| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Comments:
<0> I've been the only gringo in El Paso twice.
<0> In a hotel within shooting distance of the border.
<1> gringo?
<2> i thought the whole point of texas was just to sunbathe
<1> with what gun?
<2> and sweat a lot.
<1> that could be miles Solamente
<1> depending on what gun
<1> what bullet
<1> and what angle.
<0> 7 iron
<3> JBlitzen: what was that article? it's a subscription article
<0> Pro V1
<2> dezaht eagool, five point oh.
<0> Howzat?
<1> ok, I've gotta shut this thing down
<1> power supply issues.
<3> Solamente: Austin, TX is the good part of texas
<4> ahh
<0> zbo: It does seem to produce guitar players
<4> First result here:
<4> http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=nfl+draft+loser+business
<0> Eric Johnson and Stevie Ray Vaughn being the finest examples.
<0> Never been there, though.
<3> Solamente: It's the #1 city in AMerica for single people
<0> So that means everyone's gay?
<3> JBlitzen: That result is not cached
<3> oh wait hmm
<3> thats strange... it loaded
<0> Kind of like Seattle was... if you're straight and you have all your limbs attached, girls will just about attack you.
<3> Oh. That is the story where the best pick in the draft is the second round.
<3> I read that.
<3> I am designing my own text-based sport simulation game. It's part of my research stuff.
<3> Solamente: That might explain a lot.
<5> what's the #1 city for married men?
<0> Salt Lake City, probably.
<5> hmm
<5> good idea
<4> This movie is so improbable
<5> jb is the ****?
<5> get me dinner
<3> Salt Lake City, or Anchorage, depending on your perspective :D
<0> Heh
<0> Yeah, if you can't get laid in Alaska, you're hopeless.
<0> If you don't mind your women a little shaggy.
<5> you know i don't!
<0> We know you're into chest hair.
<5> you know i do!
<3> JBlitzen: Have you ever read that study by those two professors? I'd like to see whether or not their calculations are easily decomposable or not.
<4> I have not
<4> Frankly I quickly lost interest
<4> It seemed intuitive, though
<5> good stuff
<5> now time for the shield, take that noidea!
<5> you and your "life" can shove it
<5> word
<5> wish fx came in high def though
<4> That movie was absolutely terrible
<5> i do
<5> what a ***y beast
<6> Hi
<6> I am inyrested in learning c++ is it a choice to start with.?
<4> I would recommend it, MrD
<4> Higher level languages are more common in the industry
<6> Which one would you recomend
<4> But they're easier to figure out if you have a background in a lower level language
<4> (C++)
<6> I have no backgroung what so ever..im trying to learn from the internet but it seems to be a very hard task
<6> Ive only got as faras the hello world and its been 16 hours
<0> MrD: Learning C++ from the Internet is like learning surgery by watching M*A*S*H
<6> In other words i got no hope then
<0> I recommend the book "Accelerated C++" by Koenig & Moo
<7> well M*A*S*H is obsolete, you gotta watch E.R.
<0> What OS are you on?
<6> windos
<6> xp
<0> Then get either...
<0> http://lab.msdn.microsoft.com/express/visualc/default.aspx
<0> Or...
<4> Takes a while to figure out what compilation is and what tools you need, MrD, don't let it bug you
<0> http://www.mingw.org/
<6> ok thank you for your time i have somestarters now
<0> If you are using Visual C++ 6.0 or anything with the word Borland in it, ditch it now.
<6> i have...one sec
<6> devcpp
<0> That works. It's just an IDE on top of MingW (second link above).
<6> ok thanks
<4> What internet tutorial or whatever have you been trying?
<0> http://cplus.about.com/od/beginnerctutorial/l/blcpptutorials.htm
<6> one more question...is there any chance of learning from a book
<0> That link is the only online tutorial I recommend.
<6> programmershaven
<0> MrD: Books are the preferred way of learning.
<8> I recommend the books here: http://rudbek.com/books.html
<0> Esp. the one I recommended above, "Accelerated C++"
<0> Yeah, and those.
<6> ok thanks again for all your help
<4> http://www.cplusplus.com/doc/tutorial/
<4> You might try that one
<4> But a book is usually better than a tutorial
<4> My only problem with The Shield is that each season is shorter than the average miniseries
<5> yeah
<4> Well, that and the fact that everyone in it is an immoral thief
<5> that's pretty much everyone
<4> But somehow that's not a deal breaker
<5> gotta love the "don't worry, you don't have to parent" commercials about v-chips and tv ratings prior to showing the shield
<5> hilarious
<4> I have a nail in my tire
<5> that was me
<5> i don't take too kindly to your kind around here
<4> Haha
<4> Nice
<4> Doesn't seem to be leaking significantly, though
<4> Think I have a few days to get it patched
<4> Need a new set of tires at some point, but not quite this soon
<3> There needs to be one of those silly online petitions for Accelerated C++ so #c++ can link to it because I can't think of anyone here who has not read it and believed its the best book you can read.
<3> So people can cop a feel for just how much people here seem to respect the book
<9> a petition for what?
<5> hmm, start a movie, or work on the silly bot
<9> bot?
<9> wife leave you?
<10> hello
<5> working on a bot in c++/cli for the "thrill" of using c++/cli
<10> oh, just got a quick question.
<9> ambir just ask
<9> peterhu what kind of bot?
<10> why do ppl use c if c++ is supposed to be better than c?
<10> sorry ^_^
<9> ambir because some people are stuck in the past
<5> a bot that will lurk in #c++/cli and ban jb automatically when he joins
<9> and some people don't know the difference between C and C++
<10> besides the oop, what other differences are there?
<5> this sounds like a question for google
<9> ambir: http://public.research.att.com/~bs/bs_faq.html
<10> i been checking google on this for days now, all i get is tutorials
<9> then you need to learn how to search ;)
<10> lol
<11> Can someone help me with this weird error?
<11> parser.cc:56: error: no matching function for call to string::string(const std::string&, const char*)
<11> parser.cc:10: note: candidates are: string::string(std::string&, const char*)
<11> hmm
<11> nm
<12> a string ctor that takes a non-const ref?
<11> yeah
<11> It's a functor.
<13> Run : it seems to be problem - the constness of the string
<9> Run - it looks like you're trying to p*** a const string where a non-const one is expected
<11> nm == nevermind
<9> ah
<14> is this a legal way to combine std::strings --> szSoundScape + " : Initialized"
Return to
#c++
or
Go to some related
logs:
#linux
#chatzone
#MissKitten
snoodle penis
serious53
#javascript
#chatzone
cackzilla
digest verification failed gentoo qt-x11
Katie Saylor
|
|