| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5
Comments:
<0> if i had to listen to that for an hour i would be.
<1> not too tired to have a beer, just dont feel like walking there
<1> why?
<0> just wondered.
<2> plinko
<3> ZOMG!!!!!
<3> tyvek: !!
<4> \o/
<3> how are you?
<2> pink ker TON
<3> tontont otn
<2> pinkerton: set life="hell"; su -c 'reboot'
<3> hrm
<2> you ?
<3> hah
<3> :-/
<3> i'm doing pretty good
<4> Shh autom4ke, it's quiet time now.
<2> rsync -rv --progress porn backup:
<4> ieks, dataghost
<2> I got about 3 gigs of stuff to shove over a local network ( no unfortunatly its not porn ) anyone with opions on how the fastest way todo that is?
<4> yes.
<3> well
<3> you can do rysnc with compression :)
<2> pinkerton: rsync over nfs ? samba ? ssh ?
<2> rsync over rsync ?
<3> um
<3> you gotta get technical dont' ya!
<2> yes
<3> samba gives too much overhead
<3> ssh shouldn't be too much
<2> samba seems slow ... although not CPU intensive
<3> correct
<2> ssh is fast ... but CPU intensive
<2> nfs is inconvienent but dirt fast
<3> not on my osx box
<3> plus stupid uid bull****
<3> uid/gid
<3> hate that
<3> so what did you choose tyvek ?
<2> have not decided
<2> wonder if I can do rsync over netcat
<2> I realy don't want to setup rsync server .. or nfs server
<2> I have samba ... although its a slow hog
<3> srsly
<2> ssh just trips out my CPU
<2> cp -a is a slow f'ing hog
<2> rsync is definatly the ticket
<2> maybe I'll just tar and netcat it
<3> heh
<2> netcat and tar is it
<2> simple no fuss
<2> fast
<3> netcat?
<5> why not ssh?
<5> tar and ssh, or sftp
<3> ssh just trips out my CPU
<3> per tyvek
<3> :)
<5> disable the compression and it won't tax your cpu
<4> Resistance is futile, you will be 0wn3d
<4> bleh
<4> uh oh, it's Dwism
<6> i have a battery operated tree o/
<4> hi there Heppycat
<7> any of you mental-cases know about resume-partitions for laptops ?
<4> sometimes
<8> not yet
<8> I can't get this thing to go to sleep and wake up yet
<7> i wonder if the linux suspend2 supports works/is any good yet
<8> it goes to sleep ok...
<8> but when you wake it up it boots like normal
<7> mmm... interesting
<8> I've tried suspend2 and suspend
<8> but then... it's an acer laptop
<7> mmm.. this too :)
<7> dunno about suspend, but suspend 2 should be independant of the laptop/bios/machine....
<9> *** ****in
<10> i have a problem
<10> i changed cpu's
<9> i bet you do
<10> but it was only from a P3 katmai 500mhz to a P3 coppermine 600mhz
<7> oh no ! thats a big problem
<10> but now when the kernel is loading the machine locks up after saying "booting processor 1/1 eip 3000"
<10> and i wouldnt have the slightest clue why
<4> Kernel26 you're looking especially shagworthy today
<7> hmmm.... tested with a livecd or memtest or something that the new processor actually works/is set up right ?
<4> You want the truth? you can't handle the truth!
<10> ill try memtest
<10> memtest boots and runs fine
<10> it wouldnt be a problem that it is under clocked would it?
<9> clock speed shouldnt matter
<10> thats what i thought
<10> well the cpu is running fine as memtest is cranking away
<10> what should i do now
<10> i didnt think such a small cpu change would matter
<7> could be clock speed.... SOME processors screw up if you make them too fast/slow for wierd timing reasons....i'd try booting a livecd kernel and seeing if it boots
<4> You are SO fired.
<10> ok
<10> ill try that
<7> if that doesn't work its almost definately incompatible cpu/board or timing problem, which is basically the same thing :) also check if the fsb is higher (just thought of it then,) that the ram can take it
<7> tho i suppose memtest just proved that
<7> is that board happy with the bus speed the cpu is setting ?
<10> so i manually set everything now and its all configured properly and bam still same problem so im stuck now
<9> hurmmm
<9> recompile your kernel?
<7> what problem ?
<10> linux doesnt like my new cpu in this machine
<10> livecd dont go, off hdd dont go only thing that does go is memtest
<9> sure the proc is good?
<10> i dont know how to test it, it came from a working machine so
<7> why is the speed wrong ?
<10> its not now
<7> hmmm... thats wierd
<10> its a slot 1 P3 800/133/256
<7> and the board/ram are happy with 133 ?
<10> i had to manually set the bus speed to 133 but it all works
<10> well it all works like that
<7> hmm..... tried setting bios to defaults ? it usually does nothing but OCCASIONALLY fixes extremely obscure/wierd problems like this
<7> or tried with noacpi boot options ?
<10> ill try it
<10> no i havent
<7> i just noticed the point at which it stopped MIGHT be acpi-related
<7> it might not ACTUALLY be noacpi.. might be acpi=off or something.... google...
<10> haha
<10> i turned acpi off in bios and bam booted
<7> wow ! some days i just have to say "**** i'm good !"
<9> nice
<7> i suppose the acpi is wrongly reporting the mem-locations/processor details....
<10> yeh
<7> heh... "HOORAY ! I WAS USEFULL"
<7> tho if you don't need it your sorted
<7> hmm... anyone know how slow win2000 is on a p200mmx with a bit more than 256m ram ?
<10> ill be ok with out it for now
<10> quite slow
<9> it works theBear
<10> tho yeh it does run
<9> you sure a p200 has 256mb?
<10> shouldnt be too bad
<7> mmmm... i'm just re-doing the laptop with the new hd... working out partitions and stuff... i'm thinking for what i'll need (laptop for holidays and work,) win98 will run the few things that i need....
<10> seen as it has 256mb ram
<7> this one has 284 or something... laptop with 256m chip from a g3 laptop and internal....
<9> i ran win2k on a 468dx4 120mhz with 128mb ram
<9> 486 rather
<7> hmmm.... how was it ?
<9> kinda usable
<10> heh i went from dual 500mhz P3 katmais to a single 600mhz P3 coppermine n the coppermine is alot quicker
<7> wow..... does it compile xorg or mozilla faster tho ?
Return to
#gentoo
or
Go to some related
logs:
#linux
#linux
#asm
javascript document.update
winsconsin zipcode
#linux
#AllNiteCafe
#MissKitten
#chatzone
#php
|
|