| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3
Comments:
<0> s/tubling/tumbling
<0> underwater? jeeze!
<1> hi examancer
<2> they need to make more like this
<0> man. put this on imax and i'd pay $20
<3> agree, i want the see the mars landing one :)
<0> this is the one i'm talking about, hit play video and make sure you have audio on
<0> http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/c***ini/multimedia/pia08117.html
<3> i want to see the huge air bag rolling on mars surface
<4> heya exacube
<0> the casini one gets better as it gets closer... the pic starts zooming in
<0> i just wish it wasn't a small QT window
<2> link to hi-res at the bottom
<0> man, the booster separation happens just before 3min into the video, you can do a "prepare for boster separation in 10, 9, 8..." ...soo good
<2> at 5:17 you can see the contrail
<1> so
<1> i figured out how scriptaculous does the slideup effect
<1> and slidedown
<1> without having to specify what the height of the container is
<1> there's a javascript element that does that.. found out today
<1> document.getElementById("mydiv").offsetHeight;
<1> you just get the height from that, keep decreasing the height every few miliseconds to make the effect
<4> anyone got a simple way to check if a specific element ID exists on a page?
<5> exacube could u figure out what scriptaculous does when it sends params to the .js include?
<2> examancer, if(document.getElementById("whatever")){ ... }
<4> cool, thanks
<4> wasn't sure if you could bool test that or not. thats perfect
<1> well, it returns NULL if it doesn't exist, so that's false
<1> or an object if it does, so that's true :p
<1> SufiBlade: No way am I going through that huge chunk of code
<1> hold on, i've got an idea
<1> <3 MDC
<1> SufiBlade: use DOMi that comes with a Mozilla browser
<5> and what abotu on IE?
<1> IE ****s
<1> i don't know why you would want to mention that. you just ruined my day
<5> because i work just to please myself, and i wont get paid if i dont satisfy the audience (which is majority IE)
<5> that didnt make sense. add: i wont be pleased if i dont get paid much
<1> heh
<1> IE doesn't have a DOM inspector built-in, but im sure you'll find something related to it if you google
<1> just get firefox and use DOM Inspector..
<5> i do use FF and Opera
<5> but no am i going through that code either
<3> I LOVE IE
<3> you can get the IE developer toolbar
<3> or just use the vstudio
<3> nite
<5> what! an op just said that
<5> 'nite
<6> what's the HTML to make a redirection to other page instantly?
<5> there is none, unless #html folks know a way
<7> window.location in an inline script at the top of the page
<5> thats not HTML
<6> meta re-direct
<7> Sufi - its not ... but this IS the javascript channell
<7> lol
<8> hey.. is there a way to tell the popup window to be focus onload without using <body> tag? like <script>onload.this.focus() </script> ?
<7> inline script
<8> how? im kinda newbie
<7> <script> do stuff </script>
<8> <script>onload.this.focus() </script>
<8> i did this and its returns error
<7> no onload ... no onclick ... no function
<7> <script>this.focus();</script>
<7> as close to the top of the code as you can i guess
<8> no dont work
<8> hey.. is there a way to tell the popup window to be focus onload without using <body> tag? like <script>onload.this.focus() </script> ?
<9> window.onload = function() { this.focus() }
<8> just write : <script>window.onload = function() { this.focus() } </script>
<8> ?
<9> Yes...
<10> Hello
<9> Hello.
<10> Pilum, could you tell me please how to make a js function .. to alert me an text AAA when i click somewhere then if i click again to alert me BBB
<10> ?!
<10> i solved
<10> thanks anyway
<11> i write cookies from the code behind and when i read them from javascript on the client the the values become jibrish, do u know how to fix it?
<9> Elaborate.
<11> i write the cookies with c#, Response.Cookies.add
<11> and i read them from javascript on the client side
<9> Hardly qualifies as an elaboration I'm afraid.
<11> what do u want to know?
<9> Everything.
<12> the values of the cookies?
<11> strings
<11> in hebrew
<12> the values are broken?
<12> or you can't interpret the document.cookie value?
<9> Charset mismatch possibly.
<11> could be
<11> i wanted to know if u know of a problem with writing cookies from the code behind and reading them in js
<11> hold on, i try in english
<9> And when you have a problem it's easier to get help if you explain in detail exactly what you are doing rather than giving a short summary.
<11> but what i'm doing is very short
<11> put a cookie and try to read it
<9> Then it shouldn't take too long to explain in detail, should it?
<11> put it with code behind and read with javascript
<11> not many details is it?
<9> Not when you
<9> Not when you're being so vague, no.
<11> k hebrew prob
<11> bye
<13> SUKOTTO!!!! HELLO BROTHER!!!!!!
<13> ZUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUB!!!!
<13> HUI SOSKI!!!
<14> I think the problem is that: Hebrew is jibberish
<15> hey Pilum
<15> this code works, but I wanna be sure I'm doing it right
<15> http://pastebin.ca/86086
<16> alert("You are stupid! Use a real value!"); should be
<16> alert("Get a life ***hole! Use a real value!");
<15> lol
<15> I guess is that the proper way to do it
<15> or is there a better way
<17> Javascript supports regEx in the same way perl does? I thought you had to use a cl*** or something to work with regEx
<17> oh nevermind
<17> I can read
<15> ?
<17> String.search() supports Regular expressions?
<15> parently so
<15> it works
<15> the whole bit of codde works but I added the if (obj.value != '')
<15> I just want to make sure that's proper
<17> that's superflous because if its blank, the regex wont find anything anyways
<15> no it will
<17> I suppose it prevents unnecessary code execution, making it slightly more efficient
<15> if it's blank, and you remove focus the alert hits
<17> but you know what, if it works then leave it alone, it doens't have to be pretty.
<15> yeah, but theres a difference in learning something wrong, and learning something right
<17> Ive wasted so many hours trying to make something "better" only to have broke it two seconds later and had to fix it again
<17> The code is correct, if it wasn't it wouldn't work.
<15> for example, if($blah == '') in php should be if(empty($blah))
<15> looks better
<15> is more correct
<17> but that is less efficient
<15> or at least in my mind is more correct
<15> or you can use isset
<17> Everyone has their own coding style, you dont have to do it like someone else just because they like it better. I do things my way because I dont like most other people's coding style.
<15> yeah, but sometimes there's better ways of doing things
<17> Thats why I like programming, you can do the same thing a million different ways
<17> sometimes when Im bored Ill concatinate a string when I could just print it as a single string
<3> only if you are the only person reading your code. or you try to protect your job by writing it in crazy style
<9> != empty() isn't equal to != '' though.
<17> I know
<15> well yeah
Return to
#javascript
or
Go to some related
logs:
#AllNiteCafe
#chatzone
jixebilku
There is nothing more that I want Than to touch you To seek through In your eyes
has_9
nhobbok
Falchion Invid
undefined function: imagecreatetruecolor() apt-get install
#windows
sex with.animLS
|
|