| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Comments:
<0> it processes the client registrations first
<0> when it gets to a service registration, it throws saying that the type has been "registered for activation elsewhere"
<0> as if that matters...
<1> Check out this double talk from OMG: "Likewise,
<1> compilers exist today to translate data and application models defined in MOF and
<1> UML into those high level languages and thus onto the platforms that implement
<1> existing systems;"
<1> How does a UML to Java translator qualify as a compiler?
<0> when i new up the type, i expect it to look at the client registrations, talk to the service host (same process in this case), the service host should look for a service registration for the incoming message, instantiate the singleton, and give back an object reference to serve as a proxy
<0> why those two operations are related in configuration is beyond me
<1> report a bug
<0> unfortunately all this is becoming deprecated with WCF
<0> which does not appear to have the same limitation
<0> actually, WCF looks quite good from what i've seen
<0> i look forward to using it over remoting
<2> IRR what is your definition of "compiler" ?
<0> screw it, i'll just make an app config entry containing the activation url, problem solved
<0> just looks stupid as there are two places you have to change if you want to alter how things are served
<3> howdy
<3> hey does anyone know of any articles or studies that talk about having to program and do tech support at the same time?
<3> im wondering about psychological impact, effectiveness of doing so etc
<1> vawAFKhome something that converts to byte or object code
<2> IRR that seems like an odd output requirement
<0> doing tech support alone would have a largely negative psychological impact, i would believe
<3> lol peter
<3> im trying to prove to my boss that programming and ts at the same time does not work
<0> i don't know of any studies in this area, though
<3> ok
<4> I had to do TS and programming at my previous job... it was horrible
<5> I think it's harmless if you need a break and feel fine about talking to idiots
<4> I ended up not responding to the hopeles idiots
<1> Atrix why are you so worried about being productive in either?
<4> because it would have taken all day to write out instructions that they might have a chance of understanding
<6> Atrix: In terms of programming productivity, you would probably be right that TS interferes... but overall it would probably benefit in that you get to know what parts are either not working, not working as expected, or simply weird :P
<1> This is your chance to not do either one very well and then attribute it to your doing 2 things at the same time.
<3> IRR: cause my boss is getting on me for not getting anything done, when i have to check email every 5 minutes and he re-shifts priorities constantly, i have to stop and help people out etc its a nightmare
<1> Try to understand what he wants
<6> check email every 5 minutes... lol
<3> Tamama: i have thougth about that, what i was thinking is if there was more than just me programming, we could take turns handling ts one day then doing new code the next or something
<4> sounds like he doesn't know what he wants
<5> :)) you have a nice boss :D
<1> If he wants something to show to his boss then give him that
<1> Don't give him real work
<2> Atrix it may not work for you, but NOT supporting what you write causes you to be a poorer programmer, IMO
<6> Atrix: we here generally let programmers TS their own programs :)
<3> yeah totaly makes sense vawj
<2> "shielding" the developers from their ****ups, just let's them **** up again
<3> no totaly, i really agree with that
<6> and simply dont check your email every 5 minutes (btw, that can be automated)
<3> our stuff is all web based front end w/ some web languages, db and c++ backend
<3> so some of the problems are like people have adware or viruses
<3> and i have to make sure the servers dont go down too, we use a crappy db he insists on that crashes alot
<3> and ugh
<6> so have a proper TS -before- that
<3> i have to check email every 5 mins cause if an issue goes unaddressed (server down, user hit error, user has question) for about 10 minutes, he says im doing a bad job
<3> :P
<3> it serioulsy feels hopeless and he thinks im just not working hard enough hehe
<6> so stop programming and only do TS
<6> that should make him happy
<3> it's not, he is mad none of the code is getting done
<3> i am doing the TS
<1> Whats the qualification of this boss?
<6> fire your boss
<3> i wish i could tamama :P
<7> Atrix
<7> Document all of your tech support work
<1> He's like my second-last boss in Pk
<3> his qualifications are crappy, he can barely handle the logic of a for loop but he thinks he knows it all about code
<7> And set up outlook or something to beep you when it receives an email, so you don't have to constantly check.
<3> hmm
<2> outlook DOES beep when it gets EMail
<1> I say you add fake entries to your tech support log
<3> hehe
<2> do NOT fake the log
<7> Only if you for some insane reason have sound turned on
<1> Awww.. no need to get all ethical about it
<7> But this would be one of those insane reasons
<3> lol
<3> this is rediculous
<3> :P
<3> thanks for the input
<5> I would support my stuff only to be able to create a comprehensive help section
<1> vawjrwrk enlighten me: what problems can he get into by faking his log?
<4> why would you want to fake the log?
<5> IRR: getting fired?
<4> only to gain something you're not entitled to
<2> getting fired would be the 1st
<2> falsifying records generally isn't a wise thing to do
<3> yeah, im not out to lie
<1> That'll be if the boss actually goes off to verify the records.
<1> Actually I concur with the ethical point of view
<2> sooner or later _someone_ will verify them
<0> falsifying records perhaps unwise, but if you're JBlitzen, check off the 'M' *** checkbox if you like
<5> I think that letting your boss know all the isues may make your job easyer, cuz he won't ask that much from you
<7> Document
<7> Then show
<1> But Atrix's first priority is to get his boss to stop bugging him. If he doesn't do that, he wouldn't be able to work anyway.
<5> you can let him know "I'm stuck with something, there's a bug in the api, I'm trying to work around"
<1> sk8ing it'll put him in a bad mood
<1> Boss doesn't want to think
<2> well, the EMails (for TS are timestamped already, there's some journal mechanism in outlook, and one can always use the tasklist thing to track the TS tasks)
<1> Or make decisions about difficult stuff.
<3> lol peter
<1> If you make him do that, he'll hate you.
<2> it's a shame the idiots at MS never bothered to put some automatic way to TIME the tasks into the system
<2> (they cleverly left room for you to put in times manually, but left out the start/stop time buttons)
<2> just another of MS's famous 80% products
<2> ok, IRR why must a compiler produce "object" or "byte" code?
<1> vawjrwrk because thats what it usually does. The point is, a compiler usually converts programmatic instructions into a 2G or 1G language.
<1> And Java/C++ are not that.
<2> usually doesn't suffice for a definition for me
<1> Further, those tools don't have the expressive power encomp***ed by these languages.
<1> So to say that they "compile" a complete or functional representation of the system is not true.
<1> But they use words inappropriately, which helps others pay them to do practically nothing.
<2> you're off on something and I"m not following
<1> vawjrwrk I don't know many things you know. So how do we define a compiler?
<2> I submit that the C++ "compiler" in vc2005 doesn't produce "byte" nor "object" code in all cases. it can produce MSIL
<1> I agree
<2> IRR i've been doing this crap for 41 years now, I know a LOT
<4> A compiler is a computer program (or set of programs) that translates text written in a computer language (the source language) into another computer language (the target language).
<1> a compiler usually converts programmatic instructions into a 2G or 1G language << do you agree with this? Its general enough.
<4> -- Wiki
<2> I'm suggesting that the word compiler describes a larger collection of programs than you're currently willing to let
<1> Ok, but is that generally held, even if its technically correct?
<2> IRR depends on what you mean by 1G and 2G languages (the boundaries keep moving.... kinda like the middle-east and borders)
<2> rdragon that one I'll buy
<8> hehe
<8> 4GL baby!
<1> vawjrwrk boundaries for 1, 2 and 3 G are pretty static as far as I can tell. I'd like to see an example that says otherwise.
<4> k, I take cash and credit
<2> 4GL is sooooooo 20th century
<8> :>
<9> Whats the topic of today?
<2> IRR maybe they have by now, seems all the schools can do these days is try to name what those of use actually working have been doing
<9> All the India people are taking up the programming jobs
<2> so how's the weather over in Boise today, we're getting light snow here
<10> Don't troll. And don't come in here whilst on Warez channels
<9> Boise?
<9> Idaho?
<2> yeah, Boise, ID
<9> I wouldnt know myconnection just travels through boise
<9> Sorry
<2> well, ditch the warez channel
<9> Why ?
<10> You come into a channel full of software developers, who write software for a living, and ask why we're against software piracy?
<10> or "IP piracy" in general? (much as I hate the term IP)
<3> lol asriel
<4> yeah, disrespectful at best heh
<11> is it ok to call LoadLibrary without a corresponding FreeLibrary?
Return to
#c++
or
Go to some related
logs:
#AllNiteCafe
#AllNiteCafe
#php
#linuxhelp
#windows
PHP get_content_mime
#java
redhat 9 imake
#chatzone
allboys undernet
|
|