@# Quotes DB     useful, funny, interesting





Google
 
Web www.quotesdb.info
Undernet  |  EFnet  |  Quakenet  |  Freenode  |  Dalnet  |  Ircnet  |  Galaxynet
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6



Comments:

<0> i am all for sharing, i believe the world is moving to adapte this model, i don;t mind to pay some small $ for me to have access
<1> i'd bet my pants they're not paying any taxes on the income either
<1> ht311, nor do i. paying 20 bucks for a cd isnt cool. 2 might be.
<0> the key is access. while drm is total in reverse
<0> it just make people go the other way
<2> how can i edit an image's properties if its being generated dynamically?
<1> yup, i just wanted to plant the idea that the boys behind tpb might not be the knights in golden armour after all
<0> i pay for my cabel and stuff, not cheap at all. but download the tv anyway. not different from i put in on tape,
<1> i cant say anthing for sure, but im quite damn sure that they're lifting some serious cash of it.
<3> grazzy: my guess is, you'r right, if there's an oppertunity to make money, they'r most likely apt to take it
<3> I wouldn't turn down *easy-money*
<0> I am not surprise, but not too upset.
<3> not that I would distribute .torrents for a living either.
<0> like open source, to me it is a big marketing scheme
<3> neither am I, can't say I have any preference towards tpb, I'm more concerned how the antipiratebureau (spelling) is going about with their business.



<0> yup. hope canada will be able to stay away from this copyright law crap
<0> i think france and sweden will be doing fine
<0> someday, there will be alien come to earth to sue us about stealing their technology
<4> how do I define a default value for a function prameter?
<4> like function myFunc(xVar=null) { .. }
<0> that will be funny, there is no point to pay them off with usd$
<0> if(!xval) xval="mydefault";
<4> thanks
<0> there is pitfall, you will find out
<3> xVar = xVar || defaultValue; // usually does the trick.
<3> (and I like my way better than what ht311 just wrote :P)
<3> because they are the same, and I don't have to use an if-statmenet ;)
<0> ah, i use both, not remember the ||
<3> but as ht311 pointed out, there are pitfalls.
<4> heh :) his version was better, I have to ***ign some stuff only if that variable is used, so I was going to set the default to null anyhow
<0> no , fatbrain version is faster and cleaner
<4> if (xVar) do_stuff_here; is faster :)
<3> sk8ing: why would that be faster?
<4> than xVar=xVar || defValue;
<4> if (xVar==defValue) do_stuff;
<4> tho, should that be xVar = xVar | defValue; ?
<3> no
<4> than xVar=xVar?xVar:defVal;
<4> ?
<4> won't this xVar=xVar || defValue; set xVal to bool ?
<3> no, xVar = xVar || defVal;
<3> no
<5> Sorry for interrupting. Is it possible to have several objects with the same ID so that when changing Object's parameter By id all of the will change? Is this a stupid question?
<0> yes it is
<3> xVar = xVar (evalutaes-xVar, if it evaulates to <true> it will *return* xVar, otherwise it will *return* defaultValue)
<3> in, xVar = xVar || defaultValue; // that is.
<5> would be nice though
<4> hmm... a lil weird, it shouldn't act like that
<3> sk8ing: ofcourse it should.
<4> it complicates things
<3> sk8ing: read the ecma262-specification
<3> sk8ing: no it doesn't.
<6> i've got a flash+javascript problem
<6> it's on http://www.macromedia.com/software/flash/flashpro/
<4> in my opinion, the way to do it, would be the x?x:y style
<0> i use e = e || window.event a lot
<6> in the View the feature tour flash movie. when you press the button, the movie resizes. is it?
<4> and the || should evaluate to bool
<3> sk8ing: why should || be evaulated to bool?
<4> because it's a boolean operator
<3> sk8ing: and why would it complicate things if it doesnt?
<4> well let's say I need true or false
<3> ok, I'm listening.
<0> it is a logical or . nothing about boolean
<4> x = b || y;
<4> x == true if b or y is set
<4> false if not
<3> yes
<3> when you say *true* you mean that it's some value that may be evaulated as true.
<3> x = 1 || 2; alert(x) => 2
<4> no :) that's the point



<3> if(2) { alert("yes, 2 is true"); }
<4> boolean true and boolean false
<3> sk8ing: you'r not making sense.
<4> not the value
<4> cuz I may have an if statament like this one: if (x==true)
<4> not if (x)
<3> and?
<3> if(1 == true) { alert("also true"); }
<4> both are fine
<4> I know that
<3> as I said, you'r not making sense.
<4> but it confuses stuff
<3> It's you that's adding the confusion.
<4> ok... let's put it this way
<4> I'm a c++ guy, if you wouldn't told me now that x = x || y; returns something else than boolean I could be using that if (x==false)
<4> that
<4> thats' because you don't always know the type of the variables that are p***ed to you
<4> and you don't check it all the time
<3> sk8ing: why would you have to check the type of the variable?
<4> function myalert(x) { if (x==true) alert("blah"); else alert(x); }
<4> myalert(true); myalert('boom');
<3> ?
<3> sk8ing: is this leading to something?
<4> yes
<3> ok, I'm waiting.
<4> well I can use two types of variables
<4> now
<4> just a moment
<4> to develop a bugous function :)
<3> sure, take your time
<3> gives me some time to fetch some coffee.
<4> heh, it eats the calcium from your bones
<4> :P
<6> help.. please?
<2> if i wanted to get a list of all the images on my page, how would i do that?
<2> i was thinking document.image.all might put em all in arrays.
<6> anybody?
<4> if myalert looks like this myalert(x) { x=x||y; if (x==true) alert(y?y:"boom"); else alert("blah"); }
<4> var y="lalalal"; myalert(false); should alert "lalalala" not "boom", but it alerts "boom"
<4> sorry
<4> it alerts blah
<4> myalert("dafkddskjf"); will alert blah also
<3> yes, ofcourse, that's one of the pitfalls.
<4> eh, it's not that bad
<3> the only way to, use optional arguments is to check for typeof(x) == "undefined"
<0> the only fool proof way
<4> yeah but I guess that can slow it a lil :)
<0> speed is the last thing you worry about in these issues
<3> indeed.
<4> true
<7> this ice tea tastes like bile
<0> add some booze in it, it will make it taste good
<0> don't want to cook tonight ...
<0> that's not bad
<7> it'll keep the little lady happy.


Name:

Comments:

Please enter the result of the sum 63 + 46 (to avoid spam):






Return to #javascript
or
Go to some related logs:

t
b64dck
#c++
#squid
www.coolmp3.ro
apache2 mod_includes issues
#linux
dj sejjer
#linux
atax bash.org



Home  |  disclaimer  |  contact  |  submit quotes