| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Comments:
<0> ****, =)
<0> never thought like that
<1> struct A{ int x; }; struct B{ A* a }; B* b = new B; b->a = new A; b->a->x = 20;
<0> i got it, =)
<0> i cant believe why i can't thi,nkso simple
<1> it just adds a scene node called "RobotNode" to the scene, and returns the SceneNode* to it
<0> i am thinking more complicated
<0> thanks
<0> rdragon: but if there were () i could understand iy
<2> i lost conn
<2> rdragon: SceneNode *node1 = (mSceneMgr->getRootSceneNode())->createChildSceneNode( "RobotNode" ); is this illegal?
<1> no, same thing
<0> rdragon: why dont they use ()?
<1> because it's redundant
<2> lol
<2> my messages come now
<1> a->b->c is the same as (a->b)->c
<0> SceneNode *node1 = (mSceneMgr->getRootSceneNode())->createChildSceneNode( "RobotNode" ); is this illegal?
<2> lol
<2> rdragon: it was me but lost conn and i can see my own messages, =)
<1> beginner__ - ah, ok ;)
<1> got 4 views on my resume so far... show me the money ;)
<3> :D
<3> I don't remember, are you working now?
<1> i am
<1> but it's more or less a dead project
<3> Oh, that game?
<1> really not learning anything by sticking around, and i'm sick of working at home
<1> yeah
<3> How's that coming, anyway
<2> rdragon: and a last question?
<1> it's harely moved in months
<1> barely
<3> Ah
<1> i feel like a one man team, heh
<1> and any time i try to innovate or do something the 'right way' I get shoved into "just make it work, we don't care if its good or not"
<1> "we just want something we can sell now"
<2> rdragon: it says scenenode *node1, shouldnt it be scenenode* node1?
<1> beginner__ it can be A*a; or A * a; or A* a; or A *a;
<3> nod
<3> They're running out of money
<2> rdragon: all same?
<1> yes
<3> Okay, shower time, talk to you later
<1> beginner__: yes
<2> rdragon: thanks
<1> JBlitzen - not sure if they are
<1> they will eventually, but they don't really want to spend anything to hire real workers
<3> nod
<1> looking around 'Volt' as well... as I understand it many of their jobs are contract work for MS... trying to get a feel for how this stuff works and see if there's anything interesting there
<1> well, by 'anything interesting' I guess I more mean 'something I'm qualified to apply for'
<3> Heh
<3> It'll all work out
<3> Shower time
<3> afk
<1> nod, seeya
<1> what does it mean when a job title says something like "software developer in test" ... "in test" == ?
<4> not enough context
<5> It means they're part of some sort of freakish experiment.
<5> Or English is a second language
<1> i don't know, "in test" is only mentioned in the job title, and it looks like an ordinary old position... other position titles liok like "software developer 1", "software developer 2"
<6> in test => in the testing role, i.e. software testing
<1> ah
<6> via writing of automated test cases, if its a developer role
<1> gotcha, thanks
<4> perhaps they mean in the test department
<1> yeah, i think so
<7> Hey there! Is anybody very familiar with parameter p***ing on the command line?
<1> yeah, you just type and voila
<7> :)
<7> ... using getopt()
<7> I can't simply use int argc, char** argv
<1> i think boost has a library that makes that stuff nice
<7> I can't use anything but getopt() :(
<7> Which is a pain if you p*** parameters without "-" in front of it
<1> well it's designed around using that, i think
<1> so yeah, i bet it'd be tough if you want to go against the grain there
<7> Hmm
<7> I can handle all the "-" parameters... but not the others
<1> it'd help if you explained what in heck you're trying to do
<7> lol
<7> Yeah, hold on
<7> I have to create a small console application to which I'm gonna p*** parameters...
<7> But, there is a specific set of parameters the app can take ... -v with an integer with it, and -a and -h
<7> So I have to use this : getopt(argc, argv, "hav:")
<7> Which tells getopt to accept "-h", "-a" and "-v some_integer" as parameters
<4> why do you want to use getopt()?
<8> yeah, why don't you do it manualy?
<4> is that some requirement your prof has given you?
<8> the param separation?
<7> I don't want to, I have to ... my teacher wants us to use getopt()
<4> /join #c main
<4> it's for that language that getopt was designed
<1> neat: http://www.ftponline.com/channels/net/reports/vslivesf/2006/ryan/
<1> video basically goes over the dev cycle of VS 2k5
<7> And yet my prof doesn't want us to use anything C ... lol
<4> what header is getopt() in?
<7> #include <getopt.h>
<9> <unistd.h>
<7> I think unistd.h is the C header
<10> unistd.h is the POSIX header.
<4> PM2 you should point out to your prof that all the standard C++ headers have NO .h in them
<10> getopt.h is a GNU header.
<4> now the entire C library was included in the C++ standard "by reference"
<7> I know :)
<9> who uses getopt ?
<7> Like <iostream> points to a C header
<4> PM2's prof wants his students to use it
<4> PM2 not necessarily
<4> it MIGHT on your system
<1> PM2 iostream is not a C header
<7> I know
<7> But my prof says it points to the C equivalent
<9> PM2, your prof is an idiot
<1> 'it' ?
<7> it = the <iostream> header
<4> PM2 it clearly does NOT "point to" a .h file in my system
<4> I just checked the file iostream
<1> there is no "C equivalent"
<4> my editor canNOT find a .h in it anywhere
<7> vawjrwrk : does it have a #include <...> in it?
<4> yes
<7> Which ones?
<4> <istream>
<7> That's the only one?
<7> Check istream's content
<4> PM2 I'm telling you it ain't gonnna be there, your prof is misinformed
<4> or lying to you
<4> your call
<7> Probably the first one :)
<7> Anyways
<7> Any ideas with my problem?
<4> I've never used getopt() and it's unlikely I ever will
<7> I can understand why, trust me! lol
<4> I'm told that boost has a nice program options library
<4> www.boost.org
<7> You can't control the damn thing!
<4> and it's for SURE that it's C++
<4> that's why I've alway written my own
<11> heh, getopt
<4> PM2 you can have my framework if you wish
<4> for options
<4> it's not all that great
<7> I'd like to use something else, but I unfortunatly can't :(
<7> I'm stuck with getopt()
<4> you can't even write your own, eh?
<7> And I fuc**ng don't know how to do it with getopt()
<7> Nope, I can't
<7> Well, I have to use getopt() AT SOME POINT in the app ...
Return to
#c++
or
Go to some related
logs:
madunna jump
#linux
Eyeless in Gaza at the mill with the slaves quote
#c++
#squid
tomcat mydsl
hi-lithium
#linux
ASUS M2V +linux
table create command of vpopmail users on mysql sever
|
|