| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Comments:
<0> What absolute crap
<0> You're the one sounding insecure
<1> WhatAHam: I feel pretty selfsecure, cause only three days ago, when I told the one and only coder that I look up to that I looked up to him, he said that I was one of the two coders he knew that he'd consider to be better coders than himself :*)
<2> no, i just said i don't like egos because they make things harder
<2> Solamente, how is that insecure? you are inventing things..
<3> lol
<0> I'm not the least bit bothered by programmers with "egoes" because I'm completely aware of my abilities, and my shortcomings.
<2> Solamente, yes, but egos that get in the way of arriving at a solution that is correct simply because the ego programmer didn't think of it first is annoying..
<4> Run: he must **** then ;)
<0> WhatAHam: What your describing is not an ego. It's an act.
<4> (or got a crush on you)
<1> Ashe: No, he's ****ing good imho - which is why I realllly felt that as a wonderful compliment.
<2> for instance, the primadonna ego programmer will come up with some solution that is ok, my solution is better or whatnot but the ego programmer is being a baby and refuses to discuss it intelligently, etc
<1> Also not, he straight and married.
<2> anyway whatever.. i am just sick of programmers with the philosophy that teaching and helping others is a bad thing.. or that sharing and communicating is somehow wrong.. too much insecurity in the workplace.. bah
<1> WhatAHam: GOOD coders shouldn't teach newbies - that is a waste of their time.
<5> WhatAHam must not like the government's seceret code... it means governmetn programmers have egos and small penises... they're also gay
<2> like not commenting code because you are so awesome ... that type of thing just makes it harder for everyone else
<1> jsaacmk: What is your problem with fags and gays?
<6> j basarabi
<5> I have no problem
<2> Run, that is an unevolved stance.. imagine if you could teach the newbies then have them do all the easy tasks under your direction so that you can focus your energies on the really hard stuff.. rathre than being forced to do a little of both
<4> He probably has no problem with gays, since he doesn't like people with small penises
<1> lol
<5> that is true Ashe
<2> i dunno about you, but i would love to have 10 junior programmers underme under my direction doing all the easy crap so i can just go get coffee and come back and work ont he hard problems
<1> Well, I'm gay and like small penises, so I guess that reasoning doesn't hold Ashe :p
<7> There are persons though that they ask over the internet few questions from time to time
<4> Why would you like them small
<4> ?
<7> and they don't argue nor talk w/ anybody IRL
<7> self teached
<0> I'm self-taught. That meant, ipso facto, that I wasn't taught by a good programmer until recently.
<4> whitewabbit: problem with teachers newbies is that you eventually want to kill them
<7> I'm not a waste of time for a programmer cause i don't bug him/her.
<4> s/teachers/teaching
<7> Ashe heh
<0> On the other hand, my problem with college comp-sci professors is that they uniformly *aren't* good programmers.
<2> Solamente, actually i am self-taught too mostly... heh.. self-taught programmers tend to be better ;)
<7> Plus, i consider myself always a newb.
<5> http://www.finlandforthought.net/wp-content/tarja_halonen_conan_obrien.jpg the lady is going to be the next president of Finland
<4> But does she have a small penis?
<0> Conan O'Brien?
<5> yes, conan is going to be the president.
<1> I needed help the first year that I coded, helped a lot to have a good friend who knew everything at the time.
<4> Hey, there's a new poster at despair
<4> Perfect for each time JBlitzen wants to argue with you
<4> http://www.despair.com/compromise.html
<0> I have their best-of poster at the office now.
<0> (And I'm not even there anymore.)
<2> Solamente, yeah yuo're right.. but a really good comp sci school will have grad students that have some professional programming experience teahcing undergrads.. those are schools like Stanford, etc
<8> re
<1> Ie, I did things like char* s1 = "hello"; char* s2 = "hello"; if (s1 == s2) ... and didn't get why it didn't work in the first few weeks that I started coding in C, heheh.
<0> Heh... I like that one.
<2> actually that might work depending on the compiler and options specified
<1> WhatAHam: yeah ... it would :/
<0> WhatAHam: And your point is...?
<1> In gcc at least. But you get my way of thinking there, and that was wrong.
<4> You didn't even make it char const* :'(
<2> that it just makes it even more confusing to the beginner when it works sometimes and at other times not..
<0> (And no, it wouldn't *work*... you'd just get a correct answer by accident.)
<4> Run: vc++ also has an option to avoid duplicate strings
<1> Ashe: Worse, I probably wrote: char *s1 = "hello";
<2> ok not work, but it would lead to seemingly correct behavior at first thus further confusing the poor nebie
<2> newbie
<1> Well, I was too lazy to make one the above a dynamic string :p
<4> Who needs strings anyway
<1> Right now I wonder why my egrep did let F {void* std::memchr(void*, int, size_t)} {/usr/local/gcc-graph/lib/gcc/i686-redhat-linux/3.4.4/../../../../include/c++/3.4.4/cstring:101} get through.
<1> egrep '<unnamed@parser\.cgd>|CGDFile|Cl***|DirTree|Directory|Edge|FileName|Function|Location|LongName|Project|ShortName|Subdir|clean_exit|debug::InvisibleAllocations|debug::indent|find_header'
<1> There must be something that I don't understand about egrep :/
<5> shoot. I need to make my midi interpreter library able to accept arbitrary input streams. I foobarred up the first implementation. have to rewite most of it.
<9> ok.
<9> i'm about to stop idling here if it keeps bringing on the spammers.
<10> anyone on epic
<11> Is there anything wrong with this, like espesially in the "or" parts:
<11> if((yes_no = "No") || (yes_no = "NO") || (yes_no = "no") || (yes_no = "nO")){
<5> there are some horridly wrong things
<11> ahh....nevermIND!
<4> ==
<11> ==!
<4> Then you could tolower it then check == "no"
<12> or uppercase it :o)
<5> it's easier to read lowercase
<11> well no because i can not get transform(month.begin(), month.end(), month.begin(), tolower); to compile right in g++, it only will in VS2k5
<11> i was doing that in a differennt program the other day
<5> did you #include <algorithm> ?
<11> yes
<11> and cctype
<4> What error do you get?
<11> vs2k5.cpp: In function `int main()':
<11> vs2k5.cpp:36: error: no matching function for call to `transform(__gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<char*, std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > >, __gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<char*, std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > >, __gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator<char*, std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > >, <unknown type>)'
<11> that error
<4> Well, unknown type looks like a problem :p
<11> here is my source: http://www.noidea128.org/sourcefiles/15896.html
<4> What if you do std::tolower?
<13> #include ctype.h and use std::tolower
<4> It's not ctype.h
<11> its <cctype> right?
<4> Yup
<4> Though I seem to remember there are two versions of tolower
<4> Anyway it still shouldn't say its type is unknown
<11> i still get the same error with std::tolower
<4> What if you just do char c= std::tolower('H');?
<4> And did you include cctype in the end?
<4> Cause it's not in what you pasted
<4> + you don't have a main
<11> what do you mean i dont have a main?
<4> It's called _tmain
<4> In your error it talks about main()
<11> oh eyah...i pasted wrong one...here is the right one for g++ http://www.noidea128.org/sourcefiles/15897.html
<11> I am making them in VS2k5, but my instructor says they have to work correctly with g++
<13> Ashe, can i ask you a question in private ?
<13> I don't want meself humiliated in pubnlic :P
<13> public*
<4> Why not, I might paste it in here though
<13> Okay, i never ported anything on windows.
<13> my question is, what do i have to do in my source to be an .exe under windows.
<14> compile it?
<13> I need a compiler in windows and compile the source ?
<4> Yeah
<13> i don't have to make any modifications in my source ?
<4> mingw is gcc for windows
<4> Depends what's in your source
<13> mingw is free ?
<4> Even VC++ is free
<13> That's my point, depends on what ?
<4> Well, if you call linux functions ever 5 lines
<4> It won't work
<13> give me an example of depends on what's in my source
<4> If it's just standard C++, it'll work
<13> Okay,
<13> The Standard c++ is what ?
<4> Like, you use ifstream, no problem
<13> ansi c ?
<4> You use open => you'll need CreateFile (or _open if it's VC++)
<13> such things are confusing me
<4> Ehm ANSI C is.. C
<4> But basically standard C++ is all the headers without .h ;)
<13> Yes, ANSI C is like we say standard C ?
<4> And the stuff in std::
<15> generally speaking, you need all those libs you use on windows
<13> Okay,
<13> thanks for the info and for not laughing at me.
<16> are careva un program c++ care testeaza daca G' este subgraf al grafului G???????
<16> are careva un program c++ care testeaza daca G' este subgraf al grafului G??????
<16> are careva un program c++ care testeaza daca G' este subgraf al grafului G?????
<5> only if Mihaela_15 wasn't annoying
<13> Mihaela_15 try English
<16> oke... english
Return to
#c++
or
Go to some related
logs:
#linuxhelp
#AllNiteCafe
#java
#gentoo
#AllNiteCafe
#linux
#MissKitten
#php
abazaym
lose 4kg in 4 weeks
|
|
