| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Comments:
<0> well, a presumed female
<1> yeah, it is
<2> a female that wasnt always a female?
<2> wierd...
<2> windoze only boots if the cd is in the tray
<1> what cd?
<2> otherwise it says NTLDR is missing
<2> the windoze cd
<1> the setup cd?
<2> yup
<1> i guess you screwed something up then ;)
<3> I had a machine do that before
<3> it might have had something to do with windows was not installed on C:
<3> it did it right from the start
<2> well there is one HDD in it with a half wrecked windoze on it
<2> i dont know how to remove the bootsector
<3> then repartition and install something good :)
<1> try running fixboot or whatever that tool is
<1> chkdsk /fixmbr ?
<1> somthing like that.
<2> that master boot record
<2> fixmbr is a command alone
<2> i had to use it a short while ago
<1> fixboot, then
<2> but my raptor works very well
<2> my maxtor too, exept for the windoze on it
<2> i cant format it because of the data on it
<1> http://www.computerhope.com/issues/ch000465.htm
<1> http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=314057
<2> can i get windoze or my pc to not try to boot from this disk at all?
<3> change the settings in your BIOS
<2> that wont let me
<3> must be a pretty cheap BIOS
<2> at least not to access it and not boot from it
<3> have you tried reinstalling?
<2> nope
<2> because i dont want windoze on it
<2> its a spare data disk
<3> so you have andother HDD you want it to boot from instead?
<2> i am booting from it now
<2> the main one is a Raptor
<2> and i have 180 gig next to it
<2> but i want to use them as the slow disks
<2> cause my raptor is just 74 gig
<2> and i turned off VM too
<2> at least on the raptor
<4> heh
<4> there are a few things you might need to do.
<1> yeah my two raptors fly pretty nicely
<4> #1: make all partitions on the maxtor NON-ACTIVE
<4> ie, non-boot.
<4> that'll prolly fix it actually
<2> ah
<4> but then you need to make sure the raptor's partition is also marked ACTIVE :)
<2> and can you tell me how to do so?
<4> erm
<2> no?
<4> do you know how to make a Bart's PE cd?
<3> fdisk should be able to set it up
<4> could be yea
<4> you could try downloading a DOS boot floppy from www.bootdisk.com or .org or whatever that site is :)
<2> right then i have to hunt down a floppy drive and some cabling
<2> and another PSU
<2> i dont even recall how a floppy drive looks like....
<3> poor kids
<4> hehe
<2> cant be the age
<4> make sure to cable it right or it won't start up ;)
<4> (pin 1 and all that)
<2> well not my age at least
<2> i have a cute 200 watt psu somewhere
<2> pretty much 1/5 of a normal one
<4> you gotta be careful with PSUs.
<4> if they're not connected to a motherboard you could fry them by turning them on with no load.
<2> there is some load
<4> :]
<2> it usualy runs at 5v and 12v
<2> and it uses the 5vsb too
<2> and you dont need to tell me what to do with the green wire :)
<4> :D
<3> ground in PCs is usually black
<4> yea that's an old trick for ATX psus
<4> short the green and black wires and it powers on :)
<2> WHAT DID I JUST TELL YOU!?!?!
<4> hehe
<2> :)
<4> it was for cn28h's benefit ;)
<4> (or anyone else
<3> bad ;P and I just got my first machine that's not a PC, too haha
<0> what is it?
<3> SPARC64
<4> cool. :)
<3> indeed
<3> I got it used, I wouldn't have the cash for that new haha
<3> itsol for arund $18k in 1998
<3> time for cl***
<3> later all
<5> Off to office
<6> hy. I know it is a little off topic, but can anyone tell me the movement equation of a circular rotation?
<1> movement equation?
<6> yeah... the respective x,y (and z) coordinates after T elapsed seconds....
<6> i dunno... how do you call them in English?
<1> so you mean how to calculate the position x2,y2 after rotating x,y around point xo,yo some number of degrees
<2> wow windoze 2k is incomplete
<2> cant tell me how to make a boot floppy
<6> yeah... actually yes, because I can calculate the number of degrees from the radius, and the speed
<1> so you just need to know how to rotate a point
<1> aroudn the origin
<6> yea
<1> since you should translate the origin of rotation to 0,0, do the rotation, then translate back
<6> okay... that works for a circle... but actually i have an ellipsoid...
<6> ellipsoid-shaped orbit
<1> hm
<6> i'd need something like x = x0 + t^2*(?????) + t*(????) respectively for y
<6> that's maths.... :(
<6> any channel where i can get help with math related stuff?
<7> #math perhaps?
<8> calling a constructor in the code of a function of that cl*** is a valid thing to do ?
<9> huh?
<9> how do you plan on calling the constructor?
<9> how did you call the function?
<8> i have a default constructor with no parameters, and in a constructor with parameters, i want to call the first constructor
<10> You can't.
<8> oh..
<9> you _can_
<10> you can ... if you want to construct another object.
<8> i want to initialize that object
<9> or call placement new with this
<9> ewwwww
<10> Or if you want to go the UB route and do a placement new.
<9> cristi8 make a function that they both call
<8> ..ok.. thanks..
<10> Or create a private base cl*** that implements common behaviour of both ctors.
<10> (IMHO, the private base would be a cleaner approach than the additional initialization function)
<9> for a default and one other constructor??
<10> Yes.
<9> wow
<9> I wouldn't have considered that one
<8> i have two alternatives of using the cl***: 1) using the default constr. and the call set_var1(var);... OR: 2) calling the constructor with the "var" parameter
<9> can you use the object if set_var(var) has NOT been called?
<8> not really.. no
<9> then there IS no default object
<10> That resembles the recent shmem thread so much ...
<8> there are about 5 vars to set.. should i make only ONE constructor with all 5 parameters ?
<9> if you need them all, yes
<10> If you need all five of them to create a fully functional object then definitely yes.
<9> doesn't need to be FULLY functional, but must be functional across all method calls I offer fstream as an example
<9> you cannot USE it until it's been opened, but if you try at least it doesn't blow up
<10> I really dislike fstream's not-fully-operational state.
<8> ok.. i'm gone coding now.. thanks for advices
<9> I think it was a mistake, but given how strongly the C freaks were pushing "same capabilities as C files" I thnk we got off pretty clean
Return to
#c++
or
Go to some related
logs:
xmlparse.js
sexwithme
killmbr recover
Nice Frms Ass
#AllNiteCafe
zejziet tan nisa
netcat unwanted connection refused
1trabzon
#asm
#php
|
|