| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2
Comments:
<0> .dasm 0x6312 <0> .dasm 6321 <0> damn.. where's wisebot? <1> dead <1> i'm reintalling the server it was on <1> hum, i can probably spawn it here temporarly <0> :) <0> .dasm 6321 <2> Deathmaster: <2> ------------------------------------------------- <2> 00000000 6321 arpl [ecx],sp <2> ------------------------------------------------- <1> ?? test <2> voider: TEST -> Test For Bit Pattern <3> hello :) <4> hi
<0> http://www.nomorepasting.com/paste.php?pasteID=57093 i have that piece of code that should get itself patched so basicly at this stage it should reach line 25 only once.... but it doesn't! it never reaches line 25. why is that? pls help <4> have you tryed to debug that code ? <0> that's why i put those msgboxes there in the first place :)) <0> it appears only the first one <0> the second one never shows up, but it should <4> 0EB04h is opcode for what ? <0> jmp $+4 <4> try to debug with olly <4> it gives you some error ? <4> maybe the section is not writable <4> the section witch includes that code in memory <0> no, the section is writeable <0> i patched code in some other places and it worked just fine <5> do what he said... debug the code <4> give me that exe to debug it... <4> upload somewhere <4> one second.. <4> to enable DCC <6> danger meter is acting crazy <0> LOL <0> ewick: did you take a look at the code? have any idea? <6> I don't write or read asm just for fun <6> and that's hardly asm <0> lol why is it hardly asm? <6> it's just stupid HLA from the looks <0> HLA = ? <7> hla is ***embler just as much as masm is <6> high level ***embly.. <6> yeah, right <7> its just fancy compile time macro tricks <7> just like masm <0> lol how is that high level?? 'cause i used used a stupid macro? <7> if you're going to bitch about hla, then why dont you bitch at similar things in masm <7> they are requirewd in neither ***embler <6> it's just a lame excuse not to use C <0> anyway... it doesn't matter how the code appears to be, the question is why isn't that thing working properly? <5> try to debug it to find out.. like everybody else does <6> yeah <6> line 9 is a pretty obvious reason why execution would never reach line 25 <4> Deathmaster: i think I saw where is the problemm <0> ? <4> Deathmaster: you are patching in a wrong place <4> --before <4> ADD DWORD PTR SS:[EBP-C],EAX <4> ADD BYTE PTR DS:[EAX],AL <4> JMP SHORT 00401050 <4> --after <4> ADD DWORD PTR SS:[EBP-C],EAX <4> ADD BL,CH <4> JMP SHORT 00401050 <4> that's what your code does... <4> I think you want to patch that JMP.. <0> yup <0> oh wait a minute <0> i think i'm patching the wrong thing <4> i know that <4> Deathmaster.. try to learn to use a debugger... for example Olly <0> LOL i forgot to invert the bytes... damn that was stupid <0> i should have ***igned 04EB, not EB04 <6> Leona_K! <8> hello Ewick
<0> anyway... thank you very much xph <6> whaddup <4> any time Deathmaster <8> ...? not much, and you? <6> same old <9> Phone booth! I love this movie. <9> Hug me, squeeze me, caress me and kiss me! <10> sorry i read kick me <9> Haha <9> I thought that French people where better lovers. <9> were <11> they make lover better <9> Yes, it's because you're accent. <12> accent? <9> The way they talk. <12> ok <9> Utterkins: isn't that word correct? <13> "It's because of your accent" <9> God, sorry. <9> I sometimes confuse where with were and you're with your. <9> Well, and I forgot the "of" completely :-p <12> french accent isnt that hot <10> and bitch with beach <13> Don't worry about it, _exe <13> Just helping out. <9> Thank you :_D <9> http://ocw.mit.edu is pretty nice, Computer science section has a lot of interesting documents. <12> bored <14> Any opinions for Linux 32bit on AMD64 for which of Gnu AS , NASM or YASM is the fastest ***embler ? <15> Actually.. <14> yes.. <15> YASM is a complete rewrite of NASM, although I yet do not know if those guys have already achieved their willing of parsing NASM's syntax decently <14> I know that, but i don't know if it affects in any way speed <16> I'm not sure how the ***embler would affect the speed of your executable <14> i'll be more specific <14> in the ./configure script of mplayer there is an option that lets you decide which ***embler to use..that's why I am asking <16> I doubt it'll make any significant difference <9> At least no speed difference, maybe size difference. <15> It won't make any. <14> the only part that interests me is speed no matter the size of the executable <15> I thought it was task-dependant on the very first <14> ill stick with as for the time.. <15> Stubborn greeks. <15> You know, they're quite way more complex whenever they have to decide wether offering you one of their vessels or not. <9> Mikkey! <15> ;-) <9> How are you Mikkey ? <9> http://sinfulshirts.com/images/largeviews/71.gif <17> hey peo <17> people <9> a-lee-n <4> hello <17> ;) <17> hey _exe.file <17> how are y0ou doing? <9> I'm okey. Missing a friend that's travelling. <9> You? <17> I am just drunk <9> :_O <9> People get drunk in India? <17> lol <17> yea <9> Haha <9> Did you go out? <17> yea, along with friend <17> nobody at home. so, i went for drinking :P <9> Did you get any chick? <17> its not Pub, just Bar. You dont get chick in Bar though. <9> Oh, I see. <9> You don't have gf, do you? <17> Nope, i dont have <17> and i dont like girl who drinks and smokes anyway :P <9> Heh, the same with me. <9> Smoking looks really awful.
Return to
#asm or Go to some related
logs:
papusica mythweb compile ffmpeg mp3 sysctl +ubuntu +File size limit exceeded you my secret pasion and I have no
#AllNiteCafe Leon Uris novel deals with the Russian capture of Berlin cosmick wars #chatzone #linux fuctionalist
|
|