywhere
<3> i trying to push down that license post off the front page :D
<4> hrrm
<4> grumble grumble
<3> he may have his point, jsut start off with a very wrong foot
<4> that really made my day :/
<2> yeah, not very cool
<3> if he say that in the channel, you already slap/kick/ban him :)
<4> guess he doens't quite grasp the amount of work that went into writing 4.0
<4> what would be my motivation to work on it for 3 years and then just give it away?
<4> ridiculous
<3> hope it won't need 3 years for 5,0 ;)
<3> 1 more post to go
<2> hey [Torgo] i just watched March of the Penguins and I hate to say it but the bub has some stiff competetion from those baby penguins when it comes to cuteness.
<4> lol
<4> don't eg him on ;)
<3> http://www.cuteoverload.com/
<2> http://justalittleguy.blogspot.com/
<4> sheesh, you guys need a hobby
<4> don't make me pull out the baby elmo pic
<4> http://www.spinning-jennie.com/cats/elmo.htm
<2> in china you are allowed one child and two pandas: http://www.pandafix.com/photos/uncategorized/1179.jpg
<2> hehe, new cat? that is pretty cute, better put it up on http://www.kittenwars.com
<3> missio accomplish, that post is off the front page now. ;)
<4> :P
<4> if it gets out of hand, i reserve the right to delete it altogether
<4> nite
<5> hello.. what is the good syntax to use the active form elements ?
<5> i don't want to precise the name of my form in forms['name']
<3> there is no concept of active element
<3> you can set that manually by handling onfocus on the fields
<5> onfocus on the <form> and use a JS variable ?
<4> you may be able to get away with one event on the form, yes
<3> yes, and check srcElement of the event (different in FF)
<4> failing that you'll need to attach an event to every element using a loop
<5> ok i see
<5> thanks you for your help.. it's appreciate
<6> salutations matinales / morning greetings
<7> hi all
<8> is it possible to upload files with ajax ?
<9> Doubt it.
<9> You could probably upload file content though and have your serverside script create the file.
<9> However, it wouldn't be like regular file upload.
<8> ok how would i get the file content for posting ?
<9> Copy&paste. :-P
<9> You could always try with a regular file input.
<10> Anyone know of a way to do something PHP's Variable Variable in javascript? basically... got a function func(var) which is called with something like func(SOME_CONSTANT), so I get the content of SOME_CONSTANT in my var param, however... I need to know the constant as well... ideas?
<11> I can't understand
<3> skins: you need to stop thing there is relationship between your severside script and javascript in the browser. from js point of view, all it want to know is var abc="blah"; now , you need to make the serverside to output that. var abc="${myjava_var}"; (<-jsp syntax here, replace with your php syntax
<3> s/thing/thinking
<12> can anyone tell me if there is a way to increase font size or bold text within a confirm popup window?
<3> no
<12> so just plain text is my only option?
<3> yes
<12> bummer!
<12> thanks anyways!
<13> Hi, I am working on a page where I can add div's with javascript (that works okay, i can set all the attributes I want, like height,bgcolor,...), but I want to add some onMouseOver and onMouseDown event handlers (specific for each div) to the DIV I add. How can I do that?
<2> divRef.onmouseover = function (){//your code here}
<13> and should it be document.getElementById(divid).onmouseover
<2> sure, that's fine
<13> hmmm, I first do: newdiv = document.createElement("div");
<13> then newdiv.onMouseOver=function(){alert("blaat"); and then document.body.appendChild(newdiv);
<13> and the layer gets added, I can see it, but when I go with my mouse over it nothing happens
<9> ***uming you didn't forget the last } in your code, that's just about right
<2> onmouseover needs to be lowercase
<9> Yes. Lowercase
<13> lowercase?
<9> Yes.
<13> why is that? isnt the correct syntax OnMouseOver ?
<9> No.
<9> Never was.
<13> ah... where did I get that then?
<9> That's just something some people did to make it easier to read.
