| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Comments:
<0> Not super heavy, but unusually heavy for such a small package
<1> you = freak
<1> do you go to a range?
<2> you now have an "armory" in your home
<0> me = tired of keeping odd numbers and types of ammo
<0> I'm standardizing
<2> according to one of those gun-grabber bills that fortunately didn't p***
<0> 115 grain fmj for practice, 124 grain hydrashok for defense
<0> Economy of scale, could resell it for a tidy profit
<0> Hydrashok isn't really range ammo, khan
<0> $.40 a round or so
<2> one hopes you never need 1000rds to _use_
<0> Compared to about $.10 for fmj
<0> Yeah, I hope so too
<0> But I do need to test magazines with it and such
<2> yes
<0> So that's like 150 rounds right there
<0> And make sure the compact P9 is broken in on it, which accounts for more
<2> and see how much more it drops than the 115
<0> Yeah
<0> And then periodic practice
<0> Gotta use a few every round trip and rotate the ammo
<0> Still, 1000 should last me a few years, I figure
<0> Better to cry once than regret it
<0> Khan missed out on all the great arguments in favor of it and only heard the 1000 rounds of defense ammo part haha
<0> No wonder he = liberal
<0> Man this is heavy
<0> Gee, only 30 pounds
<0> Not that heavy when it has shoulder straps, pretty heavy when it's a tiny box
<2> first time I picked up a case of .223 (1400 rds) I thought I was gonnna get a hernia
<0> I imagine
<0> If this is 30, then it'd be 45 for 9mm, and .223's probably three times the weight, so over a hundred pounds
<0> Ouch
<0> Er, 45 for 1400
<2> nah, .223 isn't that heavy.... 55gr for but bullets
<2> maybe another 60-70 for the casing/powder
<0> Yeah, but bigger cartridges
<3> jb = freak
<0> Maybe
<0> Heh
<0> Cool
<0> 9mm Luger +P+ 124 grain Hydra-Shok JHP
<0> "Law Enforcement Use Only"
<0> Yeah, sure
<3> wish my wife's w2 would show up
<3> jb = mega freak
<3> pretty sure i have all my 1099-divs, so now i just need my 1099-ints, and the wife's student loan info, and i should be able to get cracking on the ol' taxes
<3> i like to have them filed in feburary
<3> oh great
<3> i'm stuck with all these losers!
<3> hmm, job opportunity with trimble with a 25 minute commute
<3> tempting
<0> Nice
<1> one of their products that monitors vehicles
<1> shipping, etc
<0> You will be big brother
<0> Beloved friend of teamsters everywhere
<1> heh
<1> how is this a guarantee? travelocity will guarantee everything is right, or they will work with their partners to make it right. wow!
<1> work with!
<1> that doesn't guarantee anything will be solved, though
<0> You're supposed to skip the commercials
<2> peterhu the Trimble that does GPS stuff?
<1> but how else can i mock them? or find flaws in their logic?
<1> vic, yeah
<0> Their logic is pretty good
<0> They need an excuse to get their names on television again, and they ran the last ad campaign dry, so this is a new one
<0> Like with pizza hut
<0> They had the 5 for 5 deal or whatever
<0> Now they have a 7's deal
<0> Whatever, they're not deals, they just get the name out
<0> I like how fictitious most everything is on TV, it helps me realize that the m*** media is just as conniving
<1> yeah, i love cash back on cars
<1> cash back! the very notion is absurd
<2> yes it is, and it's a popular selling gimmick
<1> or advertisements that make it seem like the seller is actually taking a loss on the product (like most infomercials)
<1> hilarious to me, really
<4> Like the magic-bullet?
<5> bleh, this IRC client ****s. Time to get xchat
<0> I really like the part where they say
<1> xchat > you
<0> "This spatula is normally priced at $799.99, but it's your's for the low low price of $95.00!"
<1> four EASY paments of 19949.24
<4> But you see, the spatula replaces all those old instruments you won't need anymore.
<4> Though to do that, you need to get the 345 add-on thingies. that come FREE witht he spatula, as a bonus for the next 30 minutes only.
<4> But since the infomercial is probably airring SOMEWHERE every single 30 minutes anyway...
<1> oh boo hoo, some redneck in the everglades has to leave his land due to immanent domain. he lives in a shack (literally, he put it together himself) on 140+ acres, and the government is paying him $5 million for it, pfft
<1> i'm sure he could take that $5 million and buy as much land in the west some where and live his dream of being a hermit
<1> instead, he bought a mansion, and is now complaining on the news
<1> boofreakinghoo
<6> how can I clean the memory of a pointer ?
<1> "clean"?
<1> windex(address);
<0> "emminent" domain
<1> you lie
<0> Haha
<1> emminent = underlined in spell checker, therefore you = idiot
<1> heh
<0> And we don't mind it so much, but the recent court ruling was about townships using it for no reason other than to put in more profitable businesses
<6> look, I have a pointer
<0> Haha
<1> yeah, that i have a problem with
<5> indeed
<1> the law is there for public use
<6> and in his address are other informations
<1> except they make the claim it helps the local economy
<1> therefore it benefits everyone
<1> pffft to that
<0> Yeah
<1> ah well, it's 3 pm, i should probably shave and shower
<0> Heh
<0> I just did an hour ago
<1> i'm living the jb life
<1> now i just need to live in a box
<0> Yeah, except my mondays are like that too
<0> Haha
<0> Go pay your mortage, gaey boy
<1> and watch my soap operas on the teevee
<0> Or mortgages
<0> I don't watch soap operas
<1> sure sure
<0> But given the nature of primetime network TV
<0> I can't imagine how I'd be disappointed
<1> you call them your "stories"
<0> Haha
<1> and you eat bonbons (crack) on your mat in front of the tv, that is propped up on a crate you stole from crazy larry at knife point
<1> and you're the envy of everyone else in the alley
<1> we know
<0> Hold on a minute, uploading a picture of the bullets
<2> ^VulturU^ ok, what about it
<2> you've got a pointer to something(s)
<6> wait, I`ll put the code on the noidea site
<6> yes
<6> and I want to empty it every time I run the source
<5> define what you mean by "empty it"
<6> tu put "0"
<6> nothing :)
<2> why?
<2> "0" is NOT nothing
<6> ok, I want to put number 0 in it , it`s that ok ?
<5> In all but 4 or 5 cases, no
<5> imagine. T* foo = &someFoo;
<5> Where T is a complex type - lots of internal structure
<5> What happens when you walk in and stick 0 all over the structure?
<2> ^VulturU^ a small hint.... define the operators += -= *= and /= first, then write + _ * / in terms of them
<6> ok, thanks , I`ll try
<2> your operator= has a bug in it
<2> DrkMatter what's +^ ?
<6> and what`s the bug ? :)
Return to
#c++
or
Go to some related
logs:
#linuxhelp
#c++
70 eeeee tits
#MissKitten
#linux
lazy condition code
#linux
#AllNiteCafe
john wesley remix lover why -harding
#linux
|
|