| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4
Comments:
<0> you mean #java owner?
<1> yes
<0> Clackwell will be the new manager if he gets enough support
<1> I said I'll be one of the supporters if you are not enough, anyway, he should apply this year, instead of waiting for some miracle
<1> the more waiting, the worse
<0> yeah
<0> just start the application
<1> it's a matter of time until a lamer will try to do lame things, so... I really dunno what's he's waiting for
<2> as far as i know, he wanted to start the registration today, but got an error regarding Rob_uknow using an invalid email address
<1> then he should replace Rob_uknow as a supporter
<1> from my point of view this channel should have had X again by now
<3> Dude, what's the rush?
<1> the example is far from any of my intentions, but a lamer could do it
<3> Got to go collect my food, bbl.
<4> SAnDAnGE: If a lamer does lame things there is always our friendly neighborhood IRC oper willing to help.
<4> patience is a virtue. Better not rush into things.
<1> my example had nothing to do with opers
<4> mine does :P
<1> that was my example
<4> then you're not opped.
<1> so ?
<4> you figure it out :P
<1> you don't know the supporters, you know only the applicant
<1> so... think about it
<5> Lion-O: What does beeing op have to do with anytihng? ;)
<4> wlfshmn: more than some people are willing to realize. I too have lots of critcism towards undernut and cservice but I'd give 'm more slack than that.
<1> Lion-O so.. is it possible what I said ? :)
<4> SAnDAnGE: Very unlikely.
<4> And at this moment I'd even deem it impossible.
<1> think more about it, X counts only joins ;)
<4> SAnDAnGE: wrong. Anyway, this discussion is a moot and uninteresting one.
<1> that was my point to that Clackwell should hurry a bit
<6> hey
<0> hey
<6> help please..
<6> The user enters a String into a JTextField and I want to iterate through an ArrayList of objects until that String matches with a field of the object..
<0> I can kick you, does that help?
<2> web james_mil
<0> ow, there is the question
<2> wb
<6> thanks MbGone :)
<6> Is this the correct way of doing this:
<6> Iterator it = arrayList.iterator();
<6> while (it.hasNext()) { Product pro = (Product)it.next(); if(pro.getName().equals(textField[i].getText().trim())) {.....}
<6> for some reason the IF statements returns true even if they don't match
<6> the i is declared in a for loop before the while loop, as there is an array of textfields so it checks with each text fields
<6> what am I doing wrong?
<6> thanks in advance..
<0> you should work event based
<0> the user types text and presses 'ENTER'
<0> then you receive an actionPerformed event
<0> there you check the entered string against the items in the list
<0> if a match is found do something
<6> Yea ..thats what ive done...when the actionPerformed is called, a call to a method is made, and then the above code is performed
<6> Rob_uknow: But thats what I'm doing in my code above arn't I?
<0> if(mylist.indexOf(textfield.getText()) != -1) { .. }
<0> thats all
<0> if getText is in the mylist it will return the index of that item
<0> if its not in the list it will return -1
<6> hmmm
<6> But the arraylist stores OBJECTS
<0> String is also an object
<0> what types are in the list?
<0> you could override the equals mathod of Product
<6> they are objects of Product
<0> anyways
<6> hmmmmm
<6> So why doesn't my code above work? or does it all seem ok?
<0> looks fine
<6> hmmmm
<0> I take it you break out of the while loop if you find a match?
<0> using break;
<0> or return the method
<2> james_mil - can you paste the entire code in pastebin or in javafaq.mine.nu ?
<2> grr i mean, the entire for loops
<6> nope Im not using break ?
<6> do i need to use it?
<0> well, its a shame to iterate over the other items if you already have a match
<6> how do i structure that?
<6> MbGone hold on
<6> MbGone: http://www.pastebin.ca/330344
<6> pro.getName() returns a String
<0> why don't you just print pro.getName and textfield.getText to system.out
<0> and see for yourself why they don't match
<4> hmm. I could be mistaken but a for loop can also itterate immediatly through an ArrayList iirc.
<6> no, the problem is that it always says it DOES match, even when it doesnt
<6> but ill print it out now
<4> IMO its a little odd to keep defining it over and over again in that loop.
<6> hmmmm
<6> ok thanks for that..i think ive got it working..ill be back later..need shower.. laters
<7> dishes to wash :'(
<7> bbiab
<0> I have a dishwasher for that
<2> wife ? :P
<0> wife would be cheaper
<0> or..
<0> would it
<2> no it wouldnt
<0> dishwasher is more efficient then doing it by hand
<0> since you save up the dishes
<2> but you need to buy the dishwasher
<2> wow, we are really bored :)
<0> its only a one time investment
<0> yeah
<0> java rulez
<2> hehe
<0> dishwasher.washdishes();
<2> you mean.. :
<2> if(logger.isDebugEnabed())
<2> logger.debug("Washing dishes..");
<2> dishwasher.wash();
<0> no way
<2> there
<0> I only log errors
<2> really?
<0> ofcourse
<2> really helps in production systems
<0> we already have 1 gigabyte logfiles every month
<2> thats why its debug log... the production system is in info level
<2> and if we want to open logs we change it to debug
<0> debug level is not configured on production
<2> what do you mean configured? its simply a log4j.xml file, which can be changed online
<0> yeah
<0> so on production log4j.properties doesn't list debug
<2> we have to log4j files , one for debug and one for productin, when we want to open logs we simple copy the debug one over the log4j.xml , and when we want to close them we copy the production one
<2> s/to/two
<0> we just configure them
<8> ah he's back again
<8> hm rubbish ban messages in this client, must resort back to default.
Return to
#java
or
Go to some related
logs:
domapi save listgrid
C++ Iwebbrowser2 sink
#AllNiteCafe
kadotary
#c++
miqmaq spelling
#mysql
#linux
#linux
#windows
|
|