| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Comments:
<0> heh, i saw CIA job adds on monster for "clandestine operations"
<0> i wonder if they'd hire james bond
<0> hu = huene
<1> no, it is a member of the object that own the validate() method
<0> german origin
<2> peterhu, maybe they need another patsy like oswald
<3> p***ing by value requires a call to the copy constructor
<0> adds = ads
<1> vaw: i understood that part ;)
<2> well i'm off like a prom dress
<2> bye
<0> JBlitzen had a nice prom dress
<0> i've seen the pictures
<0> though he was dateless
<1> I see you're point vawjrwrk. Maybe if I do a try catch{} block on all methods, and if there is any type of exceptions, then cast it to my own and throw it.
<1> that way I can use the stl methods, and if they generate en exception, I will warp with my own
<1> oh, but in the case of a parameter, it will happen outside of the try catch block
<0> all this to have a stalin like grasp on what exceptions are thrown heh
<1> peterhu: no, it is more to avoid catching exception that might never be thrown
<1> if something is thrown that I don't catch, them it will go to top handler
<0> how are you going to avoid that?
<1> by catching only the advertised ones
<1> if anything not advertised is thrown, my top handler will catch it
<3> mozai but then you might be causing the program to abort when someone above you could really FIX things
<0> except that unexpected() will get called if the function directly or indirectly throws a type that is not in the exception specifier list
<1> oh, would it abort if it throws something it doesn't advertise?
<3> mozai what peterhu said
<0> yes, that's why i said you only get runtime enforcement
<1> ok, then, it is of no use. Maybe it is better to just well document it instead
<1> and let the caller catch the documented exceptions
<3> sounds like a good plan
<0> that's my opinion, but you know what they say about opinions
<1> bah, i wasn't aware that it would abort...sorry
<1> in the end, the whole purpose for me of these exceptions specification is more a form of code self documenting.
<0> we can definitely aprpeciate that goal
<1> thank you
<4> is there anyone who is good in Fortran???
<0> #fortran?
<3> FORTRAN
<4> yeah
<0> and if no one is in that channel, there's your answer
<5> hheheh
<3> I never used FORTRAN, the 1st one I played with was FORTRAN II
<0> ooooh, did it answer all the questions from FORTRAN?
<0> that was quite the cliffhanger
<4> I'm trying to find a linearization algorythm code of non-linear model
<4> this could be code in another language also
<4> I'm looking for idea to start
<0> tacheyon beam?
<0> tachyon i guess would be the correct spelling
<0> oh well
<3> hyper-tachyon
<4> ?
<0> sorry, what you said sounded like star trek speak to me, so i gave you the answer which best appears to solve all problems in star trek
<0> fire a tachyon beam
<0> then you're good to go
<4> haha
<4> ok well is there a place on the web we I can find algorythm example???
<3> I thought dechyon fields were the latest word
<4> to solve mathematical problem?
<0> #math or google would be my bets
<4> ok
<3> Johnnyasd if google ain't helping, I dunno where to look... bu tifit's math, what peter said
<0> there's a few math nerds in here too, but i'm not one of them, sadly
<4> ok
<4> thanks
<0> no problem
<0> i do miss math though
<0> i haven't had a big reason to use it much professionally
<0> at least what i learned in college
<4> okay
<0> had i written a game engine or simulator, perhaps that'd be different
<0> working on developer tools doesn't quite call for complex differential equations
<3> or even simple differential equations
<0> indeed
<0> though i have become a master at addition and subtraction
<0> well, maybe not a master
<0> but at least experienced!
<0> combinatorics and graph theory is really the only math cl*** i use, heh
<0> oh, and the sadistic statistics for electrical engineers course? completely worthless!
<6> taught by dr evil himself
<0> easy A but man what a snoozefest
<0> the book was written in the 1800's i think
<4> mathematic doesn't change
<4> 1+1 will always I hope equal 2
<0> hmm, i need something to emerge
<0> my system's been up to date and has everything i need installed
<0> my laptop is sad when it's not building something
<0> hmm, kdevelop isn't installed. don't think i need it, but what the hell
<0> and i meant that the book was a first edition from the 1800s
<0> it was printed on animal hide!
<7> Brake pads = changed
<8> you had to take stats for engineers?
<7> JB > Khan
<0> yeah
<0> CS majors have to
<8> usually CS majors get out of the real math.
<0> pfft
<0> CS major = math minor
<8> pfft
<8> Computer Engineering = math minor
<8> CS = loser.
<3> JBlitzen did you change them yourself?
<7> Yah
<8> told you it's easy
<3> wasn't that hard, was it?
<8> even JB can do it
<1> guys, what happens if you advertise no expcetion throwing() and you throw one, or the code you use does, does it abort() as well?
<7> No, didn't have any trouble
<8> yes
<7> Caliper mounting bolt came out tough, but a little muscle got it
<1> ouch
<8> Thank God it only required a little muscle, huh JB?
<8> otherwise you'd have been screwed.
<8> you probably would have had to have a 12y/o girl help you out.
<6> from another planet
<7> Yeah, and if she wasn't available, you might have had to pinch hit, ni
<8> that's not really an insult to me, you're still saying I'm stronger than you.
<7> Haha
<8> and, that you're weaker than a 12y/o girl
<0> CpE = .8 EE, .15 CS .5 bitch
<0> erm .05
<0> I AM A MATH GENIUS!
<8> yeah, I can see you got that math minor.
<7> Haha
<0> i actually didn't
<0> i had to take one more course
<0> proofs
<0> screw that!
<0> i had enough of proofs from my 4000 level algorithms course
<0> as a CS major, i didn't have to take EE courses except for the stats course, so i was happy
<0> i didn't have to take physics for engineers either, but i already had by the time i jumped off the CpE ship
<8> booo!
<8> CompE is better
<8> what's wrong with you!?!
<8> You could be doing verification with me
<0> pfft
<8> think how much more fun your life would be
<0> i'd rather make more doing software
<0> PWN
<9> financial engineering > *
<8> I'm not 6fig yet, but I'm pretty close.
<8> so, it's not like I'm poorly paid.
<9> pfff
<9> you want 7 figs
<7> Pretty close could mean anything, technically
<8> true
<8> but, whatever
<7> Yes
<7> At the end of the day, khan is still gaey
<0> heh
Return to
#c++
or
Go to some related
logs:
#MissKitten
#apache
#MissKitten
grub hangs at LOADING STAGE 1.5 poweredge
BuBBliCiouS counterstrike
kiku pornstars
blackmusik.fm
#linux
irssi protection dcc send
#AllNiteCafe
|
|