@# Quotes DB     useful, funny, interesting





Google
 
Web www.quotesdb.info
Undernet  |  EFnet  |  Quakenet  |  Freenode  |  Dalnet  |  Ircnet  |  Galaxynet
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12



Comments:

<0> hi
<1> Deathmaster working on your long math stuff, eh?
<0> if I use: char *filename as a function argument in a C code
<2> yup
<0> and I am reusing that C code in a C++ program, can I use:
<0> const std::string& filename ?
<0> or am I forced to use char
<0> C code: fparse_n_nnz(ascii_ifile,&n,&nnz); where char *ascii_ifile = "foo.in";
<0> C++ code: const std::string& filename; fparse_n_nnz(filename,&n,&nnz);
<0> any comments?
<3> corstan get a book already
<1> ewwww, why &n and &nnz ?
<0> to be read into
<0> call by reference
<1> ever hear of references?
<1> no, that's call by pointer



<0> ok
<1> you've learned too much C, and not learned it well
<4> mm
<3> that's not going to work anyway, especially if fparse_blah is expecting a char* to write into
<0> remembering K&R use of that swap function yes
<4> vawjr: you p*** by refrence even if its going to be modified?
<3> or rather, a char* to read the filename from
<1> especially if it's going to be modified
<1> const reference if it's not
<0> it not going to be modified
<0> just a filenae
<0> name
<3> corstan what is fparse_n_nnz ?
<4> vawjr: I'm conflicted on that... part of me doesent like that you can't tell from the call whats p***ed in will be modified
<0> parsing an ASCII file to get two number from it
<0> integers
<3> who wrote it?
<0> me
<3> what in hell for?
<0> ?
<0> I told you
<3> file >> some_int >> some_other_int;
<5> corstan, whenever a parameter that is p***ed by reference will not be modified by the function, you should make it const.
<0> yes, but I am trying to reuse my C code
<3> what C code?
<3> that function?
<0> yes, that's from a utils.c and utils.h
<0> extern "C" { #include utils.h }
<3> well throw the function away, it's useless
<3> not sure why you would want to code in C using a C++ compiler
<0> rdragon, it works in C, so I don't think so
<1> TechRaven correct and I understand your concerns but you can sure as hell tell from the signature of the function you're calling
<1> corstan what the hell is utils.h ?
<0> rdragon not sure why you would want to code in C using a C++ compiler <-- who said I am going to use gcc to compile *.cpp ?
<3> I don't know, I sure didn't
<0> vawjrwrk, a collection various file operation function used in the C library
<0> parsing ascii and binary files containing numbers from matrices
<1> quit using FILE* and use streams
<3> corstan the C++ library HAS a bunch of file-related functionality
<0> I know that
<3> so throw your C crap away and learn C++
<2> LOL "C crap" =))
<3> or just stick to C
<0> the point is that I am trying to reuse the C code in a C++ library so that I won't spend the next two months tinkering with this
<1> ****s
<3> but don't create a dilipidated mish-mash of C and C++
<0> I am not going to be an expert so that's alright
<5> No, it's not all right, and that's a lame excuse.
<1> why do you think it would take you 2 months to fix it?
<1> did you write it that poorly?
<3> you're going to spend the next 2 years un-learning C, down that road
<5> Doing something correctly has nothing to do with being an expert.
<1> apparently NOT to learn C++
<4> if he/she is working off a large code base... maybe it uses the old functions, can't always go rewrite all of that, but if your writing new code, you shouldnt defintly straw away if possible
<4> there is an insane C library here, and it almsot forces you to write C style code, I often find myself writing C++ wrappers to deal with the C layer underneath
<3> corstan is this work for a job?
<1> why are we even talking to a person who hangs out in hackphreak?
<0> I did the matrix problem with C
<1> corstan #hackphreak +#c #c++



<0> and now I have to rewrite this in C++
<1> then REWRITE it
<0> but I have the option of using thin wrappers
<0> with minimum C++ code
<3> what for? just stay with C
<0> but I am of course going to get involved with cl***es
<0> so anyways I am getting my hand dirty
<3> corstan who is making you do this work?
<0> hands
<3> is this for a job?
<0> rdragon, no!
<3> then do it correctly
<0> vawjrwrk, @#C++/CLI @#C++ @#vc++ <-- great
<3> you've been hanging around here for awhile now, and you haven't seemed to make much progress in learning C++... i suggest you get a book and do it right
<0> I did exercises in C++ before
<0> then I had to do a project with clean C
<3> irrelevant
<0> so now I am back to C++
<0> learning as I go
<3> you could do that, or you could get a book and actually learn
<6> corstan: that #hackphreak you're on, is that related to 2600?
<0> it's a channel, and people discuss security issues even though I am not into it
<3> heh
<0> several of them are good at scripting and coding, so it's a good channel to learn stuff
<6> That's not what I asked.
<0> python/perl and compiled languages
<5> My research has shown that while certain of its denizens may be shady, the channel itself is mostly aboveboard.
<0> Run, not sure any of them are related to that magazine or hax0r
<7> ok I'll ask then
<7> I tried creating one but get an runtime error that points to this function member of WINSPLIT.CPP file: http://www.noidea128.org/sourcefiles/15905.html
<6> Ah, wrong answer... the right anser was: "I don't know what 2600 is" :p
<7> I tired creating... a cSplitterwnd
<0> Run, please enlighten us instead of throwing off a link to Wikipedia
<5> http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=%23hackphreak&defid=609600
<7> brb gotta smoke
<5> That's pretty accurate.
<7> lol
<3> pfloyd34 maybe the row,col is invalid
<6> corstan: I'll enlighten you: I wasn't really talking to you, I was thinking about "<1> why are we even talking to a person who hangs out in hackphreak?", and now made up my mind.
<3> heh
<6> He has the same rating as me... though on ICC he's a lot stronger (in rating points).
<7> ok thanks rdragon lemmie try
<6> Turn out that (I can see his game history on ICC) he prefers the Trompowsky Attack...
<3> I hate how MFC is so intolerant of bad data
<6> I suppose nobody here is a Trompowsky Attack guru?
<1> Run what's your rating?
<6> Not very high, heh.
<6> At the moment 1815
<1> that's the old USCF rating
<6> but well, I'm rising - I haven't played for a long time and when I started a 1.5 years ago they let me start at 1600 :/
<8> ICC?
<8> chess?
<6> My TPR is 1850 now though... so, I'll be happy if I can reach 1900 within the next 12 months, and I think that 2000 is my all-time ceiling: my memory isn't good enough and I lack the ability to visualize a chess board (I play completely based on one-ply deep patterns and positional strategy)
<1> ah, one of the best comments I ever had about my playing was from a guy with a 2390 rating who said he liked to play me because I scared the hell out of him during play. I always had him in "panic" mode thinking I saw somthing he didn't
<6> Some patterns are patterns in which you can give mate in 6 of course, but still: I can't SEE the moves - I just know what the next move is when it's my turn, heheh.
<6> heheh
<6> With a rating of 1400 that is unlikely :p
<6> 300 points difference on this logarithmic scale means you can win 10 out of 10 being drunk, usually.
<6> I some times talk to people who have a rating of 2400+ and it is clear I can NEVER reach that: they all remember every game they ever played. If you ask a question, they often put on a position on the board (in the MIDDLE of the game!) with the words - yeah, I had a position like this once in 1984 ...
<0> what could this mean: test.cpp:10: error: expected constructor, destructor, or type conversion before '=' token
<0> test.cpp:10: error: expected `,' or `;' before '=' token
<3> it could mean your code is wrong
<0> heh, besides that
<3> why won't you just show the bad code?
<3> i'm can't enumerate every possible circumstance that error might pop up for
<3> besides your code being wrong? compiler bug
<9> corstan, perhaps you called operator= outside a function
<6> corstan: If you are interested in errors, I can show you an average compile error as I get them usually...
<0> yes, outside main()
<0> Run, my life is full of errors, so got my own list :)
<9> corstan, that's forbidden
<3> corstan - post the code, geez


Name:

Comments:

Please enter the result of the sum 63 + 46 (to avoid spam):






Return to #c++
or
Go to some related logs:

#php
#chatzone
how to remove scandisk for win2k3
421 Failed to create data connection socket
#linux
#php
male chatmate
#mirc
organicchemistry
#c



Home  |  disclaimer  |  contact  |  submit quotes