| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Comments:
<0> the entire server crashes
<1> then maybe they should fix their ****
<0> there are days when they have no dhcp and no internet
<0> until then, they asked me to do this
<1> weird
<0> so i just asked you if any of you know
<0> how to do it
<1> even still, who cares about ipx??
<2> if they want it they will have to manually install ipx
<2> move on
<1> just use tcp...
<0> i've seen programs that install ipx automaticaly
<0> OMG
<1> they should have a secondary backup dhcp server, anyway
<0> it doesn't matter that ipx ****s, is old and so on
<2> if you insist on doing idiotic things...
<1> if there is no dhcp server all windows xp machines will pick an automatic private ip address, so you can still communicate
<3> [14:02.34] <2> wins is how names get resolved too
<3> Haha
<1> isn't it netbios?
<1> or both, or something
<3> ....
<1> *shrug*
<3> And then you say IPX is old
<3> Heh
<2> and ?
<3> Active Directory, DNS?
<2> ah yeah if the dhcp server c laps out dns wont work
<4> http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/war/wwtwo/colonies_colonials_01.shtml
<5> what is the use of the keyword : interface ?
<1> there is no such keyword in C++
<5> i havew it as a keyoword in vc++
<1> no, it's just highlighting it
<1> because it's a keyword in C++/CLI
<3> It'd a define for struct, Guns|n|r0s3s
<3> And it's not from C++/CLI
<5> what is that for ?
<3> It's most likely higlighted in VC++ 6 as well
<1> it's not?
<1> hmm
<3> Comes from type libs
<6> mrashe, it won't
<6> __iterface is the attributed ATL keyword
<6> and that was in 7
<6> interface that is
<3> I have interface in blue
<5> what is the possible use of that ?
<3> So unless I have a very special mighty magic version of VC++..
<6> in 2003?
<3> (and I'm not talking about the ATL keyword anyway, I said typelib)
<3> You know those things where you define COM objects
<3> The interface keyword is used
<6> sure, in an .idl file
<6> not in c++ file
<3> Yeah, that
<6> completely different language
<3> Doesn't matter, I still get it in blue in .cpp
<6> which version?
<3> At least 7.1, and I'm pretty sure 6 did as well
<5> in 2005 too
<6> in 2005, interface is a C++/CLI keyword
<6> context sensative keyword
<6> yeah, silly editor
<6> it shouldn't color it
<5> lol
<3> (people never believe me)
<1> hey peterhu
<6> int interface; highlights with /clr too
<6> boo
<6> the compiler doesn't treat it as a keyword, why do you intellisense
<6> hey rd
<3> Because intellisense suxorz
<3> Visual ***ist++
<6> well, it looks like C#'s editor fixed "value"
<6> i think
<3> But VA makes it blue anyway
<3> Because of the #define or whatever in some win32 header
<6> yep they did
<6> i'm sure there's a bug about interface somewhere, but they were too busy to get to it because of C++/CLI
<6> anyway, i'm off to work
<3> Half the IDE is a bug
<6> heh, value works fine in c++
<6> colors as keyword as "value struct"
<6> but does not color for "int value"
<6> silly intellisense, syntax coloring is for kids
<1> heh
<7> what is wrong is my socket() returns -1 ?
<7> what is wrong IFy socket() returns -1 ?
<7> darn
<7> what is wrong IF my socket() returns -1 ?
<4> woohoo
<7> woo?
<4> hoo
<7> oook
<7> so what do you think?
<4> peterhu
<7> socket() returns -1
<8> IDE = xemacs
<8> bwahahaha
<8> random quote of the day
<4> Hey Quantum`` how is the fracture coming along?
<8> ill know tomorrow
<8> then I get the results of the scanner
<4> Don't skip exams
<8> i hope not
<8> ill be in ****
<8> and I wont get to prove NP-completeness of knapsack problems
<8> who would want to miss that?
<4> hehe..
<8> who, I ask, who??
<4> academic greed
<4> Umm.. I would
<8> everyone would
<1> test
<9> FAILURE
<1> :(
<10> :(
<8> errno = -6666 // -6666 rd is not hetero
<1> :/
<4> See what a little QA can do to your reputation
<8> ugh complexity theory isnt a pick nick
<4> Which is why its called complexity theory.
<4> It could very well be called simplicity theory, but that would have had paradoxical connotations.
<8> I wonder how dead a person is when he finds P = NP
<8> I give him a life expectancy of about 1 week
<4> I think he doesn't give a hoot about it
<4> His professor nudged him into it, and he can't do anything else now other than garbage collector man.
<8> are you kidding me?
<4> No
<8> you do know what it would mean to prove it?
<4> How else would you explain books like a = b
<8> what?
<4> Actually I kind of forget. What does it mean to prove P = NP?
<8> you know what I mean by P and NP?
<4> Ok well, NP = an algo that can be solved in polynomial time by a non deterministic turing machine
<4> and P can be solved in Polynomial time by a deterministic machine right?
<8> yes
<8> now
<8> if you prove
<8> that all NP problems are in the cl*** of P problems
<4> I don't think there is a point
<8> you have found a way to solve NP (completeness) in P time
<8> right?
<4> I'll rather try make a nd turing machine then prove that
<8> no no
<8> listen!
<8> if you can crack solving on NP complete problem in P time
<8> you solved all NP problems in P time
<8> right?
Return to
#c++
or
Go to some related
logs:
#linux
#linux
#javascript
apt-remove --purge
#c++
#c
kendle of kittens
zelko samrdzic
#linux
cum sa dai flood pe ip
|
|