| |
| |
| |
|
Comments:
<0> hi
<0> why videos play so slow under xgl? i tried to change output no xv and other non-opengl outputs, but it is still slow (about 3 frames per second). Can i do anything with that? i have quiet old computer, but playing videos under normal xserver work pretty good
<1> FWIW, OpenGL video is slightly slow here. Xv works best, Xshm next best.
<0> yeah, i have tried xv, it works a little bit faster, but it is much slower than playing under normal xserver
<2> ticc_: normal X server is just a flat 2D image, xgl is all 3D accelerated, which means the 3D chip is heavily used.. that's my guess why it's so slow :P
<0> i have duron 800 + 128mb + geforce4 128mb. Is that hardware too old for playing movies under xgl? do i need faster proc or more ram?
<0> i have bough that geforce especially for xgl :/
<2> faster gfx card :P
<0> :/
<2> _ds: wait until the drivers are updated :P
<2> _ds: xorg 7.1 has changed the driver ABI
<0> nvidia driver are said to be ok (in comparision to those for radeon)
<2> nvidia driver is not updated to work properly with 7.1 yet
<2> they expect it to be fixed until the 9xxx release
<1> I don't see why waiting for drivers to be updated would make any difference - surely they're included in X.org :-)
<0> but is it possible it is an xgl bug and it will work faster with new realese?
<2> _ds: no, they're separate
<1> Well, in as much as 7.1 is modular, yes...
<1> Unless you mean the external Mesa stuff :-)
<2> I mean the external fglrx or whatever the name is
<1> Hmm?
<2> you can't get much performance then
<2> anyways.. if the driver is included in xorg it _should_ work I guess
<2> the nv driver in xorg is crap anyway.. and nvidias own driver isn't updated yet..
<1> I find that I get good enough 3D performance...
<2> how many fps with gfxgears?
<1> I'm currently seeing aroud 688, but that's with xfwm4 with compositor enabled.
<0> i don't have gfgears now, but i ramember using it some time ago, it worked quite fast, but buggy (some strange lines)
<2> 688 fps in "normal" size or fullscreen?
<1> Hmm, 52 full-screen.
<2> sounds like software rendered :P
<2> I get 8000 in normal size :P
<1> Hmm, odd. glxinfo doesn't say software-rendered. Off-screen rendering?
<2> maybe direct rendering is off..?
<1> No, definitely on.
<1> Else things like EDGE would suffer...
<2> dunno what that is..
<1> Or did you mean EDGE?
<2> yes
<1> OpenGL Doom engine.
<2> doom1?
<1> http://edge.sourceforge.net/
<2> site down for maintenance. yay. :P
<1> Hmm. *Still* no content... :-\
<1> Does Doom, Doom2, various bits of Boom. Supports DEHACKED.
<2> I know doom 1 and 2.. :P
<2> and 3 ofcourse ;)
<2> _ds: 35208 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7041.490 FPS <-- this is what I get with glxgears when glx is working properly.. if X can't load the glx part of the driver I get around 300.. :P
<1> Will have to look into this later... probably start by switching back to XAA.
<2> check x-logs to see if it really loads glx properly
<1> I see no GLX-related errors...
<2> mkay
<1> That said, I also don't in a second X session which I had running a few minutes ago.
<1> (Then again, glxgears wouldn't start there - no matching visual.)
Return to
#xine
or
Go to some related
logs:
onfigure: error: xml2-config not found.
#css
linux ksh: : bad substitution
debian p5ld2 ethernet
#gaim
kile ubuntu dcopserver
+fc5 +vnc +bad display name
turbogear connection pool
#css
mysql commands update primary key
|
|