| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Comments:
<0> an FMS, for example.
<1> that's where the software comes in
<0> Yup.
<2> Noidea: commas go outside if you follow UK english..
<0> So what's their software like?
<1> which is what the position is for...
<1> i don't know
<1> never used it
<0> well, lets do this.
<0> As I'm leaving company X, no big loss. When my product Y sorts itself out in AU, we'll have a parle and integrate the two.
<0> and take a % of the deal.
<0> :)
<0> These are the guys my old company has a deal with:
<0> http://www.vetronix.com/
<0> they do similar stuff, but without the FMS backend.
<3> Trimble also does vehicle automation
<3> trucks that drive themselves
<1> yeah
<3> exciting stuff, huh?
<3> just like Novariant
<0> *crunch* :)
<1> they described crop machines that drive themselves after a driver shows the unit the first stroke
<1> and repeats that stroke (doesn't have to be back and forth, can be arced)
<0> sounds like *********ion, to me.
<1> heh
<3> yup, the terminators are coming.
<3> it won't be long now.
<0> would you rather be killed By T2 or T-Combine?
<3> neither sounds pleasant.
<4> TX if it looked like Ms. Loken
<3> Terminator X?
<3> isn't he in Public Enemy?
<4> TX was the one in terminator 3
<4> played by christanna loken
<0> You wouldn't even have time to wank, schoolboy. You'd be DOA.
<4> it was a joke
<0> Mine too, I wasn't commenting on your possible ***ual promiscuity and various advances that have worked or failed for you.
<0> :)
<4> and in the presence of a Loken-lookalike I wouldn't be thinking "wank"
<4> :)
<0> peterhu: after some talk with a guy, it appears that Trimble are a leading GPS company, however, it's meant for a usually small fleet operator to be able to collect data and look at it online, or to integrate in to a 3rd party FMS.
<0> Ergo, similar to vetronix.
<1> perhaps that's what trimble mobile solutions is looking to change
<1> deliver on the whole package
<1> not sure
<5> sdf
<0> Space-Delimited-File.
<0> Thanks, come again.
<5> dsa
<1> sigh, i wish these dinks would include the VC++ part of the visual studio installer
<5> ata no
<1> in this virtual image
<5> lasa-te ma
<1> christ, this diff tool is uberretarded
<1> "sourcegear"
<1> never even heard of their SCC offering, blah
<6> why not just use plain diff, then?
<1> oh
<1> my
<1> god
<1> this build setup they have is horrendous
<5> ert
<1> for it to work, you have to make local files writable
<7> they write local files?
<1> they copy **** around from the SCC tree to other locations (done initially it succeeds, subsequent times it fails as the files are read only, by default)
<1> so what do they do?
<1> do they re-think what the **** they're doing?
<1> nope, they recommend you sync your tree entirely and make it writable
<7> who are these clowns?
<1> off shore people
<8> "off shore" luxury cruise people? I wonder what it's like on that boat, is it still running?
<9> =*
<10> if i declair a variable static, can i then declair it inside a cl*** member function normally and get the information that was prevously added to it?
<10> or am i looking at this the wrong way?
<7> wronw way
<10> ok
<10> is there a better way to globally share data
<7> well, no sure what all you're really saying
<7> what's the problem you're trying to solve?
<9> :x
<9> lol Lojkj
<10> im just trying to think of a better way to p*** this data along
<10> it's getting handed down to one object that's been declaired within some other objects
<10> i could p*** it along but it just seemed wasteful since only the very last object getting it is the one that needs it
<7> within?
<7> perhaps you need to re-evaluate your design
<7> and if you're "inside" an object you don't need to "globally share"
<9> hahahaha
<10> the value i want to p*** along isnt "inside"
<7> <10> it's getting handed down to one object that's been declaired within some other objects
<7> what's that mean?
<10> that's the alternative way of doing it
<9> si ya es maa
<10> i also said right after that that it seemed wastful
<7> I'm sorry I'm not understandingyou
<10> alright thanks anyway
<9> :)
<11> So here's a thought
<11> My cell phone accepts a 5 vdc .7 amp charger
<11> By my calculations, that's roughly equivalent to 4 nimh aa's or aaa's
<11> So if I were to obtain a little case for 4 aa's, and the right adaptor, I could wire up a battery power pack for it for probably under $10
<11> Or maybe 3 nonrechargeables
<9> lol Lojkj
<3> so?
<3> do it already then.
<3> it's likely that the circuits inside are actually 3.3V or something definitely lower than 5V
<3> so, you can probably safely go over voltage
<3> since there's probabaly already a regulator circuit in there stepping the voltage down to what it needs to be.
<11> http://www.robotstorehk.com/motordrivers/motordrivers_clip_image004_0000.jpg
<11> Ah
<11> Think it'd be okay to go under by .5v?
<3> Wait
<11> Or should I reach for the stars and go 6v
<3> the charger is 5V .7amp?
<3> or the battery?
<11> Yes
<3> there's a difference here.
<11> Charger
<11> Well
<3> are you trying to charge the phone?
<3> or power it?
<11> It's not by design a charger, you can run it without the battery with the charger thing
<3> or, are you trying to power it through the charger port?
<11> Whatever
<11> Right
<3> ok
<3> ummm
<3> AAs are 1.5V aren't they?
<11> AA's and AAA's (and probably most others) are 1.5V normally
<11> Rechargeables like NIMH are 1.2V
<3> ahhh, I see
<11> I'd like to be okay with either
<3> you want to know whether to go for 4.5 or 6
<11> Right
<3> Try 4.5 first
<3> if that doesn't work, try 6
<3> both should be safe
<11> Heh
<3> as your battery discharges
<11> I suppose that makes sense
<3> its voltage goes down
<11> Ah
<3> so it will drop through 4.5 volts as you use the phone anyway
<11> nod
<11> So that's 3 normal AA's or 4 rechargeables
<7> Li poly goes from around 4.2 down iirc
<11> Why do the rechargeables put out fewer volts?
<3> yup
Return to
#c++
or
Go to some related
logs:
#mirc
javascript crossite variables
php3 on apache2.2
#c++
#linux
WHAT IS THE FAMILY NAME IN THE H E BATES STORY A LITTLE OF WHAT YOU FANCY
fannyrider
javascript caret position value.search
#javascript
wolfrage undernet
|
|
