| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2
Comments:
<0> 'goto' from within switch case works ok?
<0> (to label which is not a case)
<0> err
<0> yes
<1> heya
<0> hello
<2> yes it does.
<0> ok
<0> bye
<1> night
<3> how can I create array of arguments for execv? can I allocate it dynamically? who we clean this afterwards? it should even be cleaned?
<4> if exec succeeds it won't return, and all the memory will be free'd.
<5> hi
<5> i'm leaving bye everybody
<6> .o(you're doing that on all ircnet channels?)
<5> me?
<6> are you reading my thoughts?
<7> lol
<0> now see what you did - he quit
<6> I'm such a meanie.
<0> yeah
<8> s/mea/wee/
<0> that too
<0> hmm that wasn't necessary
<9> hi
<9> maybe anybod can help me with an example for piping in c ? :)
<10> GO_AWAY
<10> Channel is closed on sunday
<9> hm why?
<10> get a life
<9> oh sorry
<10> tru C l33t coder, have hangover at sundays
<10> and gr*** in pipe
<9> ROFL
<7> ...
<10> :)
<11> *yawn*
<11> c has no pipes ... that's os dependent
<11> and i made a lib for that :)
<12> vandaal: but what are you doing here then? ;-)
<11> mergest: http://www.pipapo.org/iowiki/PasteBin/CallsystemExamples
<10> domen: mhm, annoying others becouse my hangover
<11> http://www.pipapo.org/cgi-bin/archzoom.cgi/chth@gmx.net--2004/callsystem--cehteh--0.1--patch-16 there is the code
<9> :)
<11> and it is GPL/BSD dual licensed i just didnt mention that in the files
<11> and not yet completely finished .. win32 stuff lacks few things if you enhance it send me patches
<9> no I'm on a linux distr.
<10> oh linux sux..
<10> :)
<9> :P
<11> well that small lib does quite more than just piping
<0> mergest, do you understand pipe manpage?
<11> you can use that either as example, or maybe it is actually what you need
<9> it's a good begin, but my english is so bad an i only need a small example how it work when i take a string into a programm ^^
<0> did you read man popen
<11> you need to be soemwhat careful against buffer overund
<9> for example: ./programm "MYSTRING IS HERE"
<0> heh
<11> where does that need a pipe?
<0> that has nothing to do...
<0> right
<9> yes my really problem is that i got a prgramm that piping a multiline string in programm2 /.prgroamm1 | ./programm2
<11> int main(int argc, char**argv){printf("you gave me the string %s.\n",argv[1]);}
<11> that pipes are handled by the shell
<9> and i don't know what to do with the string to work with it
<11> you can just read from stdin
<9> ahh thanks :)
<9> thats nice! :)
<9> :))
<11> still be careful about buffer overuns
<9> jap but the output of the programm is restricted
<11> yes .. but can you really enforce that?
<11> at least for production-quality apps you should never ever make such ***umptions for data which is read from some fd
<11> execept maybe the data is produced by the same program after a fork
<12> i wonder... there are programs (ie. patch) that error out if nothing is piped to them. how's that implemented? select/poll? is data available right away or there needs to be some delay?
<11> EOF
<9> yes i know but at the beginning i hope it would run! :)
<2> there is no hope for programmers.
<11> and we have sunday :)
<9> hehe
<13> domen: my 'patch' (gnu patch 2.5.9) doesn't seem to error out if nothing is piped to it... just waits for console input then
<12> zap-zero: gah. damn, mine too. bad example
<12> "less" is a good one
<2> less tests stdin with isatty().
<13> how do you tell less that it should display standard input in first place?
<2> I guess you can't.
<14> less -
<14> ?
<2> ah. yes.
<13> ok... but then it works with ttys too :-P
<2> hrr, when I tried "less -" I could not quit it :-P
<14> ^c then q works here
<13> but right... 'less' w/o arguments checks if there's anything piped to it of course, and errors out if it isn't the case
<2> tried that.
<0> cat|whatever_program_here
<14> ^c should make the : prompt appear
<14> that too
<2> well, I actually typed some stuff in before quiting.
<14> yeah me too
<2> oh, now it works.
<14> it was fantastic. :)
<12> Auris: nice. thanks
<0> brainphart: I can do this: BOOL b; ... if (( b = ( foo == bar )) || ( foo == baz )) { ... ; if ( b ) { ... } }
<0> ?
<0> bool is typdef'd
<13> is there a simple tool that lists all function definitions (but not declarations and calls) of a certain function in given *.c files?
<0> I mean, evaluation order is such that ***ignment to 'b' is done first ?
<13> s/of a certain function//
<13> all functions would be enough, combined with grep :)
<0> listobj -h -S, or nm foo.o
<0> err objlist
<12> objdump?
<0> see? brainphart grows
<13> i need it for plain source files
<0> zap-zero, I guess ctags can do something useful
<12> zap-zero: i'm guessing ctags or cscope could handle that
<0> hah!
<12> hehe
<0> hmm evaluation order for '||' is from left to right, right?
<13> k, thanks
<2> michai, yes.
<0> right
<13> 'ctags -x' is just what i needed, thanks
<0> right
<6> left
<11> up
<15> down
<11> charm
<6> freaks.
<11> wrong
<6> freaks
<11> Up, Down, Charm, Strange, Top and Bottom!
<0> I guess those were the magic words :)
<11> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quark
<6> see me impressed
<16> hello
<0> can I do this: char c = { ....; 42 };
<11> no
<6> why not? he just did it
<11> well, sure you can do it
<11> yes
<16> but not in c
<16> :D
<11> char c = ({ ....; 42 }); should work in gcc
<0> nm
<0> ah
<11> considering you meant .... as some some sequence of statements
<14> wtf if I may ask
<0> yeah
Return to
#c
or
Go to some related
logs:
#worldchat
#html
topazina in Iceland
#worldchat
#worldchat
#sicilia
#html
#worldchat
#sicilia
#sicilia
|
|