| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Comments:
<0> What?
<0> They didn't go anywhere.
<1> i mean,lets say i wants to add something to the list
<0> They're methods on the list.
<1> but i cant access the methods list :/
<1> only to the iterator
<0> So get a reference to the list.
<0> Since that's where the methods are.
<1> hmmm
<1> when i doing
<1> list. i get only list of stuff like "operator ->" etc
<1> not push_back() begin()
<0> You're talking about IntelliSense?
<1> nope
<2> huhu
<0> Then I have no idea what you're saying.
<1> sorry,i'm new to that stuff
<0> They're methods on the list *object*, not the list *cl****
<1> what i did is to define like
<1> list <MyCl***>::iterator xCl***;
<1> now when i doing
<1> xCl***->xxxx i can access the cl*** functions etc
<1> but i cant add more objects to the list
<0> Of course not.
<0> Because, as I said, those would be methods on the list object.
<0> list <MyCl***> foo;
<0> foo.push_back(bar);
<2> You can't eat the banana if all you have is an apple.
<1> but its will define me a new list
<0> list<MyCl***>::iterator i = foo.begin();
<0> dr3f, you need a book.
<1> oh
<1> yes i know i need a book or something
<0> "Accelerated C++" by Koenig & Moo
<0> Hie thee to a bookseller and procure it forthwith.
<3> or be lazy and order it on amazon
<1> i will try msdn instead
<1> as i dont have money for books
<3> (which is the only option i have)
<3> dr3f: but you do have time to waste? :)
<1> yes alot
<1> i have all time in the world
<3> i used to :/
<3> things change so quickly
<1> yep
<0> dr3f, MSDN is a reference. It won't teach you standard C++.
<0> Now, sell some lemonade or deliver some papers and get that book.
<1> any website ?
<0> No. They all ****.
<1> which can tech me cpp good ?
<2> calc koenig2
<4> koenig2 = "Accelerated C++: Practical Programming by Example", Andrew Koenig, Barbara Moo, Addison-Wesley, 2000. ISBN 0-201-70353-X.
<0> Well, there's one that ****s less than the others...
<0> http://cplus.about.com/od/beginnerctutorial/l/blcpptutorials.htm
<3> indeed, most website are crap
<0> That's the least ****y C++ website.
<3> there's also 'thinking in C++' by Bruce Eckel
<1> thanks
<3> a free e-book
<0> Eww, not Eckel.
<3> google will tell you where to find it
<2> calc thinkc++
<4> thinkc++ = Free Electronic Book for Download: Thinking in C++, Second Edition, Volume 1& 2 - http://www.mindview.net/Books/TICPP/ThinkingInCPP2e.html
<3> i never read it
<0> Go get the Koenig book.
<0> I have, mathieu_. The ****y web site is better.
<3> Solamente: ok :)
<1> which tutorial i shuld read in order to work good with the <list> ?
<0> *sigh*
<0> Get the book I was talking about, which explains the concepts behind *all* standard containers.
<0> Then you'll understand list by extension.
<0> But really, whatever tutorial you get, start at the beginning.
<1> i know some parts of cpp
<1> but not all of it
<5> Thanks for your help again, all sorted now, seeya
<6> can anyone help me with a regexp?
<6> very simple query.
<6> ^(\w+\b.*?){10}
<7> um
<7> so..
<6> gets the first 10 words from a sentance.
<6> sentence.
<6> if there ARE ten.
<7> you are doing that wrong.
<6> how so?
<7> it obviously doesn't work :P
<7> or you wouldn't be asking
<6> it works.
<6> but only where the input has ten or more words.
<7> yeah
<7> {10} that's why
<6> i need to output the original if that doesn't match.
<6> how do i do that?
<7> um
<6> i need a 10 at most type thing.
<7> if ~= /^(\w+\b.*?){10}/
<7> else
<7> show ****
<6> heh
<6> i know there's a way to mod that regexp to do just that, but i don't know how :S
<7> i mean
<7> ok
<6> any ideas?
<7> ask vawjr he know it all
<8> huh??
<7> you know everything about c++
<7> haha
<7> this man needs some help
<7> i don't do regex with c++
<8> nor I
<7> oh well
<7> i guess he's sol
<6> sol?
<9> Solamente, a term meaning ugly beyond belief
<9> that's not very nice, sb___
<6> heh
<7> **** out of luck
<7> and other things
<7> originally **** outta luck
<2> {1-10}
<7> i mean
<7> truth hurts?
<7> {1,10}
<0> sol == sheep on lap, one of peterhu's pastimes
<0> BTW, thanks for the info on VS 2003 project references. Saved us a bunch of heartache.
<0> #using to the rescue
<8> Solamente we inadvertnelty updated a .net DLL using vs2005, and the guy enhanced it and it now uses some 2.0 stuff
<8> do you know of any way we can use this dll w/ a main program that's written in .net2003 ?
<0> Hmm
<0> I don't think you can
<8> in pirinciple, I don't see why, if both frameworks are installed, it wouldn't "just work" but he can't make it a reference
<0> Emphasis on "think"
<8> right, gotcha
<0> The metadata says it's for 2.0
<0> So the loader barfs
<8> the interface doesn't describe any 2.0 stuff (that I know of)
<0> Yeah, but the ***embly is built for 2.0.
<0> There may be some stuff in the spellbook that I haven't gotten to that allows this, but normally I know of no way.
<8> ok, thanks
<10> the wonders of irc : http://jaysunisamoron.blogspot.com/
<8> some of these are hilarious: http://bash.org/?latest
<10> Sorry, the MySQL daemon appears to be down.1 <- what a surprise :)
<11> I have an handle to a window, how do i know where its positionned?
<12> GetWindowPos
<11> thanks
<10> GetWindowRect
<11> even better, thanks
<12> Well, considering the other one didn't exist heheh
<10> anyway MSDN has all that crap in it
<10> use that instead
<13> Off to office
Return to
#c++
or
Go to some related
logs:
#linux
#teens
#c++
#linuxhelp
tij4 torrent
heaving brea
#squid
#linux
listen to cascada
#teens
|
|