| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Comments:
<0> given the matrix
<0> it transponds it
<0> here is the code with fixed errors u guys mentioned
<0> http://www.noidea128.org/sourcefiles/16135.html
<0> erors are largrly removed
<1> easy to make, easy to crak
<0> i mean there are only few compared to the first code
<2> look at line 85
<2> DaLiJeGornjaTrougaona is screwed, too
<0> ok
<2> it will never return false
<2> and not all controls paths return a value
<2> and you're missing a closing }
<0> ok tnx for info
<2> and line 127
<0> damn i ****
<2> if(trougaona = true)
<2> bad
<2> that will always evaluate to true
<0> yea i understand
<0> ++
<0> ==
<3> think of == as "is equal"
<3> only works for english speakers I guess
<0> ok
<0> guys i fixed stuff u told me
<0> http://www.noidea128.org/sourcefiles/16136.html
<0> however there is still some mistake in lines 83 97 and 124
<0> 83 C:\WINDOWS\Desktop\zadatak1.cpp expected `,' or `;' before '{' token
<0> 97 C:\WINDOWS\Desktop\zadatak1.cpp expected primary-expression before "int"
<0> 97 C:\WINDOWS\Desktop\zadatak1.cpp expected `;' before "int"
<2> trans[j][i] = A[i][j];
<0> 124 C:\WINDOWS\Desktop\zadatak1.cpp expected `}' at end of input
<2> there's no such thing as 'trans'
<0> ok
<0> i fixed that
<0> http://www.noidea128.org/sourcefiles/16137.html
<0> ok guys here is the link
<0> http://www.noidea128.org/sourcefiles/16138.html
<0> the problem ocurs in line 77
<0> function DaLiJeGornjaTrougaona
<0> a function-definition is not allowed here before '{' token
<0> expected `,' or `;' before '{' toke
<0> also in line 105...when i name the main program "int main()"
<0> it tells me
<0> expected primary-expression before "int"
<0> expected `;' before "int"
<0> and in the end
<0> after return 0;
<0> when i close the main rporgam
<0> }
<0> it tells me
<0> expected `}' at end of input
<4> your code probably still is lacking some }
<4> You should indent consistently and you should use a text editor that supports kissing.
<3> i hate being used as a remote compiler
<5> I need ***istance
<5> ifstream ifs(FILENAME, ios::binary); uint64_t block; char block_hex[(BLOCK_BYTE + 1)]; ifs.read(block_hex, BLOCK_BYTE); block = strtoull(block_hex, NULL, 16); ofs.write((char*)&block, BLOCK_BYTE);
<5> ofstream ofs(FILENAME2, ios::binary); even
<5> my problem is when I do this I get the hex stored in the FILENAME2 (out stream) not the array I started with
<5> any ideas?
<6> fvcdbn h
<7> quite
<3> heh
<8> does anyone know what those binary things in an .obj file are ?how can I create those with c++ ? i'm trying to write an ***embler in c++
<3> coff or omf "things" iirc
<2> writing an ***embler? what in heck for?
<2> find information on the file format you want to write, then find information on how to encode each instruction
<3> and waste a loooong time
<2> what else is new around here
<8> I know the file format is coff , cause the ***embler i'm trying to make already exists on windows, and I'm doing it on linux, but is it the same coff which microsoft describe here ->http://support.microsoft.com/?id=121460 ?
<2> i thought it was "PE"
<2> oh, same thing
<2> yes, it is aral
<2> you're trying to ... what?
<2> linux has an ***embler
<2> it's called gas
<8> yeah, but this ***embler is for a ucontroller
<2> it's for some special hardware?
<2> why doesn't it have an ***embler yet?
<8> as I said above it has an ***embler on windows, and I'm doing one on linux
<2> ah
<2> well what does that have to do with PE/COFF ?
<2> that device executes PE executables?
<9> salut tlm
<8> well the existent ***embler on windows makes an .obj file which is in coff format ,
<2> what about a linker - writing one of those too?
<8> executables are ti-txt format
<8> so , what you're saying is that if I'm not writting a linker than I don't need an .obj file, right ?
<2> well what use is object files without a linker to make an executable out of them?
<8> ok, so if I'm not writting a linker than I should just make a listing file at the first p*** and than the ti-txt executable file ?
<2> if you're not writing a linker then just give up
<2> like I said - what use is object files without a linker to make an executable out of them?
<2> an ***embler doesn't make an executable
<8> it's probably no use without the linker ...
<2> right
<8> so I should skip the obj file ?
<2> what?
<2> when did I say that?
<8> i don;t get it
<2> you keep making things up
<2> what don't you get?
<8> so if it's no use having an .obj with no linker than why should I make the .obj file ?
<10> since when do I need a key to join #C ?
<2> the key is 'main'
<10> thx
<2> aral you didn't read what I said
<2> I said
<2> if you're not going to make a linker, then why bother writing an ***embler to output object files?
<2> it's an all or nothing sort of deal
<2> you can't execute object files
<2> and you can't create an executable without a linker
<2> and a linker has no purpose unless there's object files to process
<2> and there's no object files without an ***embler/compiler
<3> there are already a bunch of free asm/linkers for different uC out there
<3> base your stuff off one of those
<3> gcc has a cross compiler suite
<8> so ***uming I make an ***embler which only ***embles .asm made of only one file , than I don't need to make a linker and .obj file ,right ?
<3> oh god
<8> ok, so is the linker the one that relocates addresses from the sections of the .asm file ?
<2> aral: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linker
<3> wheres the god brigade today?
<3> fyi : http://www.shortpacked.com/
<11> hello
<11> How I can create an timer in C++
<11> ?
<11> like in Visual C++ or Delphi
<11> ...
<12> that would require use to know Visual C++ or Delphi
<12> *us
<3> with code usually
<11> ??
<13> what is the equivalant to istream in C, simply read?
<3> is boost::variant the right choice for differing structures to be treated similarly?
<3> a union would work but unions ****
<14> anyone here know how i can p*** a pointer to multi-dimensional array to function and use it there ?
<3> create a typedef for the type and p*** by reference...
<14> what you mean ?
<14> typedef char myarray[5][10]; ?
<3> i thought you might say that
<14> i got stuck with that problem for more than hour
<3> first question : why are you using arrays like that?
<14> well,i have a command line string,and i wants to code function that split the parameters and put them in array of char parms[x][512];
<14> where x=parm position
<14> and the [512] contain the parm string
<12> std::string man... std::string
<3> or vector
<12> or both!
<14> i dont wants to get stuff too much complex
<14> simple char would be fine
Return to
#c++
or
Go to some related
logs:
jeriko means
sexwithme
#php
#java
#linuxhelp
#apache
nahxi
#c++
#linux
CONTENTAL MICROWAVE
|
|