| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
Comments:
<0> If I ever need it, I'll know where to find it.
<1> sign an email account up to a whole ****load of "services"
<1> then just leave it to fill.
<0> Besides, I have about a dozen addresses.
<1> in fact... hell. write something to automate that. captcha breakers are still crap, but they're improving.
<2> bronaugh like no one ever tried it before?
<2> There used to be geocities website called hack me.
<2> The guy had posted his user/p*** on the website
<2> In the hopes tht someone will take the challange and make it a million user hits / day website
<2> challenge*
<1> haha
<1> one of the dudes I worked with back in 2000 wrote a CGI "feedback form" that mailed about 300 politicians when you clicked submit.
<1> they weren't pleased :P
<2> With that kind of feed, we hope that they died of malnutrition
<1> hah
<3> hi there, anyone knows about bhobj.dll here..? i have looked it up in google, and have not found any useful info on that..
<2> What do you need it for Felis?
<3> irr, i have serious suspicion on that file
<3> s
<3> about even
<2> Get that microsoft spyware thingi. I think they changed its name
<1> heh. I was talking to someone last night that's using that MS anti spyware crap.
<1> it works about as well as toilet paper does to staunch bleeding from your femoral artery.
<1> ie, barely at all.
<2> Well I am fine with it.
<3> irr,i have the bitdefender all in one..anyway, have you encountered problems with that file before..?
<2> But I guess I don't go to porn sites like Ashe.
<4> am pretty new to to visual c++, am working on dialogs, am trying to make a ccomboBox with options, can anyone direct me to some examples with comboboxes n controls ?
<5> ahhh home, home again
<5> I like to be here when I can
<3> k, thnx how about the adobe sgv viewer? anyone had problems with it before like your cpu running at 100% percent for hours? :)
<5> brb gotta take a poo on Felis
<6> Chaotic, I generally find that if you search for CComboBox MFC or CCombobox WTL (whichever you prefer) into google, you will get some good results
<4> ok thanks, will try that
<1> buttdefender? hmm
<6> Felis, yeah, its not very good...
<6> none are very good atm afaik
<1> Twister74: Moz stuff work OK?
<6> Not really
<1> what I've seen done with it seemed to work.
<1> but it was pretty minimal.
<3> twister74, i can swear you are right
<6> I have not tried the latest releases or alphas
<6> I tried like 8-10 months ago and neither were very good.
<1> ahh.
<1> well, Moz 1.5 here seems to work alright from what I've seen; given caveat above.
<6> I have not tried that one so...
<1> Firefox. whatever.
<1> I should probably use the right name; then people will know what I'm talking about.
<6> it helps.
<3> hell ! adobe sgv viewer binds to ie and your cpu runs at 100% percent as long as you do not close all ies
<1> you're using IE...
<1> oh well.
<3> bron, i use all .. believe me. but i am near a verdict like never using ie again ;)
<2> I still use IE. I don't know why..
<3> irr, beware of that sgv viewer than
<3> then..
<1> at this point FF is superior in many respects.
<2> I don't have it
<1> still crappier/slower/worse memory usage.
<1> but lower security vuln count, and less nasty
<2> bronaugh its 3/4 years newer
<2> so obviously
<1> nah, it was better 2 years ago.
<2> It was in beta then
<3> bron , how bout opera?
<1> Mozilla suite wasn't.
<1> Felis: haven't used it much. seemed pretty good when I used it.
<3> opera has indeed the look of a real opera stage ,to me
<1> p*** me that glue you're sniffing.
<3> damned ie is a magnet for every hacker as far as it seems
<6> worse memory usage, slower, crappier?
<3> bron , its a japanese one..
<1> Twister74: crappier rendering quality in some circumstances.
<1> Twister74: memory usage is not pretty. and it's not fast.
<6> In my experience, Firefox follows the standards more closely than IE
<6> Memory usage is because it caches pages
<1> yup. that's definitely true.
<6> fast, I have not noticed a speed difference
<1> no, memory usage is because they're using a GC with C++... for one thing.
