| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Comments:
<0> *shrug* it should be ok
<1> i spackled them up and got full deposit
<1> now i just poke holes in my own walls
<1> heh, i really dislike doing UI
<1> i see exactly how i want this to work in my mind, but i'm so demotivated to get it done as it's such boring work
<0> heh
<2> +
<2> +
<2> +
<0> -
<2> f
<2> All clean
<2> Wait
<2> 32z43c bv 67u ,m. -0[/
<2> All clean
<0> ...?
<2> .
<3> i have a problem about c++ anyone can help me??
<0> just ask
<3> ok
<3> i want to sum very big number what must i do?
<4> you don't like making UIs peterhu?
<0> how big is 'very big', collboy_16 ?
<4> why don't you outsource it to India?
<3> 10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
<3> like this
<4> wtf?
<0> looks like you need a 'big number' library, then
<5> collboy_16: Use an arbitrary precision library.
<4> why don't you put that in scientific notation?
<4> what use is a number like that?
<4> seriously, what could you possibly be doing that requires such a large number?
<3> trke bilen var m???
<3> thnx friendss
<3> but i cant understand english much:((
<5> collboy_16: http://swox.com/gmp/
<0> why do you need such a big number?
<5> collboy_16: Then use libgmpxx as C++ front-end
<4> I'm still waiting to hear wtf he could possibly be calculating.
<4> 64bit numbers should be large enough for almost any integer math.
<5> lol, sure. You can't think of anything so it isn't needed :p
<4> unless you're a chemist, or physicsist.
<5> Or do cryptography
<0> or a cryptographist
<1> pfft
<1> from personal experience
<1> the code from india ****s
<4> it's a UI peterhu
<4> how bad could they **** it up?
<1> very badly
<4> then, stop payment on the check.
<3> i want to evaluate fibinakki series in this numbers
<1> this time i'm not firing off as many "WTF?!?!?!" an hour, but it's still high
<4> stop payment on the check
<1> not my check
<4> and tell them to come get it if they want it.
<0> heh
<4> then, go hide.
<4> flooding what?
<5> repeating the same line over and over and over again.
<4> what do you want him to do?
<4> I can't tell if you're joking?
<5> I had a ban set here that stopped them all - someone removed that again and now I have to watch this kick message and bans being and AND removed again; so no, I'm not joking. It's annoying
<5> being added*
<5> but nevermind - once my bnc is finished, I'll have it filtered away :/
<1> run, what was that ban?
<5> *1?!*@* and *21!*@* through *25!*@ (as to not ban Noidea128). If anyone wants to join that matches one of those, then we take the *1?@ apart too, into 9 or less bans.
<5> The disadvantage is of course that if an innocent person is banned, they won't get a nice message for it; they simply won't know why they are banned.
<5> Does undernet STILL have no ban excemptions?
<5> unbelievable - what are those "coders" doing?
<6> they code stuff?? not that I can see
<6> the last thing I noticed they coded is when one couldn't log into X more than once (upper limit used to be 3 but settable by each user)
<5> The last Big Thing that coder-com did was removing my (almost finished) code for MODE +A/U from the source code.
<1> is there a mode for only allowing registered users, like freenet?
<5> (see http://www.xs4all.nl/~carlo17/irc/cp***.html)
<5> peterhu: yes, +r
<1> i haven't registered in along time; does the registration process have bot thwarting mechanisms (like those squiggly images, etc)? perhaps we should just go +r
<5> I'm all for that.
<5> However, it seems that some people cannot register...
<6> damn few newbies are registered w/ X
<1> erm
<1> freenet = freenode
<1> heh
<5> It should be possible to have a custom (channel specific) message sent to people when they cannot join.
<1> that would be nice
<5> Then you can tell them to message a bot, or something, to get in.
<1> for +k too, so we won't get #c people in here =)
<4> what's +k?
<1> key
<4> I like some of the #c people
<4> like Tamama.
<5> As an alternative, we could make the channel +m and /msg everyone who joins what to do to get +v. That way you won't see stupid spam bots talk on the channel.
<1> well, i mean those that should ask in #c but don't know the key
<1> it would at least print a message containing a riddle to derive the key
<1> alternatively, we could go +k main too heh
<5> peterhu: I I tried that once - then you get NOBODY anymore - lol. Most people on irc are so incredidbly stupid.
<1> but then how would anyone get in #c or #c++, as people only get into #c by asking us
<1> we'd need some visible people for them to harr*** for the key
<5> Well, actually - I put the key in the topic. But nobody seems to be smart enough to read a channel topic if the channel is keyed.
<1> hah
<1> i didn't even think of that either
<5> So... best way: we go all to #C++.real, and set a key there. Then +m #C++ and msg the people (with a bot) who join there about what to do to get on #C++.real
<1> and redirect JBlitzen to #C++.queer
<6> lolololol
<4> http://captaincapitalism.blogspot.com/2006/04/bend-over-so-that-china-may-kick-your.html
<4> http://www.joannejacobs.com/mtarchives/016199.html
<6> There have, I suppose, been other peoples in other places who yearned for a life of mediocrity. But leave it to the French to make a revolution in its name. ..... great quote
<7> e:\SoftWareDevelopment\HomeWorks\week1\homeWork1\main.cpp(94): error C2243: 'type cast' : conversion from 'Sphere *__w64 ' to 'Shape *' exists, but is inaccessible
<7> sorry
<7> why when I try to ***ing a cl*** to an abstrac cl*** pointer it will give me that error?
<7> all the methods in the derivated cl*** from the abstract one are public...
<6> what does line 94 look like?
<7> I fixed it I forgot to make the inheritance public.
<7> sorry
<1> heh, when i say "HKLM" i always say "H-KEY-L-M"
<1> any other windows programmers here do that?
<1> probably because i think of the define for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE
<8> hello
<4> the registry is for losers.
<1> indeed
<1> i'm trying to migrate them away from it entirely
<1> there's no reason to run services as LocalSystem too
<1> the windows security model is one of the best
<1> unfortunately, *no one* uses it properly
<6> maybe that's because MS never bothered to lay out a good "here's what we have in mind" document
<1> yeah
<9> Partly because way too many apps cannot be run as a restricted user, or do so but not well.
<1> too bad people didn't look at UNIX and go, hey, we can do the same on windows too
<6> too bad people didn't look at ANYTHING outside MS and go... "Hey, that's a good idea"
<1> running with least privs would be a fantastic start
<9> The use of something akin to the executable bit would be good, too; this notion of "I'm a slut, I'll run everything, long as the name's right" is ridiculous.
<1> yeah, i have to blame microsoft for a culture of mediocre developers
<6> nah, don't blame them, there's been a culture of mediocre developers for longer than they've been around
<6> of course they certainly capitalized on the concept
Return to
#c++
or
Go to some related
logs:
#php
#linuxhelp
#linux
#linuxhelp
#chatzone
#AllNiteCafe
#gentoo
tragedyann irc
#linux
Unable to connect SQL server VHCS
|
|