<13> ah ok
<9> You don't have to do it that way in HTML either. HTML isn't case sensitive after all. :-)
<13> ok
<13> with onmouseover it works now. thanks
<2> xhtml is case sensitive, so you're better off in the long term to leave it lowercase
<9> Indeed
<13> okay. Another problem: When i add a div manually (so I really type it into the HTML code), and I add this: onMouseUp="ReleaseLayer(this.id);" it works, but when I do in the JS this: newdiv.onmouseup=function(){ReleaseLayer(this.id);} it doesnt work (i cant move the layer). Why is that?
<13> (the ReleaseLayer function works correctly)
<9> Why do you p*** the id btw?
<9> If you use the id for getElementById, then you might as well just p*** the reference.
<13> ah yes
<9> As for the question... function() { ReleaseLayer(newdiv.id); }
<9> Or just ReleaseLayer(newdiv) if you follow my advice. :-)
<13> I will add that later, its a good one
<13> but for function() { ReleaseLayer(newdiv.id); }, it doesnt work neither
<13> I now have this: newdiv.onmousedown=function() { PickupLayer(newdiv.id); }
<2> that's no good because newdiv won't be anything when the function is called
<2> i'm never sure of the syntax, but you need something like newdiv.onmousedown=function(arg){PickupLayer(arg.id)} if you know what i'm saying. pilum or definitely fatbrain should be able to elaborate.
<13> http://cpp.enisoc.com/pastebin/6653 here is the piece of code thats relevant (for actually adding the layer)
<9> Should apply the functions after you've added it to the body.
<2> yeah, i agree with pilum
<13> k
<2> back in 20
<13> It still doesnt work: I posted some more code here: http://cpp.enisoc.com/pastebin/6654
<13> hmm, never mind, it isnt in the event handlers
<13> the functions are cales (i tested it with an alert() inthe function)
<13> Okay, I got it, the clou was that I had to add the newdiv.position="absolute" to the new layer...
<14> it's the reference to the object from within the function
<14> ah
<3> i hope you mean newdiv.style.position = "absolute"
<13> yes
<13> I meant that, sorry
<13> Is there an opposite of document.body.appendChild ? (I suppose so :) )
<15> .removeChild
<2> .asplodeChild
<13> ok
<15> heheh
<2> better go with RoBorg's choice ;-)
<15> mine is safe for indoor use
<13> :)
<3> is hot today in montreal ...
<2> yup
<2> in an hour i'll know if i'm going back to work next week.
<13> can you overload functions in JS?
<13> like in JAVA?
<3> no
<13> pitty :(
<3> but you can detect have you p*** in a certain parameter
<3> function a(p1,p2) {} .... you can just call it with a(myp1);
<13> ah ok
<3> furtive: you sign the contract just in time ;)
<2> yup
<16> persons = xmlDoc.getElementsByTagName("name"); persons.length returns 2 but persons[0].nodeValue returns null despite the XML element containing cdata "Sanchez"
<2> i don't know of any tag called <name>
<4> xml
<4> JasonMog, what parser?
<13> I am making a fairly big Javascript application, that is supposed to be ran from the internet. Now I have 6 different .js files with the functions in, so I easily know wich function is where. Is that good, or should the number of .js files be limited?
<4> Joske, that's good
<2> yeah. you can pick and chose what needs to be included in which page.
<4> JasonMog, try without nodeValue
<13> ok... But I need every file on every page (it is becomming some kind of windows like GUI, with windows etc, so there is just 1 "page")
<13> but then I will continue splitting up the files inthe future
<4> great idea, they will be cached
<13> Is there another argument against NOT using global variables in JS besides the regular ones that are there for any language?
<4> used responsibly there is no problem with them
<4> you're better off placing them in your own namespace though
<4> like var globals = {}; globals.mySetting = 123;
<13> ah yeah, that is indeed safer
Return to
#javascript
or
Go to some related
logs:
#php
#php
funnyinside;com
#AllNiteCafe
#linux
#AllNiteCafe
reddiena
What sport was Boris Onishchenko caught cheating at in the Montreal Olympics ?
#c
shrunkgirl
|
|
