| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Comments:
<0> Pontiac
<0> GM
<0> GM does ****
<0> but, whatever
<1> exactly =)
<1> JB loves GM
<2> Wait a second, I love GM trucks
<0> my P***at's been in the shop.
<2> GM cars are a whole different ball game
<0> but, only under warranty
<0> we'll see how it does now.
<1> because GM tells him through ads that he will be more of a man for purchasing a GM truck he doesn't need
<2> You should see the ads down here
<1> do you moonlight as a contractor?
<2> They're the one thing thing that would make me avoid GM
<1> need to haul lumber?
<2> It's always "real texans drive our truck" or whatever
<2> What a stupid crock of redneck ****
<2> Excellent, a new 24 is on tonight
<1> yeah, unfortunately there aren't 2 hours in a day
<3> hmm, trade-in value on my car is down to $6k (subaru forester)
<1> i'll let someone draw you a diagram
<1> i think mine's $3
<2> Never trade-in
<1> i like paying taxes on junker too
<1> $20? i think i can swing that!
<3> jb why not?
<2> You can always get more with private sale
<3> nod
<1> $3K that is
<2> And it's one less thing to have to negotiate when buying the next car
<2> Or truck if you're a male
<1> if jb drives a truck, i'm not sure why any man would want one
<2> Preferrably something manufactured in this century
<4> jello
<4> hello*
<2> There's always room for hello
<4> ;-d
<4> hmm is the c++ in 21 days book ne good?
<3> no
<4> i
<4> o*
<3> http://www.rudbek.com/books.html
<4> yea was looking
<4> think i might get accelerated
<4> but yea
<4> ne1 here try it out?
<3> lots - it's good.
<4> hmm
<4> well kthnx
<5> G'morning
<5> Just wondering what is the standard C++ way to access directory and get all subdirectory?
<3> there is none
<3> but check out the boost.filesystem library
<5> if i'm not mistaken that one is plan to be add to standard c++ , but not yet...
<3> possibly, but i've not heard the same
<6> NoobsGeek, you could #include <unistd.c>
<6> oops
<6> .h even
<5> II'm on windows side...
<6> whatis boost anyway? is it like experiemental code that will soon be part of the C++ standard?
<6> NoobsGeek, the dark side
<6> NoobsGeek, come to the light!
<5> :P will be there soon
<3> no threat, it's just a collection of libraries
<5> this is for work... a man got to do what he got to do heh heh
<3> the intent is to create libraries that could possibly get into the standard, though
<6> hehe
<6> rdragon, ok :)
<3> it provides the community review and such
<6> nice
<6> rdragon, I shall try it
<5> if i'm not mistaken it goes into review process but have some issue...
<6> nice, there is boost debian packages
<5> there should be another review soon...
<6> NoobsGeek, how often does the C++ standard yet reviewed, and more libs added to it/?
<5> i have no idea...
<5> I am just a noobs
<5> :D
<7> ditto :)
<7> go team n00b!
<3> threat there's only been one standard. the next one should be finished before 2010
<3> (the previous standard was 1998)
<5> http://www.boost.org/
<5> So we all have to wait 2010 before anything good happen to standard c++
<7> NoobsGeek, simply type in apt-get install "libboost-*-dev"
<7> :P
<5> :( by that time .NET will mature enough to chalenge standard c++
<8> NoobsGeek: You don't have to wait until 2010 to start using good practices, though. For example, using boost instead of recoding the functionalities it provides.
<7> .NET :S
<8> How does .Net challenge standard C++? It'S a framework. You can use .NET through C++/CLI.
<3> you can use boost::shared_ptr, and once it becomes standard it'll probably become std::shared_ptr
<8> They're not competing.
<5> oh! good then
<5> so they are more like working in tandem or something?
<3> they're kinda mutex
<5> One question about boost ... will I have to distribute anything extra with my application like additional dll
<7> NoobsGeek, shouldnt
<3> not usually. depends on what libraries you use and how you link to them, though
<3> 'boost' is not a library itself
<3> it's made up of a bunch of libraries
<3> many of those libraries are header-only. some have to be compiled though
<5> that sounds great... I'll give it a try
<5> Thanks Threat, rdragon and drkMatter...
<5> this few years has been great years for fellow developers ;)
<5> Threat, what kind of work opportunity one have for c++ programmer on Linux...
<9> anyone here interested in a laptop? 600$ gets you a centrino based laptop, ipod, carry case and wireless router. message me if interested
<10> what is alfa cleaner
<11> msdn says c++ is good as a bridging language in .net apps - does that mean like from a c# back-end and perhaps asp.net online front-end ?
<12> anyone can help me? this code compiles on VS2003 but not on gcc.".... error: no match for call to `(const __gnu_cxx::hash<C>) (const C&)'"
<12> http://84.90.96.199/error.cpp
<3> again?
<3> weren't you here the other day with the exact same code?
<4> lol
<12> it was diferent.. for me...
<3> obviously it's not compiling against the same headers when you comepile with g++
<3> it looks like it cant find a hash function for C
<3> that's probably one of the template parameters
<3> of course, hash maps are nonstandard and nonportable
<3> so you're probably going to have difficulty using the same code and just including different headers
<3> does boost have a hash map? if so, that's your best bet at portability
<3> otherwise, I guess you'll need to create your own that can use any of the nonstandard ones internally
<12> i dont want portablity... i just want it to compile.
<3> uh
<3> you do want portability
<3> that's why you've got that mess of junk at the top
<3> including the 'appropriate' header, depending on what platform you're compiling against
<12> hash_map implementations are available on many platforms...
<3> exactly
<3> and they ALL WORK DIFFERENTLY
<3> which is why you're having trouble
<12> i doesnt compile with hash_map<int, int*> .... the same error "undefined reference to `operator new(unsigned int)'"
<3> you said it "works" under vs2003 but not g++ - that's the definition of nonportable
<12> among others
<3> how is "undefined reference to `operator new(unsigned int)'" the same as "error: no match for call to `(const __gnu_cxx::hash<C>) (const C&)'"
<3> ?
<12> rdragon no...! but can you help me with the error?
<3> i told you to begin with - it looks like it can't find a hash function for objects of type C
<3> and that you probably have to provide one as one of the template args
<3> of course, that's specific to the hash map implementation you're trying to use, so it may differ across platforms
<3> which gets us back to the portability issue
<12> okk i will try to check it out.. thanks!
<13> managed extensions ****
<3> managed extensions to C++ ?
<3> yes, they do
<3> try C++/CLI
<8> Managed extensions, or C++/CLI?
<13> is it possible to move the mouse cursor n pixels left in c++
<8> That's not something C++ bothers itself with. It depends on your environment.
<8> Are you wroking in windows or *nix?
Return to
#c++
or
Go to some related
logs:
#squid
#squid
#linux
#c
stringtotime php
#linuxhelp
#linux
asciimation bufferedreader java
yo-rajat
eurovis craiova
|
|