| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3
Comments:
<0> sok i gottit
<0> dam im stupid
<0> NETWORK_PORT gets the number 3445 put into it every time the main thread starts!!!!!
<0> arghhhhhhhhhhhhh
<0> thx for you help
<0> much appreaciated, you guys are great:)
<0> g2g
<0> cya
<1> how can i get the last time a file was modified on win32
<2> GetFileTime
<1> im using MingW
<3> can you recommend me some good book except K&R to learn C ?
<3> C for dummies.. is it a good book?
<2> Nope
<3> lol
<3> you haven't read it so you don't know
<4> ashe can't read at all. that's why he hasn't read it yet. you shouldn't make fun of him
<3> well malfunc can you recommend me some good book ?
<5> "C For Dummies" is awful. "C How To Program" by Deitel and Deitel is pretty good.
<3> but it's way too long
<3> over 1000 pages
<3> does it covers everything about C ?
<3> and have you read, it Xirtam
<3> ?
<5> No, I recommend things I don't know anything about.
<5> If K&R is too hard for you, you're going to need a longer book.
<3> Book Info
<3> Carefully explains C and presents substantial introductions to C++ and Java. Helps students build applications in all three languages.Extensive self-review exercises follow each chapter. Previous edition: c1994. Softcover.
<3> it also covers C++ and Java?!?
<5> I'd get the 2nd edition, who needs that Java crap?
<3> oh so C 2nd edition
<5> The 2nd edition of CHTP doesn't cover Java.
<5> I think it still does a C++ intro. That should be ignored.
<3> no..... I also want to learn something about C++ as well
<5> Yes, it should be ignored, even if you want to learn C++.
<5> You don't want a C++ book from 1994.
<3> oh...
<3> should I learn C before C++ ?
<5> Do you plan on actively using C? If so, then it doesn't really matter what you do. If you just want to learn C++, don't bother with C.
<3> isn't good to learn C++ and then find the differences between C++ and C and in that way learn C ?
<3> it will give me some motivation to learn core C++ and then just find the little differences
<5> Some people might advocate that view, some might not.
<5> I think C++ is an awful language so I don't think learning it is a good thing. But it's all subjective.
<3> but if you learn C++ then you can easily learn C
<3> the concept is the same
<3> right?
<5> I don't know. They're very different languages.
<5> You might be able to learn C easily, you might not. It depends on you.
<6> If you learn C++ as many of the C++ advocates are using it these days, the language is not very similar to what we do in C
<3> but if you master C++ it is not difficult to master C because they are little or more SIMULAR
<3> right?
<5> Wrong.
<5> If you learn C++ properly, you're learning a language that is a lot different than C.
<5> It might be easier than learning, say, Smalltalk after doing C++, but that doesn't mean it will necessarily be simple.
<3> I only need C for file operations damN!
<6> try a few languages, see what suits you well
<3> no
<6> and be warned that if you ask in #C++ they are going to fill your mind with propaganda haha
<3> yes that's true
<3> LOL
<3> so it's better to ask a person who knows both langs
<5> ConiX: Learn C++ first. C is so similar that once you learn C++ you'll easily be able to master C.
<7> my opinion is to learn C before C++
<7> if you've never programmed before then i definitely think that C before C++ is the better method
<3> I programmed before in: VB.NET and C# !
<5> I just gave him the answer he's looking for. It's easier for everyone this way.
<3> ok my final solution: I will do all I want
<3> ok?
<3> :)
<5> Clearly, you were just looking for validation.
<3> yes
<3> all people who were "neutral" told me what I told you
<3> it seems that you people more like C than C++ and that's why you give this
<3> it's a matter of taste really
<5> It seems that way because that what you want it to seem like.
<6> Many of use use both. Though for what I am doing right now, C++ will not do
<8> howdy
<8> Xirtam: thanks for making that easy :)
<8> language bigots are boring
<8> on and on and o... well you get the picture
<9> smugl : ask on The main channel, not in my pvt chat, please
<9> <smugl> how can i compile linux program for my linksys router that have a mipsel processor
<8> one uses a cross compiler
<10> Seems he messaged everyone
<9> lol
<8> he didn't message me
<8> but if it's a problem, i'll kick him off
<8> magic kick
<11> Q: which switch or what to put inside system("switch"); function to get it tu run in fullscreen on windows???
<11> or where I can get full list of these switches?
<11> thank you
<12> anyone around?
<13> No. We're all dead.
<12> thats unfortnate
<12> m*** suicide?
<13> Here and dead, there and brain fried, does it really make a difference? :)
<12> probably not
<12> http://rafb.net/paste/results/MRiRnc80.html <--- why doesnt this work?
<13> Loading...
<14> c-bot malloc
<15> PiousBlue, here you go: malloc - #include <stdlib.h> void * malloc (size_t size) Basic Memory Allocation (ISO) see - http://www.msunix.co.uk/manual/glibc-2.2.3/html_chapter/libc_3.html#SEC25
<16> hi
<16> can some please look at http://rafb.net/paste/results/YUXQqx41.html line 141
<16> that malloc modifies email variable
<16> last char ...
<16> anyone online?
<17> yup, what?
<16> please read above..
<17> eXcelsior mai esti?
<16> da
<16> mallocul ala cred ca alocheaza variabila tmp peste var email
<16> imi rescrie ultimul caracter din email in finctie de "sizeof(char)"
<16> daca pun altceva acolo (gen 20 sau 30 sau 40) dif codulf asci al ultimului caracter din email
<17> ce`i asta: email=malloc(sizeof(char));
<17> adica ce`ai vrut sa zici cu asta
<16> poi daca nu aloc asa imi da eroare la fscanf
<16> zice ca nu e alocata variabila
<16> e o alocare "temporara" ... fscanf realoca bine
<17> nope, no no. fscanf nu aloca nimic
<16> si atunci cum imi afiseaza bine?
<16> liniile 139 si 140
<16> *138 si 140
<17> pai iti scrie in memorie. dar tu`ti bulesti heap`ul cu asta
<16> humm
<16> si atunci cum fac?
<17> ia incearca un free p`acolo, sa vezi cum tipa
<16> citesc caracter cu caracter emailul?
<16> si toate stringurile in egneral?
<17> pai in primul rand aloca un buffer rezonabil
<16> dar nu stiu cat de mare o sa fie..
<17> 10k ar fi destul ptr majoritatea mailurilor
<17> daca e mai mare dealoci ce`ai alocat si dublezi
<16> aha..
<16> am pus maximul.. 255
<16> mere..
<17> heh, ala nu e maximul mah
<16> mersi
<16> sunt stringuri mai mari de 255?
<17> da ce te crezi in pascal?
<18> ack! its not english!
<17> poti sa ai string de 4 gb daca vrei
<17> eXcelsior: hai pe privat.
<8> howdy
<19> hm
<19> anyone happen to know a cheap but reliable switch that is snmp enabled? :)
<8> no such thing
<8> and snmp ****s rocks
Return to
#c
or
Go to some related
logs:
#c++
#AllNiteCafe
ununium
#linux
bjeans
#php
#MissKitten
#php
#skype
dxb2game125
|
|