| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Comments:
<0> hmm, seems like this trimble job is more C# than C++
<0> still, it's no travel, 25 minute commute, and is a product based position
<1> what? no more MS, Peter?
<0> not for more than a year now
<0> i left before beta 2
<1> Hmm. I guess I've not been on here for that long, then :)
<0> which was, at the time i left, supposed to be out a month after i left, didn't turn out that way =)
<2> They found a lot of khancode that required fixing prerelease
<1> What've you been doing since? Surely not job hunting?
<2> He's been working at that place that shipped him to Florida for a few months
<0> i've been a full time consultant since then
<1> ah - overpaid, eh? :>>
<0> not enough =)
<0> considering what i see sales people take in, not nearly enough
<0> i wouldn't consider $150,000 a year for a software engineering position to be overpaid =)
<0> as some sales people pull in twice that selling the products the engineers have put just as much time into
<1> hmm. An contracted consultant salesman...that would have to imply lotsa dough :)
<1> Hmmph. I make nowhere near 150K US. :((
<0> nor do i =)
<0> few more levels and i might though
<2> You get any six digit offers yet?
<1> If we make this release, I wonder if I'll get a pay raise at the next review. They've brought the thing forward :|
<0> we'll see what these trimble people offer
<0> they have to at least match my current salary
<0> which is not far off
<2> Perhaps they'll throw in access to male thai prostitutes
<3> oooh
<3> what a bonus
<1> lol
<0> that would clinch it
<3> do you not feel consulting is a loser sort of job? (honest question)
<0> no, not really
<0> i've certainly seen a share of people i wouldn't want to work with normally
<3> like you're not actually accomplishing anything?
<0> but i've met plenty of consultants i highly respect for their ability
<3> no, ability aside
<0> oh, i accomplish enough
<3> but in terms of satisfaction
<3> hm ok
<2> I find it more satisfying, if anything
<0> and i'm satisfied with what i'm doing, but it's just different from being part of a constant team working on a product
<3> how come JB?
<2> You have a closer relationship to your clients, and you're a bigger cog in a smaller machine
<0> yeah, that's another thing
<0> clients
<0> dealing with them
<0> i don't like to
<2> pwned
<0> usually they're considerably dumber than your average retard
<3> you know, because on a product, you can say, look, I made this
<0> that's not always a good thing =)
<3> haha
<0> i've been trying to distance myself with some of vc8
<2> I can look at companies and say I alone made the system that revolutionized their business
<3> I suppose
<0> i can say i've helped secure 3 million american's personal information from one gig
<2> Yeah
<0> good lord their security practices
<0> vb6 shop, through and through
<0> scary ****
<2> Heh
<4> meh
<3> ?
<5> i have a funtion void ArrInt(int *h[]){*h[0] = 1;} and in main i have int k[2]; ArrInt(&k[]);
<5> how do i get that to work
<5> ?
<6> k is not an int *[]
<6> void ArrInt( int h[] ) { h[0] = 1; }
<6> ArrInt( k );
<6> Or
<6> void ArrInt( int (*h)[2] ) { (*h)[0] = 1; }
<6> ArrInt( &k )
<5> hum , why the (*h)?
<7> KBM why are you mucking w/ arrays?
<6> Because int * h[2] and int (* h)[2] are completely different types
<4> KBM - that's what you get for messing around with funky arrays
<5> ok question
<5> can i have void ArrInt( int (*h)[] )
<6> Nope
<5> say i dont know how big the array is?
<4> why aren't you using std::vector's?
<4> (thats what they're for)
<6> Array pointers is just syntax suga
<6> +r
<5> i dun get it, explain - please
<6> An array doesn't really have an address
<7> KBM WHY ARE YOU MUCKING W/ ARRAYS
<6> Probably to learn the language
<5> yes thank you ashe
<7> he doesn't know enough of it now
<7> ****ing w/ all this minutae is what makes people quit learning
<5> you guys act about arrays like a goto statement
<7> well you sure as **** shouldn't learn them early in your career
<4> KBM you're trying to treat arrays as dynamic arrays
<5> right like char *
<5> why cant i do that to ints?
<4> eh?
<6> Arrays is pretty basic stuff, like pointers and ehm templates and ehm..
<6> Ok, I guess everything is basic
<7> right, but dynamic arrays and char* etc. require a LOT of detail knowlege to use the correctly
<5> ok with char k [200] u can send it to say void g(char *y)
<7> KBM you can do it with ints
<5> with no prob
<5> why cant i do that to ints?
<7> KBM except you can't tell how much of the 200 things have actual data
<7> and you can do exactly that with ints
<6> Just replace char with int, and it'll work
<4> void f( int* i ){ /* is i an array or a single int? if array, how big is it? hmm */ }
<4> void f( vector<int> i ){ /* oh, life is good */ }
<7> rdragon same problem, actually, with char*
<6> +&
<5> cannot convert parameter 2 from 'int (*)[3]' to 'int *'
<6> -& for KBM
<6> (the +& was for rdragon ;))
<4> heh
<7> KBM what did you put in your program? that error doesn't make sense
<4> KBM if that's your error then your code doesn't reflect what you said here
<6> Yes it does
<6> He p***ed &a instead of a
<6> Where a is int a[3]
<7> then he didn't just change char to int
<7> like we told him to do
<5> ok i got it
<5> lol u were right ash
<5> *ashe
<5> this is wat i have int *piNumbers; - piNumbers = new int[iKeepTrack+1]; - ParseInt(sInput, piNumbers);
<5> void ParseInt(string sSource, int *piIncom)
<6> I guess stringstream does everything you want
<6> And you'd better p*** the size of piIncom if you want to use an array
<8> .NET 2005 IDE, can I have the help inside the IDE as 2003 had ?
<5> ashe do u like c++.net?
<6> KBM: I prefer pizzas
<6> (and I don't know if you mean managed c++ or c++/cli)
<9> hi 'gain
<9> I'm gettin a linker error now
<9> or rather, a set of linker errors
<6> Such as?
<9> hold on, was trying to cut and paste and emacs quit
<6> Heheh
<1> ctrl-z would minimise it....
<9> main.cpp:27: undefined reference to 'astar<misstate>::init_s(misstate)'
<1> on some systems, at least.
<6> Well, define that method
<9> no, I just clicked on the window and it quit with an X11 protocol error
<9> it's defined, declared, included...
<1> psh
<6> Guess it's not
<1> it obviously doesn't think it is.
<9> right
<9> lemme paste what _should_ be enough code to show why I think it should work :P
<9> not in here
Return to
#c++
or
Go to some related
logs:
#mirc
spermazoid cocktail
#php
croisaunts
#AllNiteCafe
ibm hold music
dr3f
#linux
lezbiana
assholefeever
|
|