| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Comments:
<0> You can help yourself by reading the channel topic first.
<1> okay sometimes u need to ask for permission...
<1> does anybody know from where i can get a prog that byp***es shared files?
<2> http://www.libsdl.org/extras/win32/common/opengl-devel.tar.gz
<3> thanks
<4> what does "byp***es shared files" mean?
<0> How is that a C++ related question?
<2> what is your star sign?
<1> lol where's that related to?
<0> cynic_X_: Bjarne
<2> _m_, bjarne is a kind of animal in finnish?.
<4> no, it's a water bearer
<4> or maybe Bjarne means virgin
<0> cynic_X_: not all star signs are animals.
<5> With such a look he must certainly be a virgin
<4> lololololooolol
<5> It looks like binary with this font
<2> I would use the programming language credited to a virgin.
<2> anally virgin that is.
<1> lol where's that related to? _m_
<0> calc Bjarne
<6> Bjarne = God. See also: TC++PL, D&E, http://www.research.att.com/~bs/homepage.html.
<2> you know, he changed that pic some time last september
<2> looks much older now
<7> http://permanent.nouvelobs.com/photos/20060130.OBS2203.jpg
<7> if u had a sudoku to make, you would use stl ?
<8> vawjrwrk, I solve it by making a shared library from the object files I got whe compiling the C src
<8> so now I just point to where the *.so file is
<8> s/solve/solved
<7> looks much simple to use an array of array :/
<4> corstan if you insist... I'd learn how to use make myself
<4> it will save you a LOT of typing
<4> and mistakes
<8> I am using a shell script
<8> ./make.sh
<5> And that's stupid
<4> I heard you the first time
<7> are makefile compatible with all the compilers ?
<8> I will move on to makefile later on the road
<7> codewarrior to vs2005
<4> they have nothing to do with compilers
<7> etc
<7> ohh
<4> they have to do with make
<5> Codewarrior integrates into Visual Studio anyway
<4> corstan your insistance that YOU know best how and what to learn is folly
<8> I am not insisting anything
<8> I hear you brother
<4> and you ignore me because you "know better"
<5> Because he made a l33t shell script
<5> And it took him 2 weeks to write it
<8> eh, no :)
<4> how'd the game go?
<9> The guy wasn't there... I played against a MUCH weaker player, and lost :((
<4> ouch
<5> Maybe he was not that weak then
<9> Well, he used to be like 1700 I think - but now his rating is really really low :/
<9> Maybe he had his day today. I definitely didn't have my day. One of the problems was that because his rating is so much lower, I have the feeling that I HAVE to win. So, every move he plays I think: What is wrong with that move (it has to be wrong)... and I was preparing myself in the opening to start a king attack as soon as the opening was finished, without even LOOKING at what chances he had to attack.
<9> At one point I castled, and then he could 'attack'... play a knight threating a fork on my two rooks by taking the pawn on f7. I couldn't defend that pawn :(
<9> That came of nowhere :/
<9> Worse, I couldn't move the pawn forward, because then he'd win the rook anyway. So I had to move BOTH rooks to files I wasn't concentrating my attack on AND lose that pawn.
<9> After that I had nothing anymore.
<9> I could still have won in theory - by just defending well enough and hit him back in the end game or something... but at some point I proved to really not have my day and simply gave away a rook.
<9> I guess I deserved to lose today.
<9> (it didn't help either that some old guy was breathing in my neck at the moment of the blunder - I was being pretty irritated by it)
<10> Chess, I ***ume?
<9> yes
<5> Oh I thought it was football
<3> lol
<10> U sUk
<9> Well, thank God he doesn't have 1400 as he said.. his current rating is 1546 I see here.
<5> Maybe it's after beating you :D
<4> so you lost what, maybe 40 on your rating?
<4> or wasn't it a sanctioned match
<9> I don't know how much.
<9> not 40 I think... maybe 20
<9> Well, back to programming.
<9> I'm writing a cl*** 'Node' that will represent nodes in a graph.
<4> have you looked at the boost graph library?
<9> It will be a base cl*** for different types of things.
<9> No, didn't - didn't know it had one.
<4> there's even an A-W book on it
<4> http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0201729148/sr=1-1/qid=1138922995/ref=pd_bbs_1/103-9266302-2727053?%5Fencoding=UTF8
<3> Does anyone know where i can get opengl libraries for MinGW32 ?
<11> Morning
<5> Bob77: it didn't come with it?
<5> Like -LC:\MinGW\lib -lopengl32
<3> yeah, used the wrong switch
<3> thanks
<3> how about winsock ?
<11> is opengl really that open ?
<5> Maybe you could check what you have in \lib
<3> what does undefined reference to winMain@16 mean ?
<12> hmm
<5> Bob77: you have no WinMain, I suppose
<7> can we give values in a .hpp ?
<7> int i = 124124;
<7> :<
<5> A .hpp is just like a .cpp
<5> But if you include it in multiple .cpp's, you'll have int i = 124124; in multiple places
<7> ohh i tought it was interface java kind of
<5> :/
<7> :\
<7> thx
<9> vawjrwrk: I wish amazon would sell .ps files online of those books... I don't feel like ordering it and waiting two weeks, but I might be tempted to buy it online when I can get it immediately.
<13> why .ps and not .pdf
<5> Run: it's not on amazon.de?
<14> PS is more flexible
<7> why .pdf and not .hml
<14> And can easily be made into PDF
<13> isn't it old hat
<14> Because HTML ****s as a presentation language
<14> Still the standard format
<7> not html ^^
<13> many of the .ps papers I download look like poo compared to pdf...perhaps I need to get better viewers
<7> i too dl .ps that look like poo
<7> with ghostscript
<5> Many .pdfs look like poo too
<5> It's more about the guys who made it than the format
<13> alright
<7> anyways, how can i test if tab[i][j] is empty
<13> what's tab
<7> char[][]
<5> It'll never be empty
<7> cause i need to put some '*' if not a number
<3> if i am doing a batch file compile.bat can i say set GCC=g++ and then do %GCC% file.c
<3> ?
<7> if (! (tab[i][j] > 0) { insert the shizzle } ?
<11> wtf
<11> I hit an unknown key sqeuence that closed down IRC
<11> either that or I got a segfault
<10> Alt-f4?
<3> i have a 20 .cpp files and i want to make a Makefile to compile those files, is there a way to do it without using 20 rules ?
<11> JBlitzen, nope
<5> %.cpp
<3> just insert one line like that ?
<5> %.cpp: dowhateveryouwant
<5> Well, more like %.obj in fact
<5> %.obj: %.cpp
<5> Then the compile line
<5> With $@ and $?
<11> .cpp.o:
<11> $(CC) -c $< ?
<5> ...
<3> ok, i will try it
<5> %.obj: %.cpp
<5> gcc -c $@ $?
Return to
#c++
or
Go to some related
logs:
#linux
#linux
tomcruse
#london
2000's skirts
#AllNiteCafe
#linuxhelp
#networking
lok'amir il romathis what does it mean
listerine is cheaper
|
|
