@# Quotes DB     useful, funny, interesting





Google
 
Web www.quotesdb.info
Undernet  |  EFnet  |  Quakenet  |  Freenode  |  Dalnet  |  Ircnet  |  Galaxynet
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11



Comments:

<0> it's all politics here.
<1> it's too bad I wasn't there. I would walked right over the ****heads
<1> and injury to a student sounds like a "good thing" to me
<0> I don't know what makes everyone here so obnoxious.
<0> The doctor thing is annoying me more and more.
<1> it's the way I grew up
<0> telling me I have to do this for my own good, or they'll drop me as a patient, I know what's coming.
<0> bastards.
<0> I'm supposed to wait 20 minutes after I get my allergy shots, I usually wait right outside the door talking on my phone sitting on a bench.
<0> they told me I'm not allowed to do that, for my own safety.
<0> I told them to have the doctor call me if he has an issue with it.
<0> If they'd put it in terms of, our insurance doesn't allow it, fine, or it's a liability issue, fine.
<1> not talk on the phone?
<0> But, for my own safety, that annoys me.
<0> the doctor wrote me a letter, he's going to avoid me.
<0> and I'm sure it' sgoing to say, you have to do this for your own good, if you don't like it, stop coming here.



<1> what's the issue? what arenn't you supposed to do?
<0> You're supposed to wait the 20 minutes afterwards in the waiting room
<0> then get checked for bumps on your arms.
<1> where all the sick people are
<0> it's an allergy clinic
<0> no sick people really
<1> so outside is unsafe?
<0> I say, who cares
<0> I understand the risk of being outside
<0> I could have a reaction and die
<0> the risk is low, I'm willing to deal with it
<1> where you live, yeah
<0> I don't need the nurse worrying about my safety.
<1> all those gangs running around, shooting at each other
<1> all the drugs falling out of the sky and addicting everyone
<0> There's some % of people who react suddenly to the shots
<0> an allergic reaction
<0> and need medical attention.
<0> you could potentially die from the reaction.
<0> But, if that's their only concern, I don't think it's any of their business.
<0> I don't know why doctors feel the need to be all paternalistic.
<0> But, again if they just wanted to say it's an insurance concern
<0> fine, I'll do whatever they ask
<2> hello
<2> #include <conio.h> int main(void) { getch(); return 0; } <- is this a standard C++ code?
<0> as long as they're saying, you have to do this, or else, it's for your own good. It annoys me.
<3> stipee, nope
<2> peterhu why not?
<3> conio.h, getch
<2> getch is not standard but doesn't that still make it a conforming C++ program, just not strictly conforming?
<0> I'm not 30' from the building, I'm not really concerned about the risk of me suddenly dying.
<0> And, I've seen how they treat the other doctors who come in
<0> they get the shot, then just immediately leave, and never come back.
<3> you asked if it was standard c++ code
<3> i said no
<3> your code doesn't "conform" to a standard, the compiler does
<0> mine conforms to a standard
<0> the Noidea Coding Standards.
<4> does anyone how can i enumerate all the attached usb devices and get their names/vendor ids? (apis only)
<0> the best ever devised.
<3> pfft
<2> peterhu in C standard I have this
<2> A strictly conforming program
<2> A conforming program
<2> is it different in C++? this program does conform to standard C as far as I can see it
<1> stipee I don't recall those terms in the C++ standard, but my copy is at home and I cannot check here
<2> this is from C
<2> A strictly conforming program shall use only those features of the language and library specified in this Standard. It shall not produce output dependent on any unspecified, undefined, or implementation-defined behavior, and shall not exceed any minimum implementation limit.
<2> A conforming program is one that is acceptable to a conforming implementation.
<2> also "A conforming implementation may have extensions (including additional library functions), provided they do not alter the behavior of any strictly conforming program. "
<1> stipee nobody ****ing cares about C here
<3> any C standard, or terminology, is irrelevant to C++
<1> NOBODY
<3> and i personally don't care for terminology nazis, use conforms how you want
<2> vawjrwrk well C++ accepted most of the things from C standard. I'd like to quote C++ standard but I don't have it
<3> but what you pasted is not *standard* c++
<3> as the standard doesn't say anything about conio.h
<2> peterhu C standard does not say anything about conio.h yet it is a conforming C program
<0> so, a strictly conforming program can't have functions in C?
<3> this argument is incredibly stupid
<1> stipee let's try it again, nobody here gives a **** about "standard conforming C"



