| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Comments:
<0> =(
<0> it gives me cancer, but feels good when I finish them
<1> can't waite for those quantum computers to come out
<0> I can wait.
<2> You might be waiting quite some time, and be rather disapointed if they appear
<1> cold fusion and girlfriend would be nice too, but dreams are dreams
<3> we don't even have any good lanugages to handle simple parallelism yet... what you gonna write in for teh quantum computer
<4> Has anyone here programmed a dot map before? There are some considerations that are throwing me for a loop.
<1> binary search
<4> Like the curve of the long/lat lines.
<1> in O(1)
<3> BillMurray aren't you looking at a groundhog today?
<2> And if search an algorithm excists Bob77, what would it actually get you?
<4> haha I didn't even think of that.
<4> I am a different billmurray but I do like the actor.
<3> I have to remind myself everytime I see that, that you went to high-school w/ my sister
<4> I'll never look at an undistorted dot map the same...
<5> error C2664: 'const Client &std::vector<_Ty>::at(__w64 unsigned int) const' : cannot convert parameter 1 from 'Client' to '__w64 unsigned int'
<5> whats this error usually mean ?
<6> wrong parameter p***ed to at()
<5> do i p*** vector.at(iterator) or (*iterator)
<7> at() gets an index, iirc
<7> at() is a range checked version of operator[]
<5> but vector::iterator is ?
<5> :)
<0> vector::iterator s are not range checked, but you can check them against vector::begin() and vector::end()
<6> just as you can with vector::size() for indices right?
<0> that's not a one to one substitute. Other than that, yes.
<3> if you have an iterator *iterator will get you the element
<3> what are you trying to do?
<4> oh. mercator projection.
<6> when you declare function throws exception_type -- will there be a compiler error if you don't do the try{}catch(exception_type) block?
<5> get the element yes
<3> 8iter
<8> melfar, no. C++ doesn't have checked exceptions
<3> damnnit *iter
<3> melfar exception declarations don't do what people originaly thought and are generally considered worse than useless
<9> whats the syntax for being a friend of templated function in another namespace?
<3> TechRaven likely impossible
<9> namespace test { namespace bob { template <typename A> Foo(A &test, Bar &bar) { bar.bar = 0; } } } cl*** Bar { friend .... private: int bar; };
<9> vawjr: impossible?
<3> I think there's some problem with trying to make templated functions friend unless they're completely specified
<3> not sure why
<9> I know the namespace
<3> do you also know the template type?
<10> many compilers are not fully compliant in the template/friend area
<1> wow, this MinGW is sweet
<3> glad you like it
<3> does it come w/ gnumake?
<1> it has some kind of make mingw32-make
<0> it does, msys comes with a better version
<1> what is msys exactly ?
<3> msys has a better make than gmake??
<3> that's difficult to believe
<0> no, it has gnu make, a better version of it =P
<3> Bob77 type mingw32-make --ver
<3> oh
<1> 3.80
<1> gnu make
<3> 20 years ago
<0> Bob77, exactly? it is an rxvt or sh using bash
<0> a port for win32
<3> Bob77 that's what I have on this system here at work
<0> the msys folks say that their patched version clears up some bugs gnu make has when interacting with msys
<5> vector<Client>::const_iterator iter; //vector<Client>::iterator iter;
<5> whats the difference between thoses ?
<0> the first iter can't alter contents of the vector it is iterating through
<7> one is const, one isn't
<5> thx
<0> one of them is mandatory for a const member function which iterates through that vector data member
<5> but if i copy the iter to another pointer, could i modify the value with the other ?
<3> toast if you want to lie to the compiler you can do anything
<3> and how are you going to "copy the iter to another pointer" ?
<9> vawjr: no, I don't know the template tpy
<9> e
<5> hehe just asking
<5> probably *itertemp = iter;
<3> TechRaven I thinik that leads to some difficulties since foo<a>(args) is a different function from foo<b>(args)
<3> probably isn't a valid type
<7> and might take different args, too
<5> vector<Client>::iterator itertemp = iter;
<9> vawjr: well that blows
<7> what's 'iter'? a const_iterator? that probably wouldn't work, then
<3> TechRaven they're _different_
<9> vawjr: so? you should be able to make all of em friends heh
<7> crap... we had to read this 'article' for cl***... I wish I knew it was 22 pages long, heh
<9> didn't bother till the last minute rd?
<7> nod
<3> TechRaven making a family of functions friends would effectively allow anyone to access your privates
<9> yea, i'm pretty open like that ;)
<3> then why not just make it public to start
<11> hi vawjr
<3> lo, isc
<9> vawjr: because its a very specific set of functions that can gain access... its for boost serialization, I don't wanna know about boost serialization inside the cl***, the variables shouldnt be public....
<7> maybe you should just explicitly state each specialization ?
<3> all I'm saying is taht if you do sucessfully do friend foo<>() ...... _I_ have access to all the private variables
<5> codeTemp = iter.getCode();
<3> rdragon some compilers don't handle even that, I found
<7> mmm
<3> toast not likely to work
<5> lol thats what i tought
<3> or maybe I just didn't write stuff correctly
<3> toast why don't you tell us what you're trying to do instead of code that doesn't work
<3> rdragon it MAY work for TechRaven though
<12> http://www.marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2006/01/shopping_in_197.html
<3> the current catalog doesn't have rifles
<1> is there any operation similar to foreach in command prompt ?
<7> "in command prompt" <-- what does that mean?
<1> cmd.exe in windows
<7> what do you want to do with 'foreach' ?
<3> maybe, what are you needing to do?
<13> You mean like in a batch script?
<1> i have a bunch of .cpp files and i want to compile them into .o files
<1> using gcc
<7> gcc *.cpp -c ?
<1> that will work ?
<1> first time i see that
<7> did you try it?
<3> g++ maybe a better choice
<0> gcc will compile, g++ will link properly
<3> cynic_X_ ah...it's a shame they didn't teach gcc about whatever option it is that g++ supplies
Return to
#c++
or
Go to some related
logs:
livecd mount sata drive raid
#london
#AllNiteCafe
il-mohriet
pet assembly language
#AllNiteCafe
What future yippie leader was the first male cheerleader at brandeis
#c++
#linuxhelp
#AllNiteCafe
|
|