| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Comments:
<0> hi
<0> Intel Macs "S
<0> :S
<1> yeah, that happened a while ago
<0> yeah but htey are getting releases this yr
<1> ah
<1> too bad they're not going to make OS X run on PCs
<1> or at least I don't think they are
<1> gotta figure out to run on the server machine
<0> on and on, its on and on, on and on, its on and on!
<2> <Koan> Xeones is reading you the true facts as written on the wall of his colon
<1> JB, ready for the superbowl tonight?
<0> superbowl :S
<2> Like I told someone else, I wouldn't cross the street to sit through that thing
<2> If a team I had a vested interest in was playing maybe
<2> But nah, not this year
<1> aw man, it's going to be a great game heheh
<1> of course, I'm from Pittsburgh :)
<0> BBL, watching SG1 Season 1 :P
<3> threat: this year being now?
<2> :D
<2> Nice, threat
<3> It's always funny when someone comes with some "smashing news" and everybody knew about it 3 months ago
<2> What?
<2> Oh, the mac thing
<4> hey im new i c++ i know nothing what i can reat for start learning it ?
<5> http://www.rudbek.com/books.html
<6> how can i catch - throw; ?
<5> try{ throw; } catch(...){ }
<5> (of course, you'll have to throw something)
<6> that results in terminate called without an active exception
<6> Abort
<6> can you throw nothing as in "throw;" and then catch that?
<5> you can re-throw from a catch block with throw; I don't think just throw; is legal
<6> it compiles
<6> http://rafb.net/paste/results/my00zz71.html
<5> does it get caught?
<6> no thats the problem
<6> it results in terminate called without an active exception
<6> Abort
<5> then throw SOMETHING
<6> this is a technical question. i understand that throwing something will fix it
<6> my question is can you catch a throw that throws nothing
<5> like I said, I don't think 'throwing nothing' is legal
<7> is throwing up legal?
<5> bjarne says "If a re-throw is attempted when there is no exception to re-throw, terminate() will be called.
<5> so, there's your answer. don't do it.
<6> thank you
<4> error C2100: illegal indirection , what is this??
<5> an error
<5> usually happens when you mess up in dereferencing pointers
<1> what is the type that you ar trying to dereference?
<4> i erase it
<5> just cut to the chase and show us the bad code
<4> im trying to make cmd("shutdown now")
<4> but i dont now any other commands or if this i right
<5> why are you trying to shut down the users computer?
<4> yea
<5> the question was 'why'
<4> ohh just to see how c++ works
<1> C++ can't do that
<5> well that has nothing to do with C++
<1> you have to use the Windows API
<8> hello all
<5> or whatever OS you're writing against
<8> #include <stdio.h>
<8> #include <winsock2.h>
<8> what version of c++ i need to compile this ?
<1> you'll need a windows compiler
<8> like ?
<5> stdio.h is part of the C library, not C++
<4> im using winxp + linux suse
<1> rdragon, if he's not on windows likely he can't shut the machine down at all :)
<1> not unless he's doing it as root
<5> cn28h well I thought "shutdown now" was a "*nix" shell command
<5> he probably is root
<1> shutdown is also a windows shell command iirc :)
<4> rooot?
<1> hehe
<8> to shutdown is just (in XP) /run shutdown -s
<8> or different shutdown options
<8> or in 98 /run rundll user,exitwindows
<4> lovetruthi for win 98 is system("rundll32.exe shell32.dll,SHExitWindow*** 13") i thing
<1> that's a pretty poor way to do it
<5> heh
<4> anw begone see ya
<1> if you want to force the user to reboot, just ask him to install an update
<5> or better yet, find a way to do what you're trying without having to have them reboot
<1> unfortunately this is not the popular choice :/
<8> anyone can tell me what version works with that #include ?
<1> which?
<1> winsock2.h?
<8> #include <stdio.h>
<8> #include <winsock2.h>
<8> those one :)
<1> probably MSVC++ or MingW
<8> exactly this way written :)
<5> what version of what, lovetruth ?
<4> if i want to shutdown one lan conection like other ppl pc with xp os i just run a cmd tsshutdn 0 /delay:0 /server:<servername-pcnumber> /powerdown
<5> please don't shut down my networks
<1> feel free to shut me down :)
<4> lool
<4> anw grg later ppl
<1> orl mko aletr man
<8> what version of c++
<8> or c whatever :)
<5> C++ doesn't have versions
<1> psst, you should be asking what comiler you need, ans I already answered you
<1> compiler, even
<8> well yes, what compiler :) but which compiler, microsoft NET, or visual studio, or ?
<5> visual C++ is a nice compiler
<5> and yes, i would recommend it
<5> http://msdn.microsoft.com/vstudio/express/visualC/default.aspx
<1> damn, I just figured out what I needed to in yacc with a 2 second modification and I've been looking for it for like 2 days :|
<5> hehe
<1> but I should get some sleep soon
<1> big night tonight :)
<0> [playing] Strapping Young Lad - Underneath The Waves [ ]3%, 125 kbps, 44 kHz, pos: 4539/6287 [Stereo]
<9> hi :)
<9> can somebody explain me the meaning of "Joint Review"? (problem with English)
<9> vawjr, please... =). You always help me :)
<10> WhiteVoid: review by multiple people.. maybe?
<9> Tamama thanks :). It's looks like true
<11> =)
<5> eXisten nobody cares ;)
<4> you ting so
<4> ;p
<4> thing*
<5> and you're not even away
<4> i im im going to electgric b*** leson
<12> well just go, we don't give a crap
<4> go get killed bro im out of here
<12> better
<11> rotfl
<5> hehe
<9> what is rotfl?
<11> rolling on the floor laughing
<9> =))
<11> :P
<5> [08:26] <4> nice operators you got here anw i will evade the ban later c ya
<5> look out for the evader ;)
<12> yeah he's on a shell
<11> eXisten is logged in as eXisten
<11> Easy to spot
<12> indeed..just di a whois
<12> aol/yahoo cash in on spam : http://www.realtechnews.com/posts/2632
<13> AOL/Yahoo users suddenly find their email accounts a lot less useful
<13> I can at least see it in the case of Yahoo - webmail is given away for free
<13> AOL is just retarded, people pay money for those
Return to
#c++
or
Go to some related
logs:
#chatzone
t
gentoo 200arc
#mirc
#chatzone
#c++
#javascript
#AllNiteCafe
kthm mirc
#windows
|
|