| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5
Comments:
<0> i have a function push: void push(NODE *sNode, NODE *top)
<0> where sNode is to be added to a stack whose top is referenced by Node top
<0> when i exit the function NODE gets set back to NULL
<0> when i exit the function top gets set back to NULL
<0> is there a way to p*** a pointer by value?
<0> someone please help
<1> _m_: I got it down to 142 lines - can you have another look?
<1> <0> when i exit the function NODE gets set back to NULL
<1> That is nonsense.
<1> NODE is a type, it can't be changed.
<2> kahlua75 perhaps you should post your code at the website in the topic
<1> top can't be changed either
<1> void push(NODE *sNode, NODE *top) already p***es the pointer 'top' by value.
<1> vawjr: Can you try to compile something of me with a different compiler than g++, but one that support 'typeof'?
<3> Is there a decent cross-platform framework which also has a good GUI builder for C++? I know about Qt but I'd like to know if there are any good alternatives.
<2> what platforms interest you
<4> wxWidgets
<2> Run typeof is so non-standard it's hardly in any compilers
<1> wxWidgets ****s
<3> Windows, Linux, MacOS X
<2> I've _heard_ that g++ has it
<2> .NET (use mono on Linux and Max)
<2> err, Mac
<3> does that have good gui builder?
<1> what about GTK+ ?
<3> I thought about GTK+...
<3> at the moment I have either Qt or GTK+ in mind
<1> I decided on GTK+ because of the license.
<3> yes... the license is an issue. I don't mind keeping it open source, but it is a university project
<1> But I suppose Qt is still as QPL - I think the other is GPL, isn't it?
<3> so I'm not sure if it must be kept "closed" for so and so long
<3> I'm speaking to my tutor tomorrow, he might know
<5> http://www.noidea128.org/sourcefiles/16280.html . My program was working . Now i'm tryng to put it like with functions , but i am having no output. I tried to change the functions to return something,but no result. Could someone help me ?
<3> if i created a program solely for my project.. which means personal use / marking by university.. surely I can do that without conflicting with Qt's license?
<3> also if it works out to something that isn't a pile of tripe I'd quite happily make it open source when allowed by the university
<6> Pablo, you have to actually print the answers at the end... like cout << milhar << endl;
<5> i am sure i tried something like it...i will check.
<5> No i didn't. I tried to print mil , cent , but not the arrays.
<5> Moonshine: Could u help me with other problem ? I am not getting the numbers in range 10 - 99 (function imprimedezenas)
<3> Qt really does look great... but somebody in here commented on something to do with pre-compilation which is bad or something
<5> forgot,i fixed.thx
<5> =]
<1> _m_: I found the problem... there is a loop dependency between BinaryExpression and binary_operator: the return type of a function of BinaryExpression depends on binary_operator, which in turn depends on BinaryExpression.
<5> well...i'm gonna rest a bit.
<5> c u all and thx
<1> This is definitely the most complex templated code I ever coded...
<1> I managed to break the compile-cl***-dependency with an extra inheritance and static_cast, plus 3 extra overload per operator, heheh.
<7> wow, that's amazing
<8> ...huh?
<8> heh
<1> template<bool inverted, cl*** EXPR1, beop_type OP, cl*** EXPR2>
<1> bool BinaryExpression<inverted, EXPR1, OP, EXPR2>::evaluate(void)
<1> {
<1> binary_operator<inverted, EXPR1, OP, EXPR2>::return_type result =
<1> static_cast<BinaryExpressionDerived<inverted, EXPR1, OP, EXPR2>*>(this)->evaluate_impl();
<1> return only_p***_if_bool(result);
<1> }
<1> Still have to implement only_p***_if_bool... but then it should work
<1> I'll put some interesting code on the paste site ;)
<1> I *do* get a headache of the error messages though...
<1> ../../ircproxy/src/Expression.h: In member function typename binary_operator<inverted, T1, OP, T2>::return_type BinaryExpressionDerived<inverted, EXPR1, OP, EXPR2>::evaluate_impl() [with bool inverted = false, EXPR1 = WatchedExpression<UserModeMask>, beop_type OP = beop_BITWISE_AND, EXPR2 = ConstExpression<char>]:
<1> [difficult 'instantiated from' list]
<1> ../../ircproxy/src/Expression.h:863: error: no match for call to (binary_operator<false, WatchedExpression<UserModeMask>, beop_BITWISE_AND, ConstExpression<char> >) (const UserModeMask&, const char&)
<1> ../../ircproxy/src/Expression.h:855: note: candidates are: __typeof__ (((T1*)(0)->.evaluate_impl() & (T2*)(0)->.evaluate_impl())) binary_operator<false, T1, beop_BITWISE_AND, T2>::operator()(const T1&, const T2&) [with T1 = WatchedExpression<UserModeMask>, T2 = ConstExpression<char>]
<1> Gotta love that.
