| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5
Comments:
<0> What a nice man.
<1> yea thats why its so hard to defend a computer when the advisary has physical access to it.
<2> Hi?
<2> hello?
<0> Uh oh, it's Riddle_box. precious.
<2> Heya all.
<2> Any recommendations for a usb wifi dongle that'll be linux compatable?
<2> Eh...no?
<0> Uh oh, it's antigod.
<3> uh oh is right
<3> i don't understand why my firefox input textboxes are so huge
<4> Size isn't everything you know
<5> Dirkson: Netgear MA111 works.
<0> Hay Gurkan.
<0> There's nothing ***ier than a folder
<6> Gurkan, !
<7> anyone know of a good content management/portal ?
<0> wilkommen N`|ost|
<8> Whoot
<8> james is resigning
<8> Job vacancy in QLD: network/linux administrator
<8> Basicly, a mini me
<8> any takers? (c:
<0> hi there kernel26
<6> can i do it from nsw ?
<0> death comes to those who wait
<8> fraid not
<0> Psych: fraid not... Psych: frot.
<5> Hmmmz.
<5> Am I a fool?
<5> Insane?
<5> Installing gcc 4.
<0> blblblblblbl
<3> anyone else have problems with /dev/dsp?
<0> I am not at liberty to discuss that.
<3> i see
<0> it's true^*$**!@$@@%#%##~
<0> Ark4ng31 ._.
<9> hi
<10> i'm having problems with .tar's specified in ebuilds not being on any of the ftp's.
<9> what package?
<10> i few of them the last couple of day
<10> *days
<9> I had a similar problem 5 minutes ago, had to manually track one down
<10> friggen annoying
<9> klibc-1.2.1
<9> yeah
<9> easy enough, just to track a tar down and put it in distfiles and all should be well
<10> heh :)
<10> i think i'm using out of date packages..
<9> *should* :) makes me feel like im using slackware
<10> well.. some are out of date, others are too new maybe
<9> what are you trying to emerge
<10> at the moment, man2html
<0> Hay packet[z] whats goin on.
<10> but its looking for man-1.5, instead of man-1.6
<9> 1.5l-r2 here
<9> not even an ebuild for 1.6 in my tree
<10> the ebuilds for man2html are a year old.
<10> damn it.
<9> mmm great
<0> ^_^
<10> hrmm... not sure which mailing list or buzgilla to report that on
<9> http://www.oac.uci.edu/indiv/ehood/tar/man2html3.0.1.tar.gz <-lol
<10> haha
<11> ... analysis: moron! poit!
<10> oh yay.. Gurkan is back
<9> I hate doing it, but I compile and install it by hand if its that out of date... probably going to fubar something if I do that too much
<9> :/ :\
<10> hehe
<10> i hate having to check for updates manually :P
<10> i emerge simple **** like wordpress :P
<9> haha!
<0> More power... give me MORE POWER%@*!@%^^!!~$~
<9> lol
<0> Packet[z] you're looking especially shagworthy today.
<9> anyone using Eterm & flux?
<0> Just what I've always wanted ^_^
<0> That depends. Who's asking?
<10> na, not me
<10> me and a mate played woth XGL over the weekend
<5> Mank0r: Nice, isn't it?
<10> couldnt get much of it going
<5> Really?
<10> but its cool
<10> and even on a basic ****ty 6600, it ran sweet
<10> wobbly's are cool :P
<5> Yeah, love that.
<10> we did it on Ubuntu though
<5> It ****s pixel shaders up real good, though.
<10> mmkay :)
<10> even the lastest Gnome looks great
<5> I'd use it if I didn't use or write other OGL apps.
<10> i might actually dump KDE and move to Gnome very soon
<5> You should.
<5> I mean, I can barely stand gnome, but anything is better than KDE :D
<5> It's pretty, but not for me.
<5> Gnome, that is =)
<10> hehe
<10> Gnome was ugly, clunky, reminded me of MacOS9 and just blah.
<10> and KDE was ..WIN
<10> but now KDE is getting tacky
<5> Yes.
<10> and Gnome is getting sharp and ***y
<5> Not to mention that Qt isn't free.
<10> ...NIGGAWHAT?
<5> Oh, you didn't know that?
<10> newp
<5> Qt isn't free for commercial developers to use.
<10> ooOoo
<10> okays :)\
<5> I mean, in practice, that doesn't mean much, but in principle... =>
<10> yer
<10> for a home user, its sweet
<10> except that MS cant port Office to Qt for free
<10> (sif they would anyway :P )
<9> lol imagine that
<9> microsoft needs to recompile your kernel, press ok to continue
<10> or cancel to do it after restart
<9> the horror
<5> I don't like the look of Qt anyway.
<5> I just think it looks ugly.
<9> I havent used qt in years, I couldn't even tell you what it looks like now
<10> well you need to bang on Plastik etc straight way
<10> *away
<9> i've never used gnome/kde desktop, but I realized earlier on Id have to join one of the gtk/kde "clubs"
<9> there is just some stuff that isn't out there for gtk though
<5> Mank0r: Yeah, everyone says that.
<5> I think it's still ugly even after doing that.
<10> heh
<10> the lastest GTK clearlooks looks pretty similar to KDE plastik/lipstik
<9> thats what Im using now, looks great
<10> yer
<9> lata
<0> nooo! come back! :(
<12> Psych: homo
<0> s0ulslack: yer master, beeeotch!
<1> is there a way ***ign a file to be owned by multiple groups? it'd be great if I could "chown someuser:{users,samba,apache,some_other_group} some_file" so that all those groups have permisions to that file?
<13> heh
<13> you can
<13> make all those groups part of a group
<13> wait
<1> danm
<13> i didn' tthink that through
<1> yea I was thinking that too.
<13> can you?
<13> try it out
<0> Try it out... try out.
<13> :)
Return to
#gentoo
or
Go to some related
logs:
#networking
#javascript
#mirc
pinoy chatzone
#linux
#MissKitten
Sebastian Coe's middle name
#AllNiteCafe
ship stability exel
#windows
|
|