| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Comments:
<0> yes
<0> so i received the same error
<1> unlikely
<2> uh... what was the signature of main()
<0> void main()
<2> bzzzt
<2> int main(int argc, char **argv) // although parameters can be left out, I think
<1> and the return type too
<2> I think even the standard says int main() is acceptable now
<2> but I'm not sure, I'm very out of date :(
<0> same error
<1> well link the files together -.-
<3> int main() has always been acceptable.
<2> _m_: I know it's been linkable, wasn't sure if it was "proper"
<3> It has always been proper, too.
<3> In fact, void main() is wrong.
<3> calc void main
<4> void main = void main() isn't C89 *or* C++. See http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/C-faq/q11.12.html, http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/C-faq/q11.14.html, and http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/C-faq/q11.15.html . For C99, see http://homepages.tesco.net/~J.deBoynePollard/FGA/legality-of-void-main.html .
<2> _m_: hmm, I thought that K&R said that main() should always have the two args
<3> Uhm, this is #C++. K&R is irrelevant.
<2> _m_: I know, but I know C a lot better than I know C++, so I fall back to C-isms a lot
<2> I apologize
<0> so what the wrong think i did ?
<2> georgesUHF: "void main()"
<0> i tried int main()
<1> georgesUHF: do you have more than 1 file?
<0> i have a cl*** , 1 function , and 1 header file
<1> that isnt an answer
<0> i have only a header file
<3> and where did you put the implementation?
<3> Likely, the IDE ignored the header file, didn't find anything to compile, and thus didn't find an implementation of main() to link.
<0> can i send my lil program to someone ? to see it ,, its nothink than 1 cl*** containing 1 function and i try to call it.
<3> So, put your implementation into a source file instead of a header file and try again.
<0> ok
<5> hm
<5> hm, is anyone here into .net
<6> fishing.net
<2> hey bealtine
<5> bealtine: heh... other kind of net
<6> .net w/ c++ or what?
<5> yeah c++.net
<5> sorry for not mentioning it..
<6> managed or c++/cli ?
<5> hm, I have no real idea about the difference..
<5> but yeah manages..
<5> managed
<6> vc2003 or vc2005 then?
<5> yeah 2005
<7> grumble
<5> just upgraded from 2003 today
<6> then its c++/cli
<6> ahhh
<7> 'morning
<7> except I haven't slept yet :/
<5> and I havent been doing any .net..
<5> or well just a bit with the express edition..
<6> let me guess your old mc++ code won't compile?
<7> so what's your question?
<5> What's a good book ;)
<8> can anybody help me with this: RCalcKorrektur.obj : error LNK2019: Verweis auf nicht aufgelstes externes Symbol ""public: static struct CRuntimeCl*** * __stdcall RCalcKorrektur::RData::GetThisCl***(void)" (?GetThisCl***@RData@RCalcKorrektur@@SGPAUCRuntimeCl***@@XZ)" in Funktion ""public: void __thiscall RCalcKorrektur::RData::Serialize(cl*** CArchive &,bool,bool)" (?Serialize@RData@RCalcKorrektur@@QAEXAAVCArchive@@_N1@Z)".
<7> eh, good question
<7> suriel - mind translating?
<5> and how would I create a global, "serialport"
<8> i think it has something to do with serialisation and the IMPLEMENT_SERIAL and IMPLEMENT_SERIAL2 -marko (vc8)
<7> oh, yeah looks like it
<7> that silly MFC crap
<8> rdragon: linker-error. link to unresolved external symbol
<8> converting a vc6-project to vc2005...
<7> did you use both DECLARE_SERIAL and IMPLEMENT_SERIAL macros for the cl***?
<7> (lets see some code)
<8> rdragon: rdate is a innercl*** of RCalcKorrektur
<7> suriel paste your code onto the paste site
<8> rdragon: wait a minute please. ill poste some code...
<7> k
<5> *yawn*
<8> rdragon: http://www.noidea128.org/sourcefiles/15861.html
<7> suriel...
<7> RData does not inherit from RCalcKorrektur...
<7> actually, IMPLEMENT_SERIAL2 doesn't even return any results from an msdn search - what is it?
<8> rdragon: no. its just an inner cl***
<7> it's cl*** name is RCalcKorrektur::RData, i believe
<8> rdragon: mfcext.h #define IMPLEMENT_SERIAL2(baseBase, cl***_name, base_cl***_name, wSchema) \
<8> CObject* PASCAL baseBase::cl***_name::CreateObject() \
<8> { return new baseBase::cl***_name; } \
<8> _IMPLEMENT_RUNTIMECL***2(baseBase, cl***_name, base_cl***_name, wSchema, \
<8> cl***_name::CreateObject) \
<8> static AFX_CL***INIT _init_##cl***_name(RUNTIME_CL***2(baseBase,cl***_name)); \
<8> CArchive& AFXAPI operator>>(CArchive& ar, baseBase::cl***_name* &pOb) \
<8> { pOb = (baseBase::cl***_name*) ar.ReadObject(RUNTIME_CL***2(baseBase,cl***_name)); \
<8> return ar; } \
<7> oh
<6> arrrgggh mfc muck
<7> did you have to DECLARE_DYNAMIC and all that nonsense, maybe?
<7> I really don't know, just taking guesses
<7> it's complaining because it can't find the definition for RCalcKorrektur::RData::GetThisCl***()
<8> rdragon: i dont know either ;-( i just loaded the code from a vc6-project where it worked fine
<3> in-channel code pastes ****, too.
<5> hm
<5> rdragon: so did you have any idea about my question?
<6> what was your question (it got lost during an mfc paste)
<5> How do I create a global serialPort object
<5> so I wont have to re-create a new one for each form I want to have serial communications in..
<7> what's a serialPort object?
<5> or well compnent or what you clall it
<6> is it a cl*** and is this c++ or mc++ ?
<5> c++
<5> it's a component
<6> myserialport port in a .cpp and then in a .h file extern myserialport port;
<5> heres how it's initialized in the form
<5> this->serialPort1 = (gcnew System::IO::Ports::SerialPort(this->components));
<6> mc++
<7> c++/cli
<5> yeah
<5> hm, works now
<5> although not global..
<7> pbbbbbllllll
<9> s
<10> I have a number, say 220, I would like to know if the first number is 2 or not, should I use a bitwise operators or something like int i=220; if((i/100) == 2) dosomething;
<9> I'm sorry
<7> threat - what if the number is 4 digits long?
<10> rdragon, its always 3
<7> never less?
<10> (FTP server reply code)
<10> never less then 3 either
<3> while(n>10) n/=10; if (n == 2)
<10> hmm
<3> if (reply_code >=200 && reply_code < 300)
<10> isnt there a better way to do it using bitwise operators?
<10> _m_, thanx
<7> no
<6> long division
<6> as in school...
<3> useless division, too, in this special case.
<7> if( 200 <= reply && reply < 300 )
<10> rdragon, ?
<3> That's better style.
<7> yes?
<10> rdragon, you ment >= instead of <= ?
<7> nope
<10> oh yeah
<7> just fits the 'typical' style better like 200 <= x < 300
<10> just looks like a weird way to say it ;P
<7> [200,300)
<10> ok thanx
<10> I hate maths :P
<7> it hates you too
<10> I know :(
<7> times a billion
<10> heh
<10> pwned
Return to
#c++
or
Go to some related
logs:
#linux
#AllNiteCafe
#AllNiteCafe
PHP SESSID
boyprety
#teens
#apache
#php
animuisic
schnaader
|
|