| |
| |
| |
|
Comments:
<0> can I do that?
<1> hi everyone
<1> is everyone at work?
<2> no we're at the beach
<2> where the hell are you?
<1> in the sun
<1> kinda hard to see the screen
<2> not with my solar powered laptop and plasma screen
<1> see there is my mistake
<1> how are you sabre
<2> peachy
<1> do you know anything about struts?
<3> sabre, are you serious?
<2> yeah man
<2> :)
<3> prtyanml , the only thing about struts is when I finally figured it out, I told myself to go GWT.
<3> Sabre, how much for the solar power?
<1> what's gwt?
<2> dude i'm bull****ting about the laptop lol
<3> Google Web Toolkit.
<3> it's javascript + html into pure java code.
<1> cool I'll have to check it out
<3> from pure java i should say. :)
<1> thanks johnny
<3> yw
<1> I remember reading about it
<2> uhm
<2> seriously dude
<2> that is not on the same level as struts
<2> lol
<3> struts is overkill.
<2> not for enterprise system
<3> same as many other frameworks
<2> which is what it's made for
<4> Yeah, guys, let's not have a framework flamewar
<3> no seriously it's overcomplicated and you have to know at last 5 programming languages and APIs.
<2> why don't you just compare it to php
<2> get real
<1> sorry I asked :-p
<4> There are many frameworks because there are many problem domains. Just use the one that suits yours and leave other people alone.
<2> :)))
<3> casesar was a 'salad dressiing dude'.
<5> Hi all
<6> is there a command to list directories to a site with java or do i have to use unix's ls.. command ?
<6> so ?
<2> what are you tring to do?
<2> look for all java directories on linux?
<2> or unix
<2> aix wtfever..same ****
<2> so ?
<6> just triying to see all dir's in a site
<2> what "site"?
<2> your warez site?
<6> a php site
<2> i guess you were smoking crack when you typed /join #java and not /join #php or /join #warez
<6> probably
<2> sure some of your l337 buddies on #XxXCrackerS should know this...i mean ****
<6> an answer like "i dont know" or rtfm would be more appresiated than the one u gave me
<7> it would help to be given some more usefull questions. You know, the ones which could actually be answered.
<6> well im just asking if there is a java command that lets u see a website directory
<2> yeah man but it's top secret
<2> we'd have to tell you but then ban you
<2> and we don't want to ban you
<6> rofl
<6> kk anyway forget it thnx 4 your precious time
<2> well i guess we can give it away JUST for you....http://sun.java.com
<6> thnx
<2> java.sun.com
<6> lol
<7> it would also help to know what a "website directory" is.
<7> I mean, I can do that with plain html, don't need java for that. And when we're looking at Java; are we talking applets or servlets or....
<6> 1) the q is if it can be done with jave 2) server
<6> a*
<7> and that becomes plainly unreadable.
<2> Lion-O it's because he himself does not understand what he is asking
<7> sabre: very likely.
<6> ok jut forget it
<8> anyone knows any good hibernate tutorials?
<9> Hi , smsie , you maybe still around ?
<9> ..guess not... anyne else who can tell me some words about interfaces ?
<10> interfaces?
<9> Yep, Rob_uknow .
<10> its a way to tell others that your cl*** implements at least the methods defined in the interface
<9> Yes, that i was able to make out...
<9> But i want lets say to have a cl*** A and B which talk to each other using that interface...
<10> both cl***es implement the same interface?
<9> Yeah...
<10> and?
<9> Hum, wait... If both cl***es implement same interface, then the methods should be implemented in both cl***es... so how i tell cl*** A to use B.method1() using that interface ?
<10> A needs a reference to B
<10> it can call method1 if thats defined in the interface
<10> which A and B implement
<9> But not without creating an instance of the respective cl***, right ?
<10> there needs to be an instance of B
<9> See, and then, i dont see the deal with interfaces , because i can access B`s public methods as soon as i create an instance of B ...
<9> Without implementing any interface.
<10> no, but cl*** A might now be familiar with cl*** B
<10> it only knows the interface
<10> lets say you have 10 different implementations of that interface
<9> Ok.
<10> if you need to use the concrete cl***, then you would need to have 10 methods to handle them
<10> doSomethingWithCl***B(B b)
<10> doSomethingWithCl***C(C c)
<10> etc
<9> So far so good...
<10> you could introduce doSomethingWithObject(Object o)
<10> and p*** B, C etc
<10> but then what?
<10> you need to cast all those objects to the right type in the doSomethingWithObject method
<9> If i understood you correct, using our example above with cl*** A and B , so if both implement same interface, means A can access methods of instances of cl*** B , even if it wasn`t A the one who generated those instances, right ?
<10> it doesn't matter who generated the instances
<9> as long as both implement same interface, right ?
<10> no
<10> cl*** A just needs a reference
<10> it can either create an instance of an instance is p***ed to A
<10> p***ed to the constructor of A or some method
<9> Rob_uknow , something i misunderstood, seems it doesnt matter where the cl*** is initialised.... http://pastebin.com/719285
<11> salam
Return to
#java
or
Go to some related
logs:
#windows
#AllNiteCafe
#AllNiteCafe
my_michelle.mp3
-bash: wlanconfig: command not found
xbajt
c4wkg0blin
#AllNiteCafe
#AllNiteCafe
dkpg centOs
|
|