| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Comments:
<0> heh
<1> hello i am looking for algorithm of printing infix with brackets expression tree
<2> vote high! I better not be seeing a 1
<0> there's an actual blog post i found by a microsoft employee, though i don't think he was on the VC++ team, exclaiming with great glee, about the for each syntax without /clr on standard containers
<2> it's also the zaniest bug ever, so demands high votes just for that
<0> it's a feature
<0> the bug is that it still builds with /Za
<3> There's a small, evil kernel in me that kinda want that kinky for each thing in the standard.
<2> it's a nice idea, but it's not in the standard. it shouldn't build, eof
<0> someone on freenode mentioned it'll be in the next standard, or is being considered
<2> we've enough of Microsofts embrace and extend without them doing it to C++
<0> considering i only check out TR1 information, i'm not paying that much attention
<4> I'm not brainwashed, but I've only been here 2 years, I figure I have another 3 or 4 left in me and then I'll head back down to the Portland area or somewhere else
<5> I've often thought that HLLs with restricted (range) types should have a forall type syntax.... no implication of order, just that they'd all be done
<0> working for microsoft or some other company?
<4> MS
<0> which group?
<5> I've thought that since I worked with Pascal subranges types
<2> vawjrwrk - Agreed, but kind of implies a language level threading/parallel execution model
<0> please don't say avalon or vb
<0> those are the two teams i can't stand
<3> (JavaScript)
<6> haha
<1> can you help me wiht the algorithm
<7> if I have a base cl*** with a pure virtual method.. and I have a deriving cl*** overriding this method.. right.. but i then have another cl*** deriving from the deriving cl***.. will I have to override the pure virtual AGAIN or is it ok since It is already overridden in the parent cl*** ?
<4> MBS, was worked on V1 and V2 of their new Point of Sale system and am now working on Small Business Online Services doing the commerce/merchant services for Office Live
<8> Stop saying that Solamente, you make me horny
<3> heh
<0> one of the most fustraiting meetings i ever had was with the avalon team
<0> "what, you mean C++ isn't exactly like C#?!"
<0> -i
<0> fustrating
<5> Asriel no, it just wouldn't guarantee ordering....low -> high or high -> low, OR parallel
<2> then what advantage does the syntax provide?
<8> The only good use of C# is on a music sheet
<2> other than the metadata of the programmer saying "I don't care what order you do this in"?
<7> anyone know? :)
<5> Antrix, once it's defined, it's defined, you CAN overrride it again if you wish
<0> oh, the hacks i had to do for the first visual studio "support" for vista in a WinHEC release
<0> i never felt so dirty
<4> MrAshe I just code in what I'm told to use, I'm too low on the totem pole to make a decision like what language to use
<4> :)
<8> Get another job then
<6> yea seriously
<4> I like what I'm doing right now, plus I like my team members
<6> whatever
<8> That's like my boss few weeks ago telling me "why don't we do this new service in java?"
<7> thats what i thought.. but i get something like "cannot allocate an object of type 'x', because the following virtual functions are abstract: ..
<4> everyone is intelligent and works hard, I don't have to carry someone else who is lazy
<8> And I told him "well, **** you?"
<8> And he said "oh ok"
<8> And so it was not java
<7> but they are already overridden in the parent
<0> can the parent type be instantiated?
<5> I'd like this a lot better if there were reasonable / coherent information availalbe about Team System
<9> i need a "binary search tree" code example ?
<0> wilm, yeah, that's what i miss most about working at microsoft
<6> Antrix: there's no problem, as vawjr said, you don't HAVE to override, since it's already definied, but you CAN if you want to
<0> people got me better than anywhere else i've worked
<10> xmmd are you asking if you need one?