<9> Whee
<4> Jslutzen
<4> you sre back
<4> JSlutzen
<9> Wut
<4> where were you
<9> Vacation
<4> damn
<4> where
<9> Just NY with my family
<4> NYC or NY
<9> Upstate
<4> ah word
<4> khan will finally be out of depression now that you are back
<9> Heh
<8> oh mannnn
<8> jb's back
<8> to his old texan self
<9> Hi rd
<8> how's NY?
<9> Cold and overcast as always
<8> hehe
<8> how was the trip, otherwise?
<9> Good but I took two dramamine on the way back and now I can barely stand up
<8> heh
<1> It compiles!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
<1> Finally :)
<8> now to get it to work
<1> It also works
<1> NOTICE : Entering UserMode::new_server_message_received({prefix:"lskdkglkjal!*@*", command:"MODE" [key:-18], params:{"lskdkglkjal", "+ix"}})
<1> NOTICE : Entering ExpressionEventRequestQueue::trigger(ExpressionEventType const& {expression_value:true, expression:"((UserMode::M_mask & ConstExpression<char>(x)) == ConstExpression<UserModeMask>("+x"))"})
<1> NOTICE : Calling ServerConnection::callback_test({expression_value:true, expression:"((UserMode::M_mask & ConstExpression<char>(x)) == ConstExpression<UserModeMask>("+x"))"})
<1> :)
<1> In other words, I get a callback as soon as the usermode is set to +xi
<1> That was done with:
<1> ON_TRUE((*M_identity->user_mode() & ConstExpression<char>('x')) == ConstExpression<UserModeMask>('x'), *this, &ServerConnection::callback_test);
<1> Basically, I can now add any expression with multiple variables - and it will call a callback function as soon as the expression turns true.
<1> Those variables will have to be wrapped in a template, but that template is opague to all operations on it... Ie, M_identity->user_mode() returns actually a Watched<UserMode> reference.
<10> , missed it.
<10> mistell.
<10> hmmmm. you are employing STL and ... and a design pattern of some kind.
<1> zeitnot: me?
<10> yes. right?
<11> harro
<10> i am guessing this code is running in some flavor of unix.
<1> zeitnot: I don't think it's a design pattern - I just made it up myself. And it doesn't use the STL except somewhere in some detail where I use a set<> of boost::shared_ptr's to keep a list of expression-event-servers that have a reference to that particular watched variable.
<11> how can i change the timeout on a recv() winsock2
<12> that's weird Run
<12> what's the point?
<12> you crazy programmers
<12> always doing ridiculous things that have no purpose.
<11> dammit
<11> curse setsockopt()
<10> i'm no win32 wizard, but setsockopt sounds right to me.
<10> do you have that win32.hlp file?
<11> bleh
<11> i've checked it on msdn
<10> msdn is full of .NET stuff these days... hard to find win32 things.
<11> you're supposed to be able to set the timeout of a recv() with setsockopt(), which I have done, but my program is still coming to a standstill in a recv()
<11> zeitnot; tell me about it
<10> you are definitely doing a non-blocking receive?
<11> i don't know what 'non-blocking' means
<10> well, is recv() waiting until there's data and then returning it, or is it just checking for data, returning anything available, and then moving on immediately?
<10> if you've set the timeout value, then some other option is not quite right.
<11> i have a while loop that recv()'s a buffer, checks if there's anything in it, does the appropriate action, and then repeats
<10> okay. lemme see...
<11> k..
<13> can anyone refer me to a channel that supports directshow, or may i ask politely here?
<9> Go ahead and ask here
<10> um. in the MSDN page i'm looking at,
<10> it gives a short list of BSD options that are not supported for setsockopt():
<10> and SO_RCVTIMEO is one of th em.
<10> them, even.
<13> well, im trying to use the vmr9 filter. and it works great to some extent. i can only render a file stream.
<13> im using a video overlay to render my tv tuner stream
<13> i'd like to get the tv tuner to render with vmr9, so i can put an bitmap mixer on it
<13> i dont know how to connect the pins to the tv tuner, or if im missing a filter or not
<11> zeitnot; http://www.noidea128.org/sourcefiles/16281.html
<11> zeitnot; oh ok, elsewhere i read that it was available with winsock2
<11> if i can't use SO_RECVTIMEO then how else could i do it?
<10> well, i could be wrong. lemme look a little more.
<11> ok, i just left it running for a while, and it does eventually get out of the recv(), but it takes like 5 mins :/
<10> interesting. what was the timeout value?
<10> check this url out, by the way.. it might be useful: http://www.intel.com/cd/ids/developer/asmo-na/eng/76431.htm?prn=Y
<11> 1000
Return to
#c++
or
Go to some related
logs:
did the title character in John Fowles's The Collector collect
miniclit
ISO C90 gentoo
#AllNiteCafe
#mirc
637-2690
#c++
#c++
#linux
st312082 driver
|
|