| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3
Comments:
<0> and more IT jobs
<1> it is a bit one sided to lump all open source projects into the "open and full of alternatives to switch to all the time" and all closed source projects into the "closed and hardly ever any alternatives to switch to" categories, in my opinion.
<0> well maybe i'm just thinking of the enterprise tools i use as a java developer
<2> anyone with a background in writing IDL interfaces?
<0> windows, wsad, starteam, etc
<1> i don't even see the point to insist so much on open source. if you make crap decisions for closed source solutions while "better" closed source solutions are available, chances are your open source focussed decisions will be just as ****ed up.
<0> i think i could be just as productive using linux, netbeans, and svn
<0> well i know i could
<0> and save the company loads of money
<1> i think you could, too. i would never doubt that.
<1> i am not so sure about the loads of money.
<1> it is too simplistic to generalise on technical points alone, and on your level of experience and your attitute.
<1> attitude
<0> well that's about $1500 worth of products just for me
<1> if your co-workers force you into an uphill battle because they are not as fluent with the stuff as you, or don't share your attitude, that seems like a good way to actually cause loss of money.
<1> it is pretty damn shortsighted to only consider license costs.
<1> license costs only make up a relatively small percentage of project costs, esp. in the enterprise market, last i heard.
<1> perhaps jottinger can shed a light on this.
<3> hi
<1> being the enterprise guru and all...
<1> hi
<2> can i get help on CORBA?
<1> cedre: no clue about it, except for the usual ("bloated freak stuff that nobody can help you with anyway").
<3> clackwell are u worlin into a erp?
<1> crestinul: no clue what you mean. u? worlin? "into a erp"?
<4> away
<1> sabre: productivity is a good factor to consider. you can find productivity boosting solutions on both sides of the fence, sometimes without competition on the other side of the fence. that is what i would not insist on either, but rather make the best pick based on requirements, hard factors, soft factors, etc.
<3> may i get some help here plsz
<1> crestinul: perhaps start by reading communicating with the people here. i for example just said something to you.
<1> crestinul: excellent communications, dude...
<1> you think if i stick it in his ear he'll start talking to me?
<3> i've got the next issue
<3> i've got two cl***es into a file
<3> the main cl*** and a thread cl***
<3> i want to acces from the thread cl*** a property public or protected from the main cl***
<3> this is posible only if i declare static that prop
<3> ?
<5> No.
<5> See how things are p***ed from one to the other in LessSimpleActionListener here: http://cime.net/~ricky/netsim/pi/actions.html
<5> That can also be done via constructor parameters or method calls.
<3> ty
<3> i've did this voa constructor
<3> but
<3> doesn't work for me
<3> i've p***esd a vector as parameter to thread constructor
<3> vector belong to main cl***
<3> and in thread i've add elements in vector
<3> but the vector apears empty in main
<5> Then you've done it badly.
<5> Try it the way that tutorial does it.
<3> i've p***ed the vectpor as [arameter in thread's constructor
<3> i can;t figure out when i was wrong
<5> And what did you do with it?
<3> well
<3> that vector
<3> has to be populated with Sockets objects
<5> Why are we talking about vectors?
<3> yes
<5> This is 2006, not 1997.
<3> i see
<3> listasocketuri.add(serversocket.accept());
<3> in threads's constructor seems to be ok
<3> but outside
<3> i mean in main cl***
<5> I'm not going to even try to piece together your program based on descriptions. Post something somewhere.
<3> i see ty
<1> crestinul: What is a test case? Why would you write one? See http://javafaq.mine.nu/lookup?22 (to show what you are *really* doing) Paste test case and any error messages to http://papernapkin.org/pastebin or another pastebin
<3> ty
<1> try to use complete words and sentences. that way you will appear less childish, less idiotic and like you actually care, which may raise people's motivation to help you.
<3> thank u clack u are so kind and politly
<1> crestinul: since you do not seem to agree on "u" and the rest of this kind of slang, you have no right to feel offended. :-)
<4> oh well
<5> Where were you, St_Jimmy?
<4> here there and everywhere
<1> bye
<4> away
<6> anyone used spring 2.0 annotational transactions?
<3> hi
<7> hi
<6> caverdude: greetings
<7> whats up today wlfshmn
<8> hello
<8> Is there a way to define a cl*** in more than one file, like in c++?
<9> stick it different namespace, sure
<3> re
<9> "package" in Java terminology
<3> my i ask u something please
<9> ask away
<9> whether we'll answer or not is another matter
<3> oh i see
<3> well i'l shout my issue though
<3> i've an java app which is an server socket app and tcp clients which are java aplets
<3> the issue is
<8> ok so can I let's say, define MyCl*** { public void f(){} } in MyCl***.java and add other functions in another file?
<3> in init eventin applet i'm connecting to server
<8> like another Mycl***.java
<3> and from java app i'm able only to write once on a socket after the socket is disconnected and i can't figure out why
<9> Lorraine - Ah, no. Partial cl***es. Certainly not up to 1.4, maybe in 1.5 (I've not looked at it in detail)
<8> Ahh, too bad then
<8> thanks
<8> Im stuck with 1.4
<0> why would you want to do that?
<8> My files get too big
<8> and messy
<0> then you probably aren't using OO effciently
<9> crestinul - I don't understand the prolbem
<9> only able to write once on a socket after it's disconnected?
<8> sabre nah
<3> yes
<9> that statement doesn't make any sense
<3> i'm writing from server
<9> why would you write to a disconnected socket?
<3> i donlt kniw how this could happend
<3> i think from applet may be
<3> auto
<3> in applet i'm connected toi server in init event
<3> that's all
<3> and i'm closing socket in destroy event
<10> hello
<10> anyone using netbeans?
<0> more than likely
<11> would like to compile a java file without having to put it in a project. but i dont know how this can be done in netbeans. apparently, it cannot be
<11> sorry
<11> i am HakunaMAtata
<12> i use jcreator :P
<11> is it an opensource program?
<12> umm
<12> sec
<11> it isn't free
<12> its not opensource
<12> i just learned to program in it from school :P
<12> http://www.jcreator.com/ <--freeware though
<11> but can you compile files with it instead of projects?
<0> giovannia` netbeans is an enterprise cl*** IDE...i'd suggest not using it for simple programs
<0> especially if you are new to java
<11> so what would you recomment sabre
<11> i am not liking nebeans. it is too slow
<0> notepad
<0> or textpad
<11> yes
<11> how can i know whether there are java and javac commands on my shell?
<11> javadoc
<0> java -version
<11> ok thanks
<11> one more thing
<11> where can i edit the CL***PATH?
Return to
#java
or
Go to some related
logs:
window.location.lastindexof
#php
#chatzone
anti-debug inurl:asm
#c++
CONTENTAL MICROWAVE
#linuxhelp
#java
#linux
what is the song that goes to the strongbow advert
|
|