<5> who gives a monkey's
<0> a monkey's what?
<3> to me, anything covered by the standard is standard c++
<5> a monkey's.
<3> anything else is not standard, period
<3> that includes boost, MFC, C libraries, what have you
<2> vawAFKhome so quote C++ standard. or stop whining
<1> stipee SHUT THE **** UP NOW, I said the standard is at home and I cannot check it fromthe office
<1> if you keep this crap up you're toast
<2> vawjrwrk your standard is at home, I don't have it. so I quoted C standard because someone who knows C++ (obviously not you) might know if the same applies to C++
<3> nothing about C applies to C++
<1> good bye ***hoe
<2> peterhu bull****
<3> ?
<6> I'd like the toast with some butter and coffee please
<1> goddamned ****ing language lawyeres
<1> I shoulda given him gribroulle's private address
<3> heh
<7> heh
<5> heh
<3> HEH
<5> :-\
<5> well he was at it on efnet too, simultaneously
<5> and still is
<5> sigh
<8> Well, he's *kinda* right, insofar as "a conforming program" is a very loosely defined term... but, really, just because you can weasel-word something like conio.h in does not make it part of the standard C++ language. Yeesh.
<9> so d'tors for a cl*** are called in reverse order of the declared inheritence order, right?
<5> right
<1> it's one of the reasons I dn't hang out on EFnet
<6> I didn't get that gribroulle joke
<9> Cowmoo, was that right for me?
<5> word.
<6> ImHungry yes
<9> ok thanks...
<3> his original question was "is it standard c++"
<5> n;p
<3> it's not
<9> was just wondering if that was specified by the standard or not..
<3> non-standard c++ doesn't mean it's not "conforming" c++ code
<5> ImHungry: take a minute or two to think about why that has to be the case
<5> (helps to know the why in addition to the what, etc etc)
<9> Cowmoo, well i understand why you have to call the d'tors in reverse order from child to super cl***, but I am talking about a cl*** that inherits from multiple cl***es.. it seems rather arbitrary which leg of the inheritence tree you want to climb first..
<5> oh
<9> i was asking specifically about multiple inheritence and the order of the d'tors: cl*** A : public B, public C.. which leg of the tree is traversed first? B? C? and if it's C is that just an arbitrary choice made by the standards committee?
<0> I've got a headache, sitting in front of a computer too long.
<5> ok that I don't know
<9> ;)
<5> Noidea: drink more water
<5> and blink more often
<9> well on g++ 3 it seems to pick the last cl*** tree to call the d'tor first.. but i wanted to know if that is standard or compiler-dependent.. :/ oh well.. anyone know?
<1> the destructors are _supposed_ to be called in the reverse order of the constructors
<5> vawjrwrk: right, but he's asking about MI, and which tree branch it goes up first
<7> Noidea: you should sleep a little probably ( i don't want to be considered as a smart adviser doctor, anyway) :)
<3> irr, that's illegal in the states
<6> peterhu taking payment after work?
<3> you can't go around giving people fellacio and charging money for it
<3> that's prostitution
<1> I'm pretty sure things are constructed in the order in which they're mentioned
<6> Umm whats fellacio?
<1> a mispelling
<3> i'd spell check, but that's one word i don't want to hit up dictionary.com for heh
<6> Oh you meant folic acid
<3> (from work)
<6> And I thought prostitution was invented in the states. Howcome its illegal there?
<3> who knows
<3> it's legal in parts of nevada
<3> that's about it
<3> and then it's only in registered brothels
<6> Is it legal for 2 people to have *** outside marriage?
<3> of course
<3> just can't charge for it
<6> Can one person give the other a small gift after the rapport?


Name:

Comments:

Please enter the result of the sum 63 + 46 (to avoid spam):






Return to #c++
or
Go to some related logs:

#php
#php
repel prank button
regedit from java
#linux
#AllNiteCafe
#javascript
#php
ic cumnija ta St Lukes Hospital Malta
#chatzone



Home  |  disclaimer  |  contact  |  submit quotes