@# Quotes DB     useful, funny, interesting





Google
 
Web www.quotesdb.info
Undernet  |  EFnet  |  Quakenet  |  Freenode  |  Dalnet  |  Ircnet  |  Galaxynet
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13



Comments:

<0> I'm so tired of the self absorbed narcissistic so called libertarians who dominate the US.
<0> Look, here's the reality.
<1> dominate?
<1> hahahaha
<1> yeah, we're all over those red states
<0> You are.
<1> holy out of touch with reality batman
<1> that's why we have an agnostic in office
<1> oh wait
<1> nope
<0> Holy ignorant, secular liberal.
<0> Exactly how original do you think you are
<2> batwoman is a lesbian
<0> 95% of the audience of most major networks and cable channels thinks exactly the same about the world that you do, khan.
<3> rdragon: that's hot
<2> yea ;)



<1> heh, that's a bush-level statement, JBlitzen
<1> you're clearly delusional
<0> Right, everything I say is about Bush or caused by Bush.
<0> No fearmongering there, no.
<1> no, i was comparing your idiotic statement to something bush would say
<0> It's like the salem republican trials.
<1> as you say it in the same style
<0> Oh, has Bush ever said anything like what I just said?
<0> Let's check.
<1> except you spoke english
<0> Nope!
<2> so, if JBlitzen weighs the same as a duck...
<0> But I guess if you only hear about him third hand from your controllers at CBS, you'd think otherwise.
<0> But hey, congratulations, at least you can feel like you have original thoughts.
<0> And if everyone has the same thoughts and agrees with you, that must be a sign that they're not coming from external sources.
<0> That would just be silly!
<1> you really are crazy
<0> Of course.
<0> To a crazy person, the world is crazy.
<1> if us secular liberals ruled the country, you'd be locked up
<0> Except, I'm not the one who thinks the world's crazy, am I.
<0> You are.
<1> no
<1> i think the world's the world
<0> You think the middle east is crazy, you think the government's crazy, you think anyone who opposes you is crazy
<1> you're the one seeing conspiracies
<0> I don't have to see conspiracies.
<0> In fact, I never said there was a conspiracy.
<0> When you see a duck on a pond, you don't have to think there's a conspiracy to acknowledge it.
<0> You just acknowledge it.
<0> That's called "sane".
<2> it's a witch
<3> how do you know your eyes are not fooling you?
<0> Fine, touch it.
<0> Investigate it.
<0> Scrutinize it.
<0> Molest it, if you're khan.
<3> same problem with all 5 senses
<0> I'm all for scrutinizing your beliefs.
<2> witches are hot, too
<1> so then religion is out?
<0> These CBS trusting Jon Stewart enjoying idiots aren't.
<0> They don't scrutinize anything.
<3> rdragon: if you don't mind the mole on their nose
<2> I don't !
<0> They just live comfortable in the knowledge that their claims won't be challenged.
<3> bet you like licking it during *** don't ya
<3> hrm. I'm making myself cringe
<0> khan, you're as religious as they come.
<4> JBlitzen: Here's some scrutiny. How about we question the purpose for the war and whether it's reasonable?
<0> You have beliefs about spirituality that you hold to with 100% conviction.
<0> You try to spread those beliefs.
<1> no
<0> You castigate people who don't follow them.
<1> i don't have "beliefs"
<0> Of course you do.
<0> Oh, I see.
<0> Because you call them facts, they're not beliefs.
<1> i have lack of evidence for any supernatural phenomenom
<0> But hey, it must be a fact, because CBS told you it is.
<3> this is boring. I'm out to smoke



<1> i don't even watch CBS you wacko
<1> that's for old people
<0> jb2, I've questioned that and I've always turned up with an answer I was absolutely pleased with.
<0> CBS is just a stand-in for whatever it is you do watch, read, or listen to.
<4> peterhu: About as much as you lack evidence for leprechauns, or a Smurf conspirancy.
<0> Be it the hippies on slashdot or Jon Stewart or the homo on HBO or whoever.
<1> jbatista: except believing in those would be insane
<1> not so for christianity
<1> or islam
<1> or judism
<1> you can believe in that mythology as fact and it's sacred
<1> you can't ridicule it
<1> you can't attack it
<1> that would be horrible
<0> See, jb2, it is as much a religious ***ertion to claim that any higher entity does not exist as it is to claim that one does.
<0> IF you accept that such claims necessarily can't be proven.
<1> except i have never and will never make that claim
<1> i'm agnostic
<1> go look it up
<1> i'll wait
<4> JBlitzen: Who stated that God doesn't exist?
<0> Apparently not very agnostic
<0> An agnostic wouldn't say that Christianity is insane
<1> to believe in something as fact that has no possible proof? that's insane
<1> it's as sane as believing in smurfs
<4> JBlitzen: What about a Smurf conspiracy?
<1> i can't prove that smurfs exist
<0> It has no possible disproof either.
<1> but i read a book that told me about them
<1> why is that insane to most people?
<0> You're not agnostic.
<0> Agnostics don't call non-agnostics insane.
<4> peterhu: It's because there's no Church of Papa Smurf.
<1> JBlitzen: not true
<1> agnostics say they don't know the answer
<1> they don't pretend to respect those idiots that know the answers
<1> and considering there are a lot of people with conflicting answers, someone's going to be pissed off in the after life =(
<0> I still can't quite pin down what your problem is, although it may be a distinct lack of empathy or comp***ion toward others
<1> there's that
<1> i simply dislike humans
<0> Agnostics have utterly no cause to be hostile toward religious people.
<0> Because the agnostic would have to acknowledge that, although some tidbits might be disprovable, any religion could possibly at some level be correct.
<1> you fail to understand the separation between the idea and the person
<1> the idea is plausible
<1> the person is an idiot
<4> Why not go through life entirely on that premise?
<0> Thus going back to my earlier conclusion
<0> your problem ... may be a distinct lack of empathy or comp***ion toward others
<0> Which isn't in any way unique to you
<1> i should feel comp***ion to the stupid?
<1> +for
<4> It's like those people who play the lottery. Your life is pretty sad when you're betting on odds that are worse than for your death by lightning or car accident.
<1> i don't feel sorry for them either
<0> jb2, no, it's not.
<4> Same thing when you need to be some sort of ideological sponge and absorb every idea that comes along no matter how improbable.
<0> The religious people I've known have found benefits in being religious that surp*** the infinitesimal chance of reward you mention.
<4> It's called escapism.
<0> No, it's not.
<1> it's called not having to think about things
<1> must be nice
<0> With some freaks it might be, but they're by no means the majority.
<4> Whether in religion, drug use, playing the lottery, or any other vice.
<0> khan, you don't think about things.
<0> I don't think you can compare drug use to religion.
<0> And what's wrong with playing the lottery if you enjoy it
<1> heh
<4> They're both escapism.
<0> Karl Marx could, of course.
<0> By your definition, so is this conversation.
<0> Or watching TV.
<0> Or looking out a window.
<4> Karl Marx was a socialist, among other things.
<1> except, while watchint tv, people realize it's fantasy
<0> You can't just define escapism as whatever it is you don't do.


Name:

Comments:

Please enter the result of the sum 63 + 46 (to avoid spam):






Return to #c++
or
Go to some related logs:

guys4men
#linux
Dianne Llanera?
#linux
fatmom fuck
epimethius
win32/adminMisc.pm download
c0misire
videodefou
#AllNiteCafe



Home  |  disclaimer  |  contact  |  submit quotes