<1> Twister74: do you run a processor that is slower than 1GHz?
<6> no
<1> bingo.
<6> Well, for anyone running a 'normal' cpu, it runs fine heh
<1> my P3m-866 -is- a normal CPU:P
<6> no way, its what a mammoth is to an elephant
<6> an old, smelly, hairy beast that went extinct.
<1> except that my CPU's consuming less than 5 watts while yours is heating your office.
<6> Well maybe my office needs heated.
<1> (ok, full out the thermal design power is 7W)
<2> g'night folks
<6> And my productivity is 5 times greater
<6> at work anyhow.
<3> congrats to you both
<1> 5 times greater I highly doubt.
<6> at work, I guarantee
<1> if I really need to do something intensive I send it off to the real server.
<1> things happen quick on dual 2GHz AMD64
<6> I spend 40% of my time waiting ofr the computer
<1> I spend... almost none of my time waiting for computer.
<6> I have a 2.8C Intel at work with only 512mb of ram though... it needs another 512mb of ram then it would be sufficient
<1> yeah, laptop here has 512M -- but I run linux on it with almost no GUI (ratpoison)
<1> HD is definitely the slowest thing in it.
<6> I have a 2200+ Runing Raid0 here, and I still wish the HD was faster at times
<6> WD800JBs... used to be good... not so much anymore.
<1> yeah, I've got 2 of those in RAID1 in my personal server.
<1> pretty quick.
<6> and my other computer I plugged into the wrong UPS port and it went down today after a power outage :(
<1> heh
<6> and its about as slow as I venture to use as a desktop pc... 1700+
<1> lol
<1> you know.. I can kind of see that with WinXP
<6> Ubuntu on that one
<1> P3-550 here at work is not fun to use with XP.
<1> my laptop? it's great.
<1> (with debian)
<6> Ubuntu is not bad on the 1700
<1> Ubuntu with Gnome was pretty slow on the P166 I put it on initially.
<1> -that- was funny. took about 3 minutes to start gnome.
<6> heh
<1> after it started it wasn't bad.
<1> usable, at the very least.
<6> yeah I am using Gnome as well... even htough I kinda like the new KDE better
<1> I use Gnome/KDE on things I don't care about and that I invite other people to use.
<1> I also tend to leave those with QWERTY keyboard for same reason.
<1> my own machine? heh. let's just say I have good local security :P
<6> paranoid a bit?
<1> nah.
<6> what keyboard do you use?
<1> incidental security. dvorak keyboard labelled qwerty plus a keyboard-oriented wm.
<1> touch typing is mandatory.
<7> what's wrong with this: x1,x2, ay1, y2 are all int, slope is float. I'm not getting a correct value for slope: slope = ((y2-ay1)/(x2-x1));
<1> you need to cast the vals before the division.
<1> slope = (float)(y2 - y1) / (float)(x2 - x1)
<7> fantastic! thanks
<8> you really only need one cast
<7> that saved me a heap of coffee and frustration!...
<1> yeah, it'll implicitly upcast one.
<9> and it shouldn't be a c-cast
<8> static_cast<float>(...) :)
<1> rdragon: I don't know about C++ casts, so... I'm going to use what I know :P
<9> how about you learn C++ ?
<7> spose no-one knows anything about midpoint algorithm and opengl?
<1> I just did learn some. now what's the advantage of that static_cast thing?
<1> Graveling: happen to have my graphics textbook with me right now.
<9> 'that static_cast thing' is one of the C++ casts
<1> and what's dynamic_cast by contrast?
<9> books here: www.rudbek.com/books.html
<7> bronaugh: cool, you around for long? I should try to learn it myself without help, but if I get stuck I might ask you if thats ok
<1> Graveling: I'll be around for an hour or so anyhow. don't want to promise the moon, but I'll probably be around.
<7> k, thanks
Return to
#c++
or
Go to some related
logs:
big city life techno remix
encraption c++
#windows
fun_girl
gorge wassouf
#linux
#MissKitten
armageddon raggot mp3
#chatzone
#AllNiteCafe
|
|