<7> ok :) - but then why do I get this error> it doesnt make sense
<0> google likely has thousands of BST examples, let alone wikipedia
<2> Antrix - Post your code on the site in the top
<8> C1002: it doesn't make sense
<2> ic
<8> That'd be a good one
<4> I spent 5 years working for a company in Portland, it was horrible, I now hear people at work complain about MS and I'm like you should try working at other companies in the real world
<6> Antrix: paste code + errors at www.rafb.net/paste
<8> (next to C1003: you ****)
<10> xmmd not to mention examples on how to properly form interrogative sentences
<0> mrashe, we did joke about the FU switch
<6> interrogative
<4> I know some companies have strong people, but it's amazing how many lazy developers there are in this world
<5> xmmd what for, std::set and std::map are in the library
<0> we always thought it was funny that a .NET switch made sense to call FU
<6> it's amazing how many lazy people there are in this world, fullstop.
<6> vawjrwrk: likely it's for school
<5> then I won't help him/her
<8> peterhu: which one?
<0> that's a safe bet
<6> hoho
<0> FU = force using
<0> FI equiv for .NET ***emblies
<4> anyways, it's been fun, I have to go clean the garage today before my wife kills me (she's been bugging me for months). Have fun all
<0> (compiler switch, sorry)
<8> I understood compiler switch in the first place anyway
<7> LOL, now it suddenly compiles - i didnt even change anything!
<6> WOW
<0> magic
<6> by pure MAGIC??
<8> Antrix: now we're on tuesday, 3 minutes ago not
<7> yeah... pure magic
<8> Moon phases, don't forget, moon phases
<0> pfft you crazy .bes
<0> it's monday
<0> 2 hours until prison break season finale
<0> beeotch
<6> it is?
<8> Not my fault if you're always slower
<6> oh ****
<7> i think there is a g++ gnome making porridge in my compiler & linker
<0> i need to call my wife and ask her to set the DVR because i forgot
<6> yes, a very likely scenario
<11> can anyone help me with a registry thing
<1> hello i am looking for algorithm of printing infix with brackets expression tree
<6> aren't DVR's remote-accessible nowadays?
<0> do we have to keep a straight face, xan2?
<0> cowmoo, not my piece of **** scientific atlanta
<6> wtf is scientific atlanta
<6> doesn't sound like Tivo, which means suxx0rz
<0> a DVR + cablebox combo many different cable companies use
<6> pffft
<11> what do u mean
<6> going for the cheap route always screws you in the end
<0> it saves 1080i, so that's all i care about
<6> Xan2: see channel topic
<0> but the interface is horrible, and the ability to reliably record a seasons worth of new shows is lacking
<6> Tivo
<8> 720p > 1080i
<0> tivo + hd + satellite = bling
<0> my tv doesn't do 720p
<0> nor does anyone really broadcast in it
<6> even the missus will thank you for getting tivo
<6> everybody wins
<2> tivo++
<6> Asriel: do they have tivo in the UK?
<2> yup
<2> used to have one at work (for watching Countdown)
<6> haha Countdown
<2> have a tivo equivilent here, via Sky (Sky+)
<6> yea I thought the only game in town was Sky
<6> so it's not Tivo then is it?
<2> but lots of non Tivo PVRs
<2> no, there were (are?) real Tivos
<6> oh ok
<2> the one we had at the office was a real, honest Tivo. With the strange TV guy sliding down a weird tube
<7> ... now its back, definately some gnome action going on
<6> hahah
<6> Antrix: www.rafb.net/paste, kthxbye
<0> i'm tempted to build a myth box, but i'm curious how well it would work on a, sigh, adelphia cable account
<6> what does the cable provider matter?
<0> signal encryption?
<6> ohh
<0> i think, but i'd have to check, that your mythbox can talk to certain cable box makes, but i'm not sure
<0> i haven't done much research into the matter
<6> aye
<6> ok, time to start work on the last school ***ignment of my life
Return to
#c++
or
Go to some related
logs:
weather Macedonija
#chatzone
#c++
DINJA BOY
69.50.167.10
protain shake
Copying of text from this document is not allowed pdftohtml
#AllNiteCafe
i'm being packeted
#squid
|
|