@# Quotes DB     useful, funny, interesting





Google
 
Web www.quotesdb.info
Undernet  |  EFnet  |  Quakenet  |  Freenode  |  Dalnet  |  Ircnet  |  Galaxynet
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15



Comments:

<0> hehe
<0> maybe you have the breakpoint wrong?
<0> i set it as &vec._Mylast
<1> I set it as vec._Mylast (without the &)
<1> Not sure why its address would change
<0> no
<0> the breakpoint is on the address
<0> that says 'when the data at this address changes...'
<2> function a() { $i=2;}; function b() { echo $i;} .. is there any other way to get the value of $i to b() without using globals, parameter p***ing?
<1> Yes, so adding a & makes no sense
<0> that doesn't look like C++, Rosse`
<1> + it works for the push_back
<1> But I can add a & if that makes you happy
<0> do it ;)
<1> With the & I get no breakpoint at all, not even for the push_back
<0> hm, ok



<0> well
<1> Exactly, time for ***
<0> something must be stepping on the memory of that singleton, or something
<0> recompile all?
<3> Rosse` make it function b($i)
<4> do any of the list types have a function built into it where it can search the list, add if its not found, or return the position if it is found?
<0> holospoof - what does your book say?
<0> it would likely return an iterator, not the 'position'
<4> there are no operations for this.. i need to make my own
<0> you're wrong
<3> What list type are you using?
<0> and what do you mean by 'any' of the list types - how many are there?
<4> im not using any yet, im looking for the best one.. deque, list, vector.. are the 3 im looking at right now
<0> well there's std::find()
<0> and some have a member function .find()
<0> of course, your book says that
<4> to use with a list?
<4> let me check again
<0> it should be under "searching"
<4> with list there isnt a .find but there is a sort and unique function combo that will work gr8, thanks
<0> if there's not a .find(), then use find()
<0> stop dreaming up weird solutions, it's very straightforward
<4> so c++ sets would actually work best
<4> kthx
<5> actually
<5> i work best
<5> XD
<0> when did I say anything about sets? geez
<6> IMO we should add either specializations to the <algorithm> collection for those containers than can do it, or we should add "member methods" to all the containers
<4> im reading my book dawg.. chill out
<6> rdragon you don't have to say anything, all the newbies find the best stuff all by themselves
<0> vawjrwrk yeah I was wondering why find() simply wasn't specialized
<4> find is included in set
<6> yes, we know
<4> along with a bunch of other things for what i need
<0> why did you switch from a list to a set?
<6> likely because he likes "insert"
<0> what book are you working from, anyway?
<0> The White House also released the 2005 tax return filed by Vice President **** Cheney and his wife, Lynne. According to the return, the Cheneys have overpaid their taxes this year and are entitled to a refund of about $1.9 million.
<4> instead of adding multiple items to a list and counting how many there are, i'd just keep track of them with 1 entry in a set
<4> and increment an integer type
<0> why not use a map?
<6> holospoof what exactly are you trying to do?
<7> http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,191819,00.html
<7> seriously
<7> why don't we just run this country over already?
<4> vawjrwrk im finding the color that appears most often in a range of pixels
<0> why?
<4> cuz i can?
<4> i dunno because i am?
<4> lol
<0> what use is that informatin?
<1> How histogram-ish
<0> apparently you can't :)
<4> i can too, im just finding the most efficient way cuz it happends over and over again
<4> its for a graphics filter im creating
<7> why would you want to filter graphics?
<0> to find quarters in pictures of sand
<7> hmmmm, yeah, maybe.
<4> its for a top secret military highlighting project!
<0> sorry you're working on it, then



<4> text recognition in graphics to filter out words such as, UFO
<4> *** scandal
<4> and fellatio
<7> does that appear in the pictures a lot?
<7> don't they normally put the caption outside of the picture?
<4> these pictures are scanned document pages with text only, after i recognize the lines, i select their pixels and using font recognition i have to convert the text to a string and compare against a set of "bad words"
<7> so, why not use software taht's already written to strip text from images?
<4> making sure i black out all of the sentence/paragraph that should not be read by civilians
<4> what would be the fun in that?
<0> yeah, productivity != fun
<7> you'd learn to use a library
<4> you know how to government is, they dont care about money
<4> also, they dont want someone they dont trust coding **** for them
<0> but they don't mind people coding ****
<0> as long as they're trusted
<8> yeah, cause there are tons of trojans and back doors in font regognition software ....
<4> you got it
<7> who writes their compilers?
<4> "skepticism is the door to eternal ignorance"
<7> and their standard C and C++ libraries?
<9> Noidea: because it's not doable. At least not by the US alone.
<4> how should i know
<7> and their operating systems?
<8> heh
<7> the US could run over Iran
<0> holospoof well then how can you trust all that code?
<9> not right now
<7> I mean, it might require pulling resources from elsewhere
<0> heck, who manufactures the hardware?
<4> im not the one whos trusting
<4> im just coding for cash
<7> but, there's not much question, the US would run them down pretty quick
<9> the US doesn't even have full control of Iraq.
<4> govt check, brother
<0> and then what?
<7> the question is, what would happen after that.
<4> so lets talk about maps
<9> chaos
<0> no, lets read about maps
<7> ahh, clsk, that's not what I'm saying
<9> Iran has a better military force than Iraq did.
<9> afaik
<7> to disable their nuclear abilities
<7> the US doesn't need to occupy Iran necessarily
<7> just run them over
<9> It's not that easy.
<9> some of their nuclear facilities are very deep underground
<7> that wouldn't matter
<7> if we invade
<8> there is also the UN to deal with
<9> It wouldn't?
<7> I'm not saying just bomb them from the air
<9> invading iran would not be an easy task.
<9> not possible at the moment with all the soldiers here in iraq
<0> select the troops, Ctrl-F1, right click on their base
<9> plus afghanistan
<8> it would be if other countries gave support.
<9> and other conflicts
<7> the US could certainly invade Iran, trounce them in combat, destroy their military, overthrow their government, disable their nuclear program, pretty easily.
<7> It's the post invasion stuff that's not so easy.
<9> I don't think so.
<8> How long has it taken to do that in Iraq?
<8> or similar.
<9> Iran won't be as easy to invade as Iraq was.
<7> how long did it take us to take over Iraq?
<7> what was that, like 2 weeks?
<0> it was pretty quick to get rid of saddam
<0> yeah
<9> less than that I believe.
<8> Its not done in Iraq
<0> like Noidea said, it's the 'after that' stuff ;p
<9> but we never had control of iraq.
<9> we never have
<0> that's not the point


Name:

Comments:

Please enter the result of the sum 63 + 46 (to avoid spam):






Return to #c++
or
Go to some related logs:

!!NoTrans: +streamtv
c++ std string tokeniser
sabryna liddle
undernet mangalia
#AllNiteCafe
#skype
preg_match_all whatismyip
#linux
spread vulva -movies
#mirc



Home  |  disclaimer  |  contact  |  submit quotes