| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Comments:
<0> on a bicycle?
<1> family guy time, later
<2> oh, and everyone has to wear a helmet on a motorcycle I think
<2> of course there are seatbelt laws here too, which I find obnoxious
<2> but, then, they did legalize medical marijuana
<2> which I think is right
<2> or a step in the right direction
<1> heh.
<0> i say legalize alltogether
<0> they sell liquor in the store so they might as well legalize marijuana
<2> but, now they're talking about taxing us all so there'd be state supported universal preschool
<2> stupid state.
<1> you think wearing a helmet on a motorcycle is stupid?
<2> I think making it a law is stupid
<2> I think people can make the decision for themselves.
<2> I don't like that kind of nanny state BS
<1> that's irrelevant
<0> it would probably cost the state more if they let people die because they don't use helmets
<2> having a stupid social program shouldn't be grounds for interfering in people's lives.
<1> you're on your motorcycle, without helmet, and get into an accident with a car, you die, and the other driver has to live with it
<2> that's life
<2> lots of things are dangerous
<3> Then we should all wear helmets when crossing a street just in case...
<2> and when biking
<1> are you suggesting that the law should let you be suicidal?
<2> and when climbing
<2> it's up to you to decide whether you think that's suicidal
<2> I mean, if youw ere actually suicidal
<2> it's hard to stop you from succeeding in killing yourself.
<0> here it's illegal to attemp suicide
<2> that's another stupid law WimS
<2> it should be legal do choose to die if that's what you really want.
<1> that's pretty shallow
<2> what's pretty shallow EwIck?
<1> the.. ah what the hell, the whole you
<2> ahhh, yeah, good one.
<1> anyway I said I was off for TV
<2> You're getting confused here
<1> we'll pick this up later, or never
<2> All I'm for is you being free to do what you like with your life.
<2> I don't like the idea of being banned from doing things I enjoy because soemone else decides it's too dangerous.
<2> for example, base jumping is now illegal in California
<2> because someone decided it's too dangerous
<2> of course, skiing is pretty dangerous
<0> it's illegal here too except some chosen places i think
<2> and in some places skiing out of bounds is illegal.
<3> I think knives should be illegal because they can be dangerous
<4> For the record, when I mentioned rights, I wasn't talking about the right to get stoned and jump off a bridge
<3> Same thing for fire
<2> smoking marijuana is still illegal in California
<2> so is suicide
<2> or, recreational use of marijuana
<2> that's more accurate
<2> I'm afraid of the way things are headed
<2> everytime someone gets hurt or dies doing something
<2> someone comes out and insists that they need to ban the activity
<2> for safety
<2> or, that it needs to be restricted
<2> mountain biking here for instance
<2> in a lot of the parks it's illegal to ride without a helmet
<2> they put speed limits for bikes on the bike paths
<2> at 15mph
<2> it's illegal to wander off the trail through the woods in the state parks
<2> it's now illegal to put bolts into rocks in state parks
<2> even though that's the safest way of securing a climber, and teh bolts are very hard to see.
<2> that's thanks to the environmentalists.
<2> I wen tot a place in Missouri where you were required to get a permit to rock climb
<2> God only knows why.
<5> is it ok with environmentally friendly bolts
<5> such as the bio-degradable variety
<0> sounds dangerous
<0> a degradable bolt
<2> It's illegal to camp at the base of any rock face in Yosemite, maybe all national parks, I'm not sure
<2> there's a risk of rocks falling off
<2> soooo many stupid laws to protect you from yourself
<2> climbing isn't allowed in a lot of parks
<2> too many people overly concerned with me living my life.
<2> and they come in and say, well, we've gotta pay the price for your public health care
<2> or we've gotta pay the price for your rescue if you get trapped, or stuck in an avalanche, or hurt
<2> It all seems simple to me, if the social program is the problem, cancel the social program
<2> or make it dependent on something
<0> i don't think that is the correct way in evolution
<2> I have no problem with your auto insurance saying they won't cover your medical expenses if you're not wearing your seatbelt
<2> say no public health care if you were doing something really dangerous and stupid.
<0> gonna be difficult to define
<2> what do you think they're doing now?
<2> everytime they make something illegal
<2> some activity
<2> it's based on this, "We have to pay for your healthcare" excuse
<2> so, these things we find to be too dangerous will just become illegal.
<2> how long before ski helmets are mandated?
<2> I don't like this push for complete safety everyone is on.
<2> life is dangerous
<2> people are going to die doing dumb things
<6> yeah, like having *** with bears
<6> just don't do it
<2> and, if you want to
<2> who am I to say you can't?
<2> go for it I say
<2> sneak up behind that bear, and force yourself on her.
<7> you don't have *** with bears, bears have *** with you
<2> maybe you'll end up with one hell of a story to tell your friends.
<4> Animal cruelty
<4> Ban it
<2> whatever, people and their perfect safety nonsense scare me.
<2> everytime a kid gets killed doing something, someone tries to p*** a law to ban it.
<2> like the requirement that you get trigger locks when you buy a gun
<2> stupid
<4> Well, talking about that is different than advocating the forced humping of a bear while stoned and contemplating jumping off a bridge
<2> I don't really mind suicide laws so much, depending on how they're applied
<2> if someone is terminally ill, and suffering a lot, I don't see any problem with them choosing to end their own life
<2> but, when someone tries to kill himself and fails at it
<2> It's pretty obviously a cry for help
<2> and having someone intervene is probably good
<3> As long as he's not endangering someone else's life..
<4> What's the difference?
<4> What does it matter if it's his life or someone else's that's endangered?
<4> It's not like you know either of them
<2> because the law is specifically there to protect people from each other
<2> that's the whole point
<4> The ultimate problem with that kind of moral latitude is that ultimately, there's no difference between anyone else and the bears
<2> protecting people from themselves shouldn't generally be the purpose of law.
<4> There's no law against bears killing themselves, because bears don't have moral value
<4> If they get in society's way, they lose
<6> heh ober's back in seoul
<4> Is he
<6> what a beeeotch
<4> kikiki
<4> ^-^
<4> You didn't laugh at my Korean humor
<8> I thought koreans went "kekeke", not "kikiki".
<4> Whatever
<8> Hehe.
<9> Hey, is it possible to code a program that could use the windows mouse (in windows) to react to something happening on the screen, in windows. Say... closing ads or make a repetitive action like playing a game for you ?
<7> you might try training a small monkey to drive the mouse for you
<9> I already tried... but the PETA took it away
<9> Beside the joke, any infos ?
<0> anything's possible , but you'd need to write some sort of AI
<7> well, you don't really need to move the mouse
<0> which would be complicated
<7> you need to send events to windows
<7> but beyond that I don't really know
<1> "playing a game for you"?!
<1> why bother?
<7> basically if you want to simulate a click, you want to grab a handle to the window you want to click in, ans send a click event
<9> It's just an example
<9> I won't do it, because... well you got it, it's pointless.
<1> so... why are we talking about this?
<9> I'm learning programmation
<10> emmm
<10> kinda stupid question
Return to
#c++
or
Go to some related
logs:
#c++
#AllNiteCafe
#MissKitten
#linux
#linux
fdreopen windows
#php
similaritytable_1 8gig
playing mpgs in linux
bad command `mdns off'
|
|