| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Comments:
<0> I'd like to complain about people who write "damn" when they mean "damned"
<0> think of the children, someone
<1> damn = correct
<0> what!
<0> it's completely broken
<1> god damn it
<1> it isn't
<0> that's fine
<0> as a verb
<1> so is damn straight
<0> but as an adjective?
<0> "you are a damn person" vs "you are a damned person"
<0> kthx
<1> i wish someone would damn you straight
<0> :'(
<0> k back to study
<1> damn fine idea
<0> omg stop
<1> i really couldn't give a damn
<0> tha's fine, noun there
<0> hurhur
<1> damn you to h e double hockey sticks
<1> you're a damn fool
<0> kdie
<1> that's a damn shame
<2> peterhu: how do you pronounce suit -- "sjut", or "swit" as someone told me?
<3> soot
<3> soooot
<0> slut
<1> sooooooooooooooooooooooooooot
<1> sjut?
<1> how is that even pronounced?
<3> sjuuuut
<1> heh
<0> lol rd
<1> jesus' ressurection the "greatest leap in history", as described by the pope
<1> leap of what?
<4> leap of faith, clearly :)
<1> leap of outlandish mythology to fact?
<4> well, come on now
<4> you read romeo and juliet.
<4> poisons existed back then that made someone appear to be dead
<4> jesus was just a good magician, that's all
<1> heh
<4> and his friends were excellent BSers
<1> that's my bet
<4> i heard there's a gospel according to Judas
<4> making him out to be a friendly sort of guy
<1> christians, muslims, jews, mormons, scientologists
<1> all in the same boat
<1> appearly people will believe anything
<4> well
<4> sometimes it's useful to believe in -something-
<4> as a stress reducer..
<1> yeah i think that gospel is in DC actually
<4> sort of lifts obligations off of your shoulders
<4> if it's "God's will" that something happened... hard to blame yourself and get all depressed about it, isn't it? :)
<4> seriously.
<4> I think that's one useful part about religion
<1> would be nice to be able to commit to that
<4> the regular get-your-***-to-church thing isn't bad for the community, either... or for people's individual mental health
<4> being around people at least once a week is good for us
<1> i disagree
<4> !@#%!
<1> people are the reason church ****s
<4> as human beings we crave social interaction!
<4> it sharpens our minds
<1> perhaps if there were people worth being around
<4> yea I guess churches are like everything else
<4> you gotta shop around to find one that doesn't ****
<1> christ, they didn't stop you from participating in the easter egg hunt, why are you wearing rainbow colored leis to shout "LOOK AT US, WE'RE GAY PARENTS!"
<4> hahaha
<1> i don't understand political people
<4> personally I think that's sick and retarded
<4> same boat as putting "**** me" tshirts on toddlers as a joke
<4> i don't condone the exploitation of kids
<1> well, that's pretty wrong
<1> a "**** YOU" t-shirt would be appropriate
<4> hahah
<4> well okay
<4> you get the idea tho :)
<1> nothing wrong with the word ****
<5> hi - please how do i access given position in a char * declaration? i am trying to extract just the file name from a complete Path+File configuration
<4> heh
<6> given position? a char or a part of the string?
<5> so i'm going backwards, like: (for i=str_len; i>0; i--) (if (*my_name[i]=="\") break);
<5> yes
<4> he just wants to add an offset to a char*
<5> will that work:
<4> or not :
<4> :D
<6> :P
<6> yes, it will work
<5> after i find the value of "i", i intend to do this:
<4> well, you do have a typo, Spades
<2> "\" not terminated
<6> but what's that syntax?
<4> you're comparing to "\" ... which is a string
<4> you want to compare to the backslash _character_
<4> (use single quotes)
<6> and as melfar said the string is not terminated
<5> (for j=i; j<=str_len; j++) (*no_path[j-i]=*my_name[i]);
<6> cuz you're escaping "
<5> ok - will change that
<4> not only that... you're dereferencing an array *and* you're using array index[] operator at the same time
<4> that's no good man :)
<1> this sounds like a job for...string::rfind!
<4> get back to reading your C++ book
<4> hehe
<5> ok can you please correct it for me?
<4> no.
<5> i do not have one
<5> ok thank you
<4> what do I look like, your slave? :)
<5> * Topic is 'C++ And Related Development -- Just ask!, please post code at website ( www.noidea128.org )'
<5> *
<5> i thought people come here for questions
<5> anyway
<4> yeah. I told you what to fix didn't I? :)
<4> what, you want me to spoon feed you too?
<5> * Added Swish!*@* to ignore list you're not very helpful, sorry
<6> lol
<1> hahaha
<4> well, I Never!
<5> :}
<4> heh
<1> we need to start #c++.for.those.that.already.know.c++
<4> heh!
<7> whats the easiest way to build a simple windows form in dev-c++?
<1> wouldn't have the foggiest
<4> the discussions would be more fun, but much more pedantic
<4> and highly tecnical. I dunno. :)
<7> ive been looking into minggw
<1> i'd look into visual c++ 2005 express
<1> but that's just me
<7> i might just do that
<6> vc 2005 express lacks the resource editor
<6> but... same with dev-c++
<1> um
<1> the native resource editor?
<6> yup
<1> who needs it
<8> hmm
<6> :)
<8> peterhu, whats the biggest difference between the express and normal version?
<6> free?
<6> that's a big difference :D
<1> with higher SKU's, PSDK/ATL/MFC come with it
<1> higher SKU's support PGO (profile guided optimizations)
<1> and have the dialog editor, and friends
Return to
#c++
or
Go to some related
logs:
#c++
palmiros
ndiswrapper dwl-g650 b5
crystyxxl
#teens
#linux
swing expandbar
#AllNiteCafe
#javascript
FSCTL_GET_RETRIEVAL_POINTERS unix
|
|