| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Comments:
<0> he doesn't have any reason other than he'd like to see Cheneyin court
<1> right
<1> that's really all it is.
<1> Whittington would have the right to take Cheney to civil court
<1> but I don't see any crime in this.
<1> even if Whittington died
<1> it was an accident
<1> and, at least at one point in this country, accidents weren't criminal
<0> well, if a gun's involved it can't be an accident according to some
<0> did you read Helen Thomas's screed
<1> no
<1> of course, with the way things are now
<1> if something goes wrong, the people hurt want to see someone go to jail
<1> if you were to accidentally run a red light, and kill someone in a car wreck
<1> you'd probably be on trial for involuntary manslaughter
<1> no one wants to accept there's risk in everything you do.
<1> Everytime you leave your house you might get killed in an accident.
<1> My climbing partner might drop me on the ground, it certainly shouldn't be a criminal matter.
<0> hmmm, I wonder what made me ban him permamently?
<0> and he PM'd me with the brilliang message "dork"
<0> maybe that was it
<0> err, s/brilliang/brilliant
<1> is 802.11n out yet?
<2> I have .11g and not even using it
<1> I love my wireless
<2> I don't have a laptop anymore so it's rather useless other than take away the ugly network cable
<1> yeah
<1> http://www.wifinetnews.com/archives/cat_80211n.html
<1> still not super fast
<1> 300mbps
<1> not hitting gigabit ethernet speeds yet
<1> bastards
<1> but, that may be fast enough to eliminate the wired network altogether.
<1> then, I can take my linux server, and throw it in a cabinet somewhere
<1> or out of the balcony
<1> out on
<1> damn it
<1> anyway
<1> I like hte idea of being able to have a computer running from somewhere with just a power cord attached to it.
<2> or without
<1> then it's not really running.
<1> I'm betting it'll be a long time before computers reach a point where they no longer require any power.
<2> well if you put it out on the balcony you can make it cell-powered
<1> oh, like solar panel?
<1> how would it run at night?
<2> yeah
<1> anyway, there are electrical outlets out there.
<2> it'd work off moon light 28 days a month
<2> actually, some people are starting to accommodate their house with solar panels and helos
<1> at some point I'm going to have to start getting rid of my old computers
<1> any idea how one disposes of old computers?
<2> apparently it's enough to provide power to an entire house
<1> in California now it's the law
<1> idiots
<1> drives up the cost of a new house by $20,000 on average
<2> no doubt
<2> it's for the best
<1> no it's not
<2> california is ridiculously polluted
<1> it makes already expensive houses much more expensive.
<1> And, California isn't ridiculously polluted
<1> and what pollution you get from power generation could be fixed by building more nuke plants
<1> but, even then
<1> a lot of Calis power comes from out of state anyway
<1> it doesn't do anything for industrial pollution
<1> or car pollution
<2> that's tur
<2> true
<2> now that I think of it, *we* provide most of the power in california
<2> there's actually no difference on the wage thing
<1> that's not true at all
<2> we earn less here but the cost of life is also much lower
<1> the only thing here more expensive is housing, really
<3> EwIck, how much does it cost to rent a dvd at blockbuster?
<1> but, I'm paying $650/mo for my apartment.
<3> last time i went to montreal, for a new release it was $10CDN i think :P
<1> I go to hollywood video, and it's $3.25
<2> $10 heh. you were on crack
<3> nah. it was a 2-disc miniseries (bundled together)
<2> it costs $4 at most, it's usually $/
<2> $3*
<3> hmm
<2> heh. sure. compare rocks and diamonds
<4> now wait just a damn minute, your talking about housing and movies... what about the important stuff in life?! what about a half rack of budweiser or a 1.75L of Jack Daniels?!
<3> or crack
<2> the only thing that's real expensive in canada are cigarettes
<3> lol
<4> you have a trade embargo with Cuba?
<2> no, a pack costs about $2, but they're sold $8
<1> I don'ot drink much bud anymore
<2> all taxes
<2> bud's not beer.
<1> a 6 pack of Sam Adams is only like $7
<1> and, California has wine
<1> mmmmmm
<1> I live near wine country
<1> only about 1.5 hours away.
<4> Oregon has wine too!
<4> I'm a big fan of Blackberry Merlot & Porter
<1> not nearly as much as CA
<2> I don't like wine from california
<2> it's not bad, but the french kick your *** at making wine big time
<1> pfft
<1> you do'nt know what you're talking about
<1> your selection of California wine is lacking up there
<1> you only have the stuff from the big places
<1> which is why you think that.
<1> it's like saying all American beer is crap based on what you can buy up there.
<0> we have a great brew-pub here.... very nice "American" beers
<5> woot, clean house
<5> having a dinner party, so need the place nice and clean
<5> good sign you're getting older: you have dinner parties instead of keggers
<5> sigh
<6> heh
<7> NoideaLT: can you tell me some *good* CA wines? Most CA wines I tried were pretty bad (including quite expensive ones).
<7> (Gee, the Californians know how to spoil a Merlot)
<2> we have a few dozens CS wines
<2> haven't tried them all, cause I got sick of it pretty quick
<2> but they were pretty bad indeed
<8> sorry to bother but i have a question. I have a template cl*** that will insert values into a hash_map.. It compiles on VC2003 but not in gcc 3.4
<8> template <cl*** T>
<8> cl*** C
<8> {
<8> private:
<8> hash_map<T,T2> vt;
<8> public:
<8> C() {};
<2> don't
<8> virtual ~C() {};
<8> void insert (T value, T value2) {vt[value] = value2;};
<2> just don't
<8> };
<2> stop
<8> int main(int argc, char* argv[])
<2> STOP
<8> {
<9> :)
<7> Note that hash_map implementations are non-portable extensions of the standard library. They are not compatible with the upcoming (C++0x) unordered containers and they likely aren't compatible with each other, either.
<0> didn't someone put together a TR1 hash_map
<7> There was at least one proposed for Boost, AFAIK.
<7> I have no idea whether it became part of the tr1 implementation in Boost.
<7> I don't recall any review.
<8> the code is here: http://84.90.96.199/error.cpp
<7> (But then ... would a tr1 implementation actually require a review?)
<0> me neither... btw, I have the shortest example of a problem to report for boost that I've ever seen
<0> it's a one line program
<10> TudoLhamu not a good idea to put using statements in header files
<8> i just want a template cl***<T> that will insert some values into a hash_map<T,T>
Return to
#c++
or
Go to some related
logs:
injection cyrox
#MissKitten
#linuxhelp
#mirc
#linux
#linux
ensoniq es1370 kubuntu
www.coolmp3.ro
awstats gzip-files
#AllNiteCafe
|
|