| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Comments:
<0> (before the network, they were bitching about memory usage)
<0> Like "how come when your application starts it takes more memory"
<0> :'(
<1> something like this story : http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/01/27/bofh_2006_episdoe_4/
<1> stupid app that takes memory
<0> Funny thing
<0> Management wanted to give them an explanation (for the memory)
<0> So I wrote 3 pages of how memory is managed (heaps, pages, etc)
<0> (I like being annoying)
<0> So later they said "ok, we'll run a backup, from what you said, it'll take more memory while the backup runs right?"
<0> So I said "probably yeah"
<0> And when the backup started, Oracle flushed to the archive logs
<0> So memory usage went down 20% :'(
<2> Intel Xeon 3.6GHz 800MHz 1MB L2Cache Upgrade kit
<2> that's the CPU right?
<3> yes
<0> No, it's the harddis
<0> +k
<3> Ashe heh
<0> And if it's called upgrade kit, it's probably more than a CPU
<3> sk8ing no
<2> That Upgrade Kit made me think at other things
<2> oh, cool
<3> it probably the xeon arch. mainboards support for cache upgrade
<0> Mine doesn't
<0> And the cache is on the CPU
<3> Ashe even a sunfire v60x is not enough for you :)
<2> I want to buy this one
<0> I don't like SPARC's
<3> why is that
<0> And I have a v880 now at work :D
<0> sk8ing: if you want to buy only one, it's a waste of money
<2> why?
<3> heh
<0> Because it's about as fast as a normal P4
<0> Except for half the price you get a dual core one
<0> Actually, maybe 1/4 the price
<0> It's a Xeon DP or MP?
<2> let me see
<2> it doesn't say
<0> Btw it's not the same socket as P4s, so you need another motherboard
<2> I know
<0> So why do you want a Xeon?
<2> for the speed
<3> sk8ing why you need a xeon in deed
<2> L2 cache
<0> It's not faster than a P4
<0> And P4s have a 2 MB cache now
<0> And 2 cores
<2> hmmm is it cheaper?
<0> It's half the price
<2> so you would recomand a p4 instead of a xeon?
<0> Or an Athlon x2
<0> Certainly not a Xeon
<0> Unless you buy 2 or 4
<4> ashe (:
<0> But then you won't run anything that needs that many CPUs
<2> true
<0> Xeon DP 3.6 GHz =>
<0> Oops
<0> Xeon DP 3.6 GHz => ~700
<2> let me post the specs
<0> Athlon x2 3800+ => ~300
<0> I know the specs, I don't care
<3> i am off, nite.
<0> Pentium D 2.8 GHz => ~230
<5> good night meyrn
<0> Or even Pentium D 3.2 GHz => ~450
<0> Still way more powerful than the Xeon
<5> whats the number on the end Ashe?
<0> The price
<5> cost?
<5> ok
<3> oyasuminasai
<2> http://www.noidea128.org/sourcefiles/15891.html
<6> opteron 165 (dual core, 2 MB cache) => ~350
<0> Useful, can just get an X2
<2> ok, let me check the prices
<0> sk8ing: congratulations, you just posted the most worthless information that website ever had
<0> (and don't forget that the xeon motherboard will be twice the price too)
<2> hmm... so x2 should be the right choice?
<0> (but have half the features)
<0> Yeah
<0> Athlon 64 x2, 2 GB of RAM, and you should be fine for a while
<0> Talking about that, I should get a new PC
<7> hello can anybody help me please?
<0> Nope
<7> not you Ashe, I know what you're going to say :D
<5> ahaha
<7> even though you've already said it I'm still perplexed
<0> That was difficult to answer
<2> I'll have to stick to what I have for at least a month
<0> Why
<2> I can't afford everything
<8> It's okay.
<2> I'll need cpu, motherboard, ram
<8> I have everything; it's overrated.
<0> Yeah, having everything ****s
<0> Cause then you don't know what to get
<2> I'm sure it's better than 1.2 duron :)
<8> PLus it's really difficult to find a place to keep it all.
<0> If you have everything, you have that place too
<9> if you have everything, then you have herpes, and take ScribbleJ's word for it, you don't want it
<8> Sure, Ashe, I'll buy that... but where do I keep that place, see? You can't win.
<2> INTEL Pentium D820 Dual-core
<2> does this worth it?
<9> guh, a weekend without football, only two more games before the year starts to officially ****
<9> until august
<0> Annoying spam
<0> There, no more spam
<0> DUH
<3> +b qiqa115
<9> qiqa? what kind of female name is that?
<3> advert. crap
<0> <qiqat15> heya,hardcore xxx porno for free ! visit ==>>> http://192.168.1.3/Extream-Hardcore-XXX.pif
<0> What kind of stupid IP is that anyway
<9> AWESOMA POWAHRU
<3> peterrrr
<3> sugar daddy :)
<9> word?
<0> And then they married and got many children
<10> heh, I set my router up to be 192.168.3.1
<0> Mine's 192.168.1.254
<0> Well, and there's ont at 192.168.2.254 too
<0> Which is also at 192.168.1.252, technically
<0> 192.168.1.253 is the wifi access point
<0> Then 192.168.2.25x is servers
<10> those are real servers though
<0> And 192.168.2.20x is dev consoles
<9> 192.168.2.1 is the gay porn file share
<0> Exactly, it's my computer
<11> whois/ Mercedx64
<9> heh, i didn't know that the seahawks quarterback has been struck my lightning twice
<12> hello , i have a problem with b-spline curves, for end conditions. the formula say i need to duplicate the first point and last
<13> I have a compile (linker) error under gcc on linux: graphpaintarea.o(.text+0xa1): In function `GraphPaintArea::GraphPaintArea[not-in-charge](Graph*)' : undefined reference to `vtable for GraphPaintArea
<13> anyone knows what might be causing this problem ?
<12> i have already done the code for b-spline but need to know how to insert these 2 new points?
<13> is there anyone in this room that ever had that problem before ?
<10> linker errors, yeah. I've had them. just make sure you're linking all your .o files
<10> and make sure you have the code implemented for the function/cl***/whatever
<14> are you compiling using gcc or g++?
<13> YUY0x7, ah, sorry I wrote it was gcc, but it's actually g++
<13> jsaacmk, all my o files are included, of that I'm sure. and I feel really certain that all my functions are implemented
<10> did you link all your .o files?
<14> apparently there's a virtual function that's not being implemented
<13> the problem arrived when I split one cl*** into two cl***es.. and they both depend on eachother..
<13> I tried with this in one of the header files cl*** GraphPaintArea; so that it wouldn't complain about not knowing about the GraphPaintArea , is that ok ?
<13> but it looks like that the Constructor hasn't been implemented, but it has. I get two errors one with [not-in-charge] in the brackets and one [in-charge]
<13> cl*** B; cl*** A { cl*** B *b; } in another file cl*** A; cl*** B { cl*** A *a; } <-- is that ok ?
<10> cl*** A { cl*** B *b; }; // note the semicolon at the end there
<0> tommy_: yup
Return to
#c++
or
Go to some related
logs:
#php
> which newspaper did mahatma ghandhi edit during his stay in south africa?
Mirc sounds
what european capital saw the gulag archipelago 1918-1956
#windows
#AllNiteCafe
#php
ITEMS USED TO BE TEMPORARILY STORED IN PUB CELLARS
myspace is like goatse
#apache
|
|