| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Comments:
<0> well, I'll question his Javascript as well then :)
<1> maybe, don't know, the only problem he's currently having is with a bug in IE when windows might overlap scrollbars, they write "on top" by mistake
<0> make sure he's testing in IE7, it *will* break rafts of pages that worked fine in IE6
<1> but nobody has IE7 yet
<0> true. but they will "shortly", at least in terms of development cycles
<2> IE7 pfft
<3> Who is this MrAshe2?
<4> peterhu pfft
<2> i'd actually consider using it if the rendering engine was vastly improved
<2> instead, the interface is clunky and it's marginally better at best for rendering
<2> i'll p***
<2> transparent png support fixed yet?
<2> looks like they've worked on it
<2> http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2005/04/26/412263.aspx
<0> yes, transparent PNGs work
<0> welcome to 1997
<5> I want to write cl*** that reads bitmap and compress it in jpeg
<5> any hint?
<5> I don't want to use any api
<1> and why do you want to do this?
<0> you don't want to use any API? Then you're in for a hard job
<0> as in, super hard. JPEG is not a trivial format to implement a codec for
<5> HmmZ`
<5> well, I've to do this
<5> and I've never tried this before ... !
<6> You're going to have fun these next few months (at least)
<7> heh, that hard?
<1> hmm WHY do you have to do this?
<1> who says so?
<5> well actually I've to save these pics from a mobile device to my server
<5> through GPRS so if it is compressed it would be cheap
<5> sk8ing, any resources or hint?
<6> What kind of mobile device?
<8> if they are on a mobile device wouldn't they already be in some compressed form ?
<6> I doubt the pictures are saved as bmp in the first place
<7> most probably jpeg
<5> well actually I don't know the complete specification may be I've to convert from jpeg to j2k
<5> but to get start with I'm trying to convert first from bmp to jpeg
<6> Then know the specs and come back when you know
<1> well, when you know what you're doing, come back
<5> exactly sk8ing you're right!
<5> any hint :S
<1> yeah, find out what you're doing
<5> well, I've told you
<5> let me know if any one have tried it. converting bmp to jpeg
<0> Sure, thousands of times. Use an API, do not write the code yourself
<1> why do you care if anyone has tired it
<0> A) You'll get it wrong B) It'll take you months to realise you did
<1> tried it
<0> libjpeg is the canonical implementation
<1> your insistance on NO api is foolish
<0> and works on virtually every platform with enough CPU/RAM to run the codec
<5> HmmZ`
<1> peterhu where does one get the beta for Office 7
<5> :S
<2> http://www.microsoft.com/office/preview/beta/overview.mspx
<2> office 12 you mean, right? =)
<9> office 12 sux
<9> open office rulez :)
<2> the concise ellegance of an open office supporter
<10> (to peterhu)
<1> yeah, thanks
<1> ConiX I'm using open office 2.0 and the word processor could be a bit more intuitive
<10> C***.
<10> :P
<1> and it's not that I'm a heavy word processing junkie either, but things shouldn't be as hard to find as they seem to be
<8> the bids on rentacoder are always to amazing low
<8> I should put my projects from work on there and just relax whilst other do my job :)
<1> have you seen the code you get?
<8> no, but I can imagen the quality :)
<11> I did a project on there once and my initial submission got rejected because I made it more flexible than the seller wanted :|
<10> the product quality is more than often directly bound to the parice
<10> parice = price
<11> not to mention there is a miniimum to get the money from rentacoder
<1> cn28h did you require that some options be specified each run? or were there some nicely settable defaults
<11> so rentacoder pocketed my money
<11> it was something horribly simple, no configuration required
<11> I don't remember the details, it was the first (and last) time I used the site a few years ago
<2> sigh
<2> i just wasted a day debugging this when if i had just turned on catch all exceptions, it probably would have been fairly evident why it was exhibiting different behavior (not a failure)
<2> basically, we noticed after we did some work to abstract things out to a new interface, the behavior should have stayed the same; but we found an bug in the old build which was fixed in the new build
<2> so i've been trying to determine why
<2> an exception was being eaten
<2> i *hate* that
<2> (in the old code)
<2> the new code inadvertantly fixed the cause of the exception
<2> also should have checked the log file
<2> would have shown the exception there
<2> ah well, time well spent
<12> http://www.durf.org/log/archives/huge_manatee.jpg
<13> you're a huge manatee
<2> that he is
<14> I'm feeling pretty gruntled, myself
<9> vawjrwrk about yours 11 recommended books, how much time it takes to read them all?
<2> 42 years
<9> how much time you wasted to read those boks ?
<9> wtf......
<9> 42 years?
<9> you're kidding me
<10> 42 is T3H answer
<11> better start reading today
<10> don't you know? it's the answer to life and everything else
<9> If I read them it will take maximum 2-3 years to read them I think
<15> ConiX, the point is not in `reading` them per se
<9> well I don't plan to waste my life reading just those books :S
<15> good good, and you as if professionally miss the point yet again
<11> (other part of life will be wasted on reading harry potter)
<9> I plan also learning other program languages as well
<9> not only C++
<11> heretic!
<9> but wait wait
<6> hexen!
<9> for example
<11> haha
<9> java script and php syntax is quite simular to C++ syntax
<6> Wrong
<9> right?
<6> Well, it has {, }, ( and ), ok
<9> but if you know C++ very well it wouldn't be hard to migrate to java script and php
<9> right?
<15> i actually didn't find php any similar to cpp :/
<6> Then again you don't know C++ anyway
<6> Every language is dead easy
<6> Except maybe brain**** but it's still easy, just not much readable
<15> brain****?
<6> Yup
<15> what's that?
<6> A language
<15> hmm
<15> oh god
<6> You can call me Ashe
<15> <3
<2> i'll still call you bitch though
<16> Anyone got an idea what im doing wrong?
<16> http://www.noidea128.org/sourcefiles/16327.html
<4> uh, good lord
<4> how ugly
<4> are we supposed to be able to compile and run this in our heads to figure out what's wrong?
<16> so you like it
<16> No
<16> I doubt it
<4> well, what's wrong then?
<2> Giovanni_: like i mentioned yesterday, L"mIrc"
<16> Yes but that wont work either
<2> it is not the same as casting "mIrc" to wide
<2> well, that's *definitely* wrong now
Return to
#c++
or
Go to some related
logs:
context menu in firefox
#php
convert vcproj from vc8 to vc7
#mirc
Multiplaying matrices
osx 10.2 torrent
mirc change version replay
simushop
#chatzone
tal monti
|
|
