| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Comments:
<0> I have all but the first and the last... working through them though takes time :D
<1> AC++?
<0> acelerated C++
<0> accelerated even
<1> ahhhh
<2> vawjrwrk, Actually I began from a book named OO programming in C++ by Robert Lafore .. It was ma first book at programming
<3> i have a simple problem which i cannot find the solution to. if i have a char* string and i want to append an int to the end of it, how would i do it without using itoa
<4> You'd use std::string and stringstream in C++ world
<4> If you're after an algorithmic, libraryless approach then it's sailing rather too close to the "homework" wind for my tastes
<5> dumb_*** why would you be using char* for strings in the first place?
<3> i'm actually a java programmer who was given a choice to update some gay app written in C++, or hit tha road
<3> because this gay old code uses them everywhere
<5> maybe you should have hit the road
<5> 'updating' would include refactoring the design to use std::string properly, at least
<3> i just need quick and dirty
<3> lol
<3> i know
<5> so do it right
<2> I think if you are a java programmer, u should leave old C-strings alone !!
<5> or else it's going to be in a perpetual need for updating
<3> no time or money, i'm actually addnig an ace-tao bridge between 2 csu's because they are using the filesystem and it is costing them dearly
<2> sorry, didn't notice it's an old app
<5> if there's no time or money, you probably should leave it alone
<3> lol
<3> i just want to append an int to a char*
<3> that's all lol
<5> having a java programmer run wild with antique C++ isn't going to be good for business, and will probably cost more than spending the money now to do it right to begin with
<3> eh, who cares
<6> Maybe you should start by learning the language.
<6> too
<3> i can get it done, i don't give a **** if it breaks 3 months from now
<5> messing with char* as string is more of a C thing, maybe you'd have more luck in #C
<6> Your nick pretty much describres your personality.
<3> lol
<3> yes
<3> i agree 100%
<5> yet somehow you feel you deserve some kind of respect
<3> what the **** are you talking about
<5> exactly
<3> i just want to get this goddamn piece of gay code written
<7> then pay someone to write it
<3> lol
<3> nah that's my job
<3> boy you guys are no ****ing help
<7> you can outsource
<5> then maybe you should learn how to do your job
<5> not sure how you got hired
<6> well seems like you don't know how to do your job.
<3> because i can b.s. pretty good
<5> i'm sure your boss would love to hear that
<7> yeah and that's the problem, people like me can't get jobs because of people like you
<8> dumb_*** what ***urance do you have that there is sufficient "room" to do the append?
<5> where do you work, at aactech.com ?
<3> yep
<3> 63.174.92.41
<6> You've got to be kidding me.
<7> rdragon: now why would you want to look that up ;)
<3> want a job?
<3> we hire out the ***
<4> Just don't feed the trolls
<5> not if I have to work with you
<6> They hired a complete idiot to write defense systems?
<5> how much do you make, dumb_*** ?
<8> and there's never enough money in doing defense systems
<7> he'll get thrown in jail for sabatoge when he writes some code that has obvious buffer overflows and such
<6> Now I know why our systems break all the time.
<5> if his employer was smart, there should be logs being produced of his irc activity here
<8> I email them to his employer
<9> haha
<6> so dumb_*** what's your name again?
<6> heh
<5> heh
<6> hehe
<5> hah
<5> was waiting for that
<6> That was quite funny.
<5> or maybe he got killed, heh
<9> own3d
<7> clsk: his employer only has 16 ips, it should be easy to find who it was if you mailed logs
<9> though his employer should be pretty incompetent too, if they let someone like this get hired?
<0> mmm http://aactech.com/departments.htm
<0> what the hell
<7> that's not the domain registered with ARIN
<7> wtf they do defense signal processing and sell golf shirts
<6> heh
<10> Asmodee`, that's common for companies to sell merchandise with their logo on it
<10> same thing happens at the microsoft company store
<7> i guess im not one for corporate spirit or whatever ;P
<11> I have recently been thinking about the fundamental paradox of our society
<11> Why are stupid people generally more successful than intelligent people?
<8> I don't think that's true
<11> I said generally, not always
<11> But whats your argument vawjrwrk?
<5> I think there's a huge bias, in that there's an overwhelming number of stupid people, compared to intelligent
<8> argument against a false statement?
<11> Argument for proving it false
<11> See rdragon agrees with me, even though he lives in the middle east :D
<5> ...what?
<8> hey, it's YOUR proposition...all you've said is that it's true
<5> I don't agree with you, and I don't live in the middle east
<10> florida is kinda like the middle east
<5> virginia is more middle-east than FL
<10> negative
<5> FL is south-east
<11> Hmm... see rdragon's point supports me.
<8> what??
<11> There are more stupid people than intelligent, thus they are outnumbered.
<11> Like I am right now
<5> outnumbered has nothing to do with it
<10> virginia is more like Renaissance Firenze, beeotch
<8> your ability to formulate a clear argument is underwhelming
<10> a beacon unto the world for all of mankind's achievements
<5> if you want to say that there are more sucessful stupid people than sucessful intelligent people, THEN the numbers mean something
<11> Lets start with cl***ification.
<5> you said that in general, stupid people are more sucessful than intelligent people... and you haven't supported it with anything yet
<11> Stupid people: salesmen, MBA types, lawyers, advertisement agents, accountants.
<11> In decreasing order of stupidity.
<8> it's far eaiser to be a success at being stupid
<5> those are professions, that has nothing to do with stupidity
<8> IRR^ that I will argue with
<5> stupidity is on an individual level
<11> Intelligent people: IT Professionals, engineers, scientists
<8> also not demonstrated
<11> Add politician to stupid people list
<8> look at dumb_***
<5> I know lots of 'IT professionals' that are complete idiots - we just saw one come through here a few minutes ago
<11> Its an observational argument, not a formal one.
<5> IRR^ you're generalizing individual intelligence based on their profession
<11> Afterall, its a paradox that I observe
<8> you ought to refine your observatonal techniques
<5> IRR^ you might have an argument, but this is not it
<8> perhaps it would help if you told us your definition of "stupid"
<11> The reason why I can attach stupidity with those professions is that people who are not good in sience or maths become one of those.
<5> where is your evidence?
<8> IRR^ I disagree again
<8> my father was an accountant, and FAR brighter than either of us, likely
<11> stupid == unable to correctly manage complexity
<5> you can't make a claim without support - lets see some
<11> vawjrwrk I am talking of correlations not exact mappings.
<11> Look. When I think, I don't use formal methods. I observe and I think.
<11> And I make conclusions regarding what I see.
<5> well, what have you seen?
<9> peterhuhu you there?
<9> what's the name of the french restaurant you mentioned earlier, in VA?
<11> I see stupid people become top executives, while smart ones aren't as successful.
<5> what have you seen, and what is your justification for the conclusions that you've drawn ?
<11> rdragon I just told you
<9> IRR^ wtf are you talking about
<9> that sort of attitude won't get you far
<5> IRR^ that doesn't constitude a generalization that stupid people are more successful than smart ones
<5> te
Return to
#c++
or
Go to some related
logs:
#chatzone
ventrilo 2.1 g15 addon
cum se da flood din putty
dudak yala
weezil mirc
shakespeare snudge -bootsie
#php
7 Beyler
anti-establishment film
#AllNiteCafe